Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical TH 350 ID

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 48stude, Apr 1, 2016.

  1. 48stude
    Joined: Jul 31, 2004
    Posts: 1,382

    48stude
    Member

    I'm thinking of using this trans in my Model A roadster. It's been sitting in my garage for over 25 yrs. I just power washed it off and I'm wondering if it's worth using. I noticed that it doesn't have a removable tailshaft. This was a good ****** when I took it out. I was thinking to have a ****** guy go through it,but if it's a ******* then I would have second thoughts. Thanks, Bill
     

    Attached Files:

  2. indyjps
    Joined: Feb 21, 2007
    Posts: 5,397

    indyjps
    Member

    I'd at least replace front, rear seal and change filter and pan gasket. ****s pulling it back out for a couple dollar part.

    I'm sure more experienced transmission guys can also make recommendations, the parts above are about as far as I go into an auto trans.
     
  3. I'm not seeing a vacuum Modulator either. it is an oddball to me but that doesn't mean that you shouldn't use it.

    I would be interested in knowing ig it is a T350 or some other variation with an odd number that we are not accustomed to.
     
  4. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,939

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    How many bolts are in the pan? HRP
     
  5. redo32
    Joined: Jul 16, 2008
    Posts: 2,314

    redo32
    Member

    I'm not the trans expert around here, but I think that is a TH200. Light duty trans from late 70's- early 80's. Don't put too much horsepower to it and it should(maybe?) be fine in a light Model A.
     
  6. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,939

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I agree, If it has 11 pan bolts it would be a GM turbo 200 or 200c, manufactured from '76 - '87. HRP
     
  7. Gregg Pellicer
    Joined: Aug 20, 2004
    Posts: 1,347

    Gregg Pellicer
    Member

    that is for sure a 200 c
     
  8. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,756

    bobss396
    Member

    TH200 R4 it is. Still an OD unit. It may pay to have a shop look it over and I'd say a full rebuild may be the way to go. Some shops have a reasonable carry-in service.
     
  9. tazareno
    Joined: Jul 21, 2010
    Posts: 49

    tazareno
    Member

    Here's a little size reference ImageUploadedByH.A.M.B.1459539310.828194.jpg
     
    bobg1951chevy likes this.
  10. 48stude
    Joined: Jul 31, 2004
    Posts: 1,382

    48stude
    Member

    Yup, It has 11 pan bolts. Here's the crazy thing, A guy gave me a 77 Impala which had a remanufactured motor( 350) and ******( I think from Sears) in it , which I took out and put in a 79 El Camino and ran until the body gave up. I rebuilt the 350 and it's been in a friends 36 Ford pickup for a good while . This is the same ****** that was in those two heavy vehicles with no problem. But since I'm using a tri-powered 327 in my roadster, I'm leery about using it . I knew you guys would nail this pretty quick and I thank you .:D:D Bill
     
  11. 56sedandelivery
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 6,694

    56sedandelivery
    Member Emeritus

    They're (TH200) considered to be a "metric" trans. The Stock and Super Stock drag racers have taken to them due to their overall weight, internal rotating m***, and gearing. Of course, they are heavily modified to hold up. You're appears to have an electronic speedometer. Rebuild it, shift kit installation, and don't continually beat it like it's an ARMY mule, and it'll be fine. Do an online search for TH200 in drag racing.
    I am Butch/56sedandelivery.
     
  12. 48stude
    Joined: Jul 31, 2004
    Posts: 1,382

    48stude
    Member

    Thanks Butch, I'm running a banjo rear with a Winters center section and 820-15 rear tire , neither like to be treated like an army mule:cool: Thanks again, I appreciate it. Bill
     
  13. gotta56forme
    Joined: Feb 20, 2010
    Posts: 855

    gotta56forme
    Member
    from Seattle

    48stude: did you figure out from the measurements if it's a TH200 (not overdrive) or a TH200-4R (overdrive). I'm curious, since people said it was both in this thread.

    Gotta56forme/Scott
     
  14. mgtstumpy
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 9,279

    mgtstumpy
    Member

    TURBO HYDRAMATIC 200 (METRIC) http://www.700r4l60e.com/transmission_gm.html
    General Motors 1976 & Later
    [​IMG]

    11 Pan Bolts
    THM200 (TH200) - Light duty, "Metric" 3 speed transmission.
    Gear ratios on these units were 2.74 1st gear, 1.57 2nd gear, 1.00 3rd gear.
     
  15. Gregg Pellicer
    Joined: Aug 20, 2004
    Posts: 1,347

    Gregg Pellicer
    Member

    wrong that is a 200c not a 200r4.It is a 3 speed not an OD trans. It is a good little trans though.Like the 700 4r and the 200r4 the TV cable adjustment is critical
     
  16. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,756

    bobss396
    Member

    Do I get partial credit at least?
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  17. 48stude
    Joined: Jul 31, 2004
    Posts: 1,382

    48stude
    Member

    It's definitely not a OD transmission. Bill
     
  18. As Gregg mentioned above; THE TV CABLE ADJUSTMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE LIFE OF THIS TRANS.
    The cable is NOT a kick-down like a TH350, but a throttle pressure control. I burned one up after less then a mile due to a broken cable end.
     
  19. dan31
    Joined: Jul 3, 2011
    Posts: 1,100

    dan31
    Member

    Maybe one of you transmission guys can answer this. Would a 200 4r live behind a 450-500 hp small block in a model a coupe?,is it the same trans used by grand nationals because i see them run 11 second runs all day but always hear that they are weak,so what is the real deal?
     
    caseywheels likes this.
  20. mgtstumpy
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 9,279

    mgtstumpy
    Member

  21. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,561

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If it is a TH200. S**** value only.
     
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2016
    dan31 likes this.
  22. 48stude
    Joined: Jul 31, 2004
    Posts: 1,382

    48stude
    Member

    For the time being , I've lost interest in using this transmission. That tv cable turns me off. I took a better look at that cable, until this thread enlightened me, I thought it was just a kick down . I see a spring for the pressure and an adjustment. Wouldn't look that great on a traditional style build. To be more blunt , it's fugly. But, it's certainly been an education for me and fun. Thanks again, Bill
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.