Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Is a Y block smaller than an FE?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Duellym, May 27, 2016.

  1. Duellym
    Joined: Feb 28, 2016
    Posts: 358

    Duellym
    Member

    So a guy in the list is selling a Y block on the list. I was thinking of swapping rhat into my jailbar because the fe doesn't clear rhe steering shaft. I cannot for my life figure out how to route the steering around the head, not in a way that seems like I could still have it on a semi stock frame. I saw a t bird at kittys yesterday with a Y block in it. It didn't appear to be any smaller, of course it was in a t bird not a pickup truck.

    I would imagine there smaller just because they aren't big cube engines.

    I hope they are but if not it looks like I'm going to be plopping a 302 and a t5 into it.

    Pic of t bird motor:

    [​IMG]

    Thanks in advance.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  2. RB35
    Joined: Dec 15, 2006
    Posts: 971

    RB35
    Member

    A y-block is smaller dimensionally and weight-wise than an FE which is the basis for the Ford big block. As with all Fords after Flatheads, they are a bit longer than a sbc and a y-block is heavier than the 302. The y-block came in '54-'64 trucks if that helps.
     
  3. d2_willys
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,343

    d2_willys
    Member
    from Kansas

    Well this may be nitpicking, but the FE blocks ARE Y BLOCKS. But anyways, check with the Y block experts online. They probably have the measurements. The Lincoln Y blocks are probably closer to the FE size than the Ford Y's are.
     
  4. Duellym
    Joined: Feb 28, 2016
    Posts: 358

    Duellym
    Member

    Awesome thanks guys. I'm probably going to a y block then. Thanks

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  5. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,981

    squirrel
    Member

    The exhaust manifolds on the Y block go up, so it might have more room around the steering than the FE.

    20160429_145420.jpg
     
  6. Duellym
    Joined: Feb 28, 2016
    Posts: 358

    Duellym
    Member

    Wow this is looking better and better all of a sudden. Thanks

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
     
  7. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,981

    squirrel
    Member

    to give you an idea how it clears the steering box in a 59

    20160429_142437.jpg
     
    dana barlow likes this.
  8. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,981

    squirrel
    Member

    And if you use the truck single exhaust setup, with the crossover in front of the engine up top, there is a whole lotta room

    001.jpg
     
    dana barlow likes this.
  9. AVater
    Joined: Dec 9, 2008
    Posts: 3,483

    AVater
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The T-bird engine could be about an inch shorter if you take out the ring behind the water pump. To the best of my knowledge, only they used this spacer.

    Please correct me if I am wrong.
     
  10. Duellym
    Joined: Feb 28, 2016
    Posts: 358

    Duellym
    Member

    That's what I said to my father, it's a shorter block but the water pump is huge so it doesn't seem to be any shorter.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
     
  11. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,981

    squirrel
    Member

    The 302 is a LOT smaller...
     
  12. miker98038
    Joined: Jan 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,590

    miker98038
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The bird's used the spacer and a different harmonic balancer, mostly to clear the front crossmember and lower the engine under the hood. The spacer results in less effective cooling, and the fix is to remove the spacer, then space the water pump pulley out. It's nominally 1". If you go with the upswept manifolds, try to find the late model flat top ones, they flow better. That said, it's not that tough to put an FE in an early bird, so you won't gain much except the manifold. The trucks used ram horns, but they won't clear side engine mounts. Trucks used a front mount, and ears on the bellhousing. Very similar to a 55-56 sbc and powerglide.
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2016
  13. Duellym
    Joined: Feb 28, 2016
    Posts: 358

    Duellym
    Member

    Lol I'm not look to put a fe in a t bird, I'm looking to put it in a 47 ford truck. thanks anyway. That does help me with some oft the other things though.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
     
  14. Duellym
    Joined: Feb 28, 2016
    Posts: 358

    Duellym
    Member

    And alot cheaper probably.

    But I know that a 302 will fit in my truck. I want to keep the truck nostalgic though. And y blocks are cool.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
     
  15. miker98038
    Joined: Jan 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,590

    miker98038
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I know you're not trying to put it in a bird. My point is, the FE isn't much bigger. Go look at some original Y block trucks. The front mount and Rams horns might help. But, then you either run a Fordo, or the granny low truck Trans, or spring for an adapter for a C-4. Or have Mummert sell you a truck bell for a T-5. Now the 302 is way cheaper. I'm running two stoker Y blocks, I've got the receipts to prove it.
     
  16. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    There is a HAMB member that sells adapter plates to fit y-block valve covers on an SBF,if you want to have some folks scratching their heads.:D
     
  17. Duellym
    Joined: Feb 28, 2016
    Posts: 358

    Duellym
    Member

    Oh ok, I've decided to at least try and make the fe fit, if not looks like I'm going to a 302. I just don't like the low power numbers for a y block although a 302 isn't much better.
     
  18. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,981

    squirrel
    Member

    Now you see why the chevy motors are so popular in Fords...
     
    Torkwrench and dana barlow like this.
  19. dana barlow
    Joined: May 30, 2006
    Posts: 5,435

    dana barlow
    Member
    from Miami Fla.

    FE are the Fords big block an lot bigger then what is refered to as a Y.
    In some cases,its missunderstanding.
    Y-block Ford/272/292/312 from bellhousing bolt up to front of water pump nose is 29in.
    SBC Chevy with short waterpump " " " " " " " " " " " " 28in. = not a big deal I'd say
    The above size includs the nose shaft of water pumps that is left off most size charts.

    To some guys that just don't understand the Ford has the block casting made/designed so the cranlshafe is up in side the block so there is a lot of main bearing support using a short hight lower oilpan,vs the chevy SBC crank hangs 1/2 way out of the block casting= makes some think they see a bigger taller engine,but the're very close to the same hight too. The Ford casting is a stronger casting an is by the extra casting a few more lbs. then SBC.
    Hope that clears up some old wifetails that have been p***ed around for some time. I raced both engines an I won with both engines,the SBC cost me less $ in the 1970/80s to make HP,but before that in the 50s/early 60s the Y-block kicked ***.
    As for power,pick a Apirl 2016 Hot Rod mag, has some stuff about Y-block,above my piggy bank,but fun read.
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2016
  20. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,396

    sunbeam
    Member

    There is always a 351
     
  21. BradinNC
    Joined: Mar 18, 2014
    Posts: 215

    BradinNC
    Member

    Below is a very useful engine spec table comparing various makes and sizes of engines.
    It does not look like the y-block is on the list but it's still a good reference.
    http://www.carnut.com/specs/engdim.html
     
  22. Duellym
    Joined: Feb 28, 2016
    Posts: 358

    Duellym
    Member

    Thank you for that chart.

    I bring good news!

    So today I was doing stuff to my truck and noticed the motor looks like is a little off. I knew that the motor was not 100% straight in the truck but I never noticed that the motor is actually about an inch closer to the drivers frame rail than the p***enger. all I think I need is a about 1/2 an inch to clear the steering shaft and that's it. So all is looking well for now. Now all I really need to worry about getting a rear sump pan for it, and see about getting pedals that mount to the firewall.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  23. studebakerjoe
    Joined: Jul 7, 2015
    Posts: 1,177

    studebakerjoe
    Member

    Are you planning on putting the y-block in just the way you find it or do you plan on rebuilding it? A y-block can put out close to 500 HP are you looking for more than that?
     
  24. studebakerjoe
    Joined: Jul 7, 2015
    Posts: 1,177

    studebakerjoe
    Member

    In the Amsoil engine masters challenge Jon Kaase had a Y-block that put out 584hp @5500 rpm and 596 lb ft @4600 rpm. That might be enough for a pickup.
     
  25. Duellym
    Joined: Feb 28, 2016
    Posts: 358

    Duellym
    Member

    Yes I think that would be sufficient and I would be rebuilding it.
    584 hp should to me like it's kinda pushing the limitations of the motor, and is that motor even streetable? I plan on driving my truck on the streets mostly and racing it every now and then. A almost 600 hp y block in a 2900 lbs truck probably isn't gonna be a good driver.
    I know fe's can make about 600 streetable horsepower and my motor is probably one of the cleanest ones on the planet since it was built in 1968 rebuilt shortly after and never ran since. A stroker kit a valvetrain kit and a new intake will more than likely give me that, I'd be willing to bet it's cheaper than doing a y block build as well. and fe's are really cool.
     
  26. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,981

    squirrel
    Member

    I bet the motor as it is now, without anything to make it go fast, will do ok. You have a lot of other, more important stuff to worry about right now. You can work on go fast stuff after you get it driving
     
  27. Duellym
    Joined: Feb 28, 2016
    Posts: 358

    Duellym
    Member

    Oh well of course I don't plan on building a motor anytime soon. I'd have to box the frame put better brakes on etc. the only thing I'd do now is put a better intake and headers on it. I'm more worried about making it stop and hande good, for what it is, than making it run right now.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.