Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Tube or No Tube

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by bgreene30, Aug 1, 2016.

  1. bgreene30
    Joined: Feb 26, 2011
    Posts: 44

    bgreene30
    Member

    Hi everyone, I am finishing up the motor rebuild on my uncles 48 Pontiac Streamliner Straight 8 and down to a tire decision The current tires have new tread and look fine but on close look you can see the cracks from 30 years of sitting and not being used.

    Would someone typically put in new tubes and run old tires or replace both?

    The 48 has stock steel wheels that are in great shape. Can modern radials be used instead of tube type? What would the modern size equivalent be for 6.50-16"

    The bias tube type are pretty pricey about $150-175 plus tubes and shipping.

    Thanks in advance.
    Bob
     
  2. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,281

    F&J
    Member

    There was a recent thread with the same pricing comparison issues and fitting radials to old narrow wheels on AACA website. It was a 42 Ford, so same skinny wheel width.

    The radial size to be skinny, would also be a collector type tire, so even more $ than bias collector tires

    He ended up using bias to save money.

    I don't scare easy, but I would not use 30 year old bias. Bias are more tolerant to age compared to radial, but that is just too risky with cracks showing

    .
     
    afaulk, Hnstray and falcongeorge like this.
  3. bgreene30
    Joined: Feb 26, 2011
    Posts: 44

    bgreene30
    Member

    Thank you! I agree with replacing the tires as well.



     
  4. I wouldn't use the old tires with new tubes. The tube holds air but the tire holds up the car.

    I run radials or bias plies depending on the car. I guess you can say that I am not biased. :D I don't like the idea of running radials on old wheels. The added bite of a radial will over ride the suspension of a vehicle that does not have the suspension designed with the radial in mind. If they will over ride the suspension what do you think they are doing to the wheels.
     
  5. Barn Find
    Joined: Feb 2, 2013
    Posts: 2,312

    Barn Find
    Member
    from Missouri

    I've heard that you should run tubes if the rims were designed for tubes. They might hold air without tubes, but they might also unseat the bead going around a corner if the rim was not designed to run tubeless.
     
  6. clem
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 4,549

    clem
    Member

    Please don't use 30 year old tyres. - For your safety and the safety of those on the same road as you.
    If they are cracking, - toss them.
    Use tubes, as I doubt your old rims will seal for tubeless tyres.
     
  7. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    When I assembled my '55 F100, I had reversed '50 Merc 6" steel wheels in front, same in back but with 7" Buick outers. Bias Ply 'big-and-littles', '50 Merc 'ash can' caps, factory fit on the Merc wheels. (NOT aftermarket caps)
    Never a problem, in 70K miles.
    I then switched over to tubeless radials, 1.95 60 X 15 front, 235 70 X 15 rear. Ride improved greatly.
    Turning onto a city street, (inside turn, left turn/left wheel) Lost the hubcap. When I retrieved it, there were scratches around the perimeter, but nothing that showed too bad inside the reversed wheel...Lost it again, another left turn.:eek:
    Examined it and deduced that the wheel was flexing with the radial tire, whereas the stiff bias ply would tend to have more 'constitution' with the wheel as a unit.
    (this was a strong selling point for aluminum replacement wheels on steel-wheeled BMWs in the '70s...the steel wheels flexed in 'autocross' and road racing conditions, illustrated by Factory film and handouts)

    My foster Dad gave me the Romeo Palamides "Pre-American Torq Thrusts" from his '29 roadster, and the hubcap loss ceased.:cool:
    That wasn't the only reason to run the Palamides wheels...they were designed for F100s!
    Oh, I use tubes. These are 2 piece wheels.
     
  8. 56premiere
    Joined: Mar 8, 2011
    Posts: 1,445

    56premiere
    Member
    from oregon

    A few years back I bought a 37 Chevy sedan with 44000 original miles. The tires looked good for being made during wwii, so just to drive it to town and show it as found we did. 20 miles total ,drove good next morning I went in the shop and the tube was sting out of the tread, like a tongue. Don't run the old tires.
     
    afaulk likes this.
  9. Coker make a radial in that size, black or white wall. Coker Classic.
     
  10. dirty old man
    Joined: Feb 2, 2008
    Posts: 8,910

    dirty old man
    Member Emeritus

    As yet I don't have any personal experience in running radial tires on rims that were used oem with bias ply tires. But note that I said YET, because when I replace the Coker/BFG whitwalls on my roadster, most likely I will go to radials for ride and handling, prolly Diamondback WW.
    On their website Db quotes a statement from the US DOT stating that the radial tire puts LESS STRESS ON THE RIM than a bias ply tire, especially for cord rupture from impact forces.
     
  11. birdman1
    Joined: Dec 6, 2012
    Posts: 1,666

    birdman1
    Member

    atwater mike, just how fast did you go around that corner to loose a hubcap??? LOL
     
  12. Barn Find
    Joined: Feb 2, 2013
    Posts: 2,312

    Barn Find
    Member
    from Missouri

    I lost wheelcovers all the time driving '58 and '59 Fords with radial tires. I always thought it was the hub caps of poor quality, but maybe it was the tires and wheels flexing.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.