Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Altered and your local track?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by dumprat, Aug 12, 2016.

  1. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,572

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    Hey fellas I am looking to put together a T based altered drag car for fooling with at some local tracks. Anybody else doing something similar? What sort of problems am I going to run into with getting it certified? Not looking to be John Force just wanna go fast with a bunch of stuff I have left from previous projects.
     
  2. Fedman
    Joined: Dec 17, 2005
    Posts: 1,163

    Fedman
    Member

    The least expensive route is going to be buyimg something you like,
    that is already running and is certified.
    When you build there are costs that are in the "Build" that you cannot escape from.
    An Altered Drag Car will be a ton of fun, but from my experience as soon as the Engine is out front, the rules tighten up, and it is more difficult and expensive to get to the Staging Lanes.
    Best of luck with your Project! :)
     
  3. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,572

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    I am not very interested in buying things. But I hear your point.

    Basicly I am thing an un streetable T bucket with a cage.
     
  4. Fedman
    Joined: Dec 17, 2005
    Posts: 1,163

    Fedman
    Member

    How fast do you want to go?
     
  5. Boyd Wylie
    Joined: Oct 29, 2010
    Posts: 746

    Boyd Wylie
    Member

    Go out to Mission Raceways and talk to people racing Altered. If you want to run 9.99or quicker,it will cost more to get a car ready than running 10's. I have some stuff left from my selling out. BBC short block,Firesuit [depending on your size] Powerglide torque convertor. A few other things.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  6. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,572

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    No faster than 10's

    I have a really heathy small block and an thinking four speed just for nastyness thanks for the offer though. What size is the suit? I am 6' and wear a 50 jacket. And I ain't fat.
     
  7. marshall
    Joined: Mar 19, 2001
    Posts: 782

    marshall
    Member
    from tacoma/wa.

    image.jpeg We built one and it was some what cheap and easy with a 7.50 cert.
    How ever my FED was not .
     
    Fedman and cactus1 like this.
  8. marshall
    Joined: Mar 19, 2001
    Posts: 782

    marshall
    Member
    from tacoma/wa.

    There is some build threads of it some where on this board
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  9. Boyd Wylie
    Joined: Oct 29, 2010
    Posts: 746

    Boyd Wylie
    Member

    the suit won't fit you
     
  10. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,572

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    Ok thanks anyway. Boyd wylie

    @marshall that car looks wicked. I think that is way out of my league though.
     
  11. marshall
    Joined: Mar 19, 2001
    Posts: 782

    marshall
    Member
    from tacoma/wa.

    It wasn't that hard to do ,if you used an 2x4 frame it would be easier.
    You can do it trust me, all you need to do is get started.
     
  12. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Dumprat, pm rocket88 on here, he is an ex tech guy at Mission, he can tell you exactly what they will want to see at the track you will be racing at.
     
  13. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,572

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    Hmm didn't know Rocket88 was a tech guy. Haven't talked to him in a few years. I will try that.

    And yes @marshall I will be getting started on this soon enough. Just gathering parts and ideas at this point. And that is always part of the fun.
     
  14. oldolds
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 3,658

    oldolds
    Member

    Look at the NHRA rule book. It spells it out. 10.00 or slower safety stuff is minimal. Depends on some things about the car what type of suit you need. You may need tethers for your arms. Helmet with Snell rating can get pricey. A $50 cycle helmet isn't good enough. A car with suspension is the cheapest way to go. Less breakage.
     
  15. old sparks
    Joined: Mar 12, 2012
    Posts: 414

    old sparks
    Member

    I`ve done what you are planning to do running a 292 chevy six. 1 and a half by 3 frame ,solid mount rear, model a front end . If I had it to do all over , I would use a small block chevy in front of the powerglide, more power and much cheaper. I did all work myself except the machine work on the motor. I have about 5 grand in the whole car and run low 11`s. The biggest problem is I always want to go faster and that means more money
     
  16. 97
    Joined: May 18, 2005
    Posts: 1,983

    97
    Member

  17. ididntdoit1960
    Joined: Dec 13, 2011
    Posts: 1,432

    ididntdoit1960
    Member
    from Western MA

    I'm doing the same thing now - Ive been sending pictures to the nhra division tech inspector as I go....he tells me what I need to change, or what his concerns are. Once I have his approval at a given stage, the tig comes out (just tacked until that point) mine is just a simple car too - 2×3 rails, no rear suspension, 42' rear track width 96' wheelbase, transverse spring 42' front axle, center steer with a corvair box, 12:1 283 poweglide - I don't know how you would shift a 4 speed with center steer....most early cars used a top shifted 3 speed with no first and only had to shift once.
     
    Fedman and falcongeorge like this.
  18. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    This...
     
  19. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,572

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    Curious why the center steer? And wouldn't a suspended rear squat for better traction?

    At this point my plan is as follows. Using parts I already have
    289 built out of roller 5.0. Done to the maximum I could afford. Specs to 400+hp.
    Mustang steering box
    Plymouth wavy tube front axle
    23? T steel body
    Dana 44 out of a jeep Cherokee (good axles are cheap and I have lots of parts)
    34 front spring
    40 rear spring
    F100 pedals
    T tank
     
  20. old sparks
    Joined: Mar 12, 2012
    Posts: 414

    old sparks
    Member

    centersteer because weight and tradition. the cage becomes more involved when you go side steer and because, I think you`ll be in the 10`s, the tech people will look pretty close. solid rear is easy and light. we have a couple of events down here where tech is not much of an issue but towing for hours to not being allowed to run ****s. If you solid mount the rear use 10 bolts total
     
  21. dreracecar
    Joined: Aug 27, 2009
    Posts: 3,476

    dreracecar
    Member
    from so-cal

    Center steer because all that suspension stuff adds weight and complicates things because you have to control it, Solid lets the tires (as designed) do all the work..
    Get a copy of the rule book and follow the spec.. Being a slower car that does not have to have the ch***is inspected or tagged, It still has to meet requirements of the certed ch***is, thus one cant use muffler tubing to build the cage. The cage structure has to be made with 1 5/8 x .118 material minimum if mild steel is used, the problem is that size does not exist and one must use .134 wall to be legal which is hard to get at your local metal supply house. What they carry and called out as .120 wall, measures .114. . Why am I saying this--- because at any time NHRA could start certing cars 10 to 11.99 to start collecting a $50 cert fee, so why start over- do it right the first time.
    There are a lot of inexpensive cars on the market (racinjunk) that should be looked into before you decide to build one. main thing is that you get to start racing sooner, builds take dedicated time,space and money to complete- used cars are 0.30 on the dollar spent and if you ever do decide to build new later on and sell what you had, the loss you take on the used car is still cheaper then building new
     
    Fedman likes this.
  22. ididntdoit1960
    Joined: Dec 13, 2011
    Posts: 1,432

    ididntdoit1960
    Member
    from Western MA

    as above I went with a 42" rear and a bantam body so I really had to go center steer - a lot of early coupe bodied altereds were left hand steer - nothing wrong with what your trying to do - I just wanted to build a really simple car that I will probably run 2-3 times a year.......The max I will shoot for in the 1/4 once its all sorted out and "improved" will be 10.90. I built it to fit in the early 60s B/A rules as far as dimensions, weight to cubic inches and setback are concerned.
     
  23. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,572

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    1.625 .125 wall DOM is common here as it is the rock buggy tube of choice. The local shop has probably twenty lengths in stock. It mics out at damn near perfect. wonder why the stuff you are getting is thinner?
     
  24. pnevells
    Joined: Sep 5, 2008
    Posts: 567

    pnevells
    Member

    We built this T bucket, it p***ed NHRA ch***is cert, we run 9.58 at 136 with it jalopy3.jpg jalpoy5.jpg
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2016
  25. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,572

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    That looks a lot like what I have in mind.
     
  26. Boyd Wylie
    Joined: Oct 29, 2010
    Posts: 746

    Boyd Wylie
    Member

    dumprat, I'll go through what is left from our racing. There may be something you can use. Pretty sure I have arm restraints ,weather station,delay box.
     
  27. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,572

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    Hmm cool thanks!
     
  28. dreracecar
    Joined: Aug 27, 2009
    Posts: 3,476

    dreracecar
    Member
    from so-cal

    Because DOM is expensive compared to ERW. Look through any of the ch***is kits available and they are all ERW and 134 wall. For some reason ASTM specs were adjusted to allow the thinner wall of ERW to maintain its thicker rating. Years ago many ch***is companys took a big hit when NHRA started to sonic the ch***is and found that the wall was thinner then what they thought they ordered. If one had the source to buy Dom tubing at .125 fine, but I can buy chrom moly tubing cheaper. The whole point was to inform that what is listed or sold as is not always the case when it comes to tubing and most people don't check it before they buy
     
  29. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,572

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    Fair enough. I used a chunk of .093 wall for my steering column and it measured right on size. I think what we are getting here is actually a seamless hydraulic pressure tube. I have bought 7/8ths before for motorcycle parts, all from a hydraulic shop for use as fluid transfer tubing.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.