Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Is there an open drive conversion that keeps the stock 1940 Ford Transmission?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Russco, Nov 25, 2016.

  1. Russco
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 4,397

    Russco
    Member
    from Central IL

    Is there a way to run a open drive rear with the stock 1940 side shift transmission? I'm not aware of any but was hoping i was wrong. Thanks
     
  2. i believe you can use `46-`48 Ford pickup transmission parts to convert your `40 transmission to open drive

    others here will know more
     
    Squablow and LOU WELLS like this.
  3. Texas Webb
    Joined: Jan 5, 2010
    Posts: 5,110

    Texas Webb
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I think 36-3 window is correct.Seems like there are some parts for sale here or Fordbarn.
     
  4. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,260

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If you need to, Speedway has a kt that allows you to covert a banjo rear to open drive. I just saw a post on it and it looked real slick. Wasn't overly expensive either. Check them out.
     
  5. Russco
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 4,397

    Russco
    Member
    from Central IL

    I'm looking to keep the original engine and trans and go with a open drive rear end other than the banjo so I need to convert the stock trans to an open type. Converting a banjo to open doesn't solve my problem.
     
  6. Marty Strode
    Joined: Apr 28, 2011
    Posts: 9,712

    Marty Strode
    Member

    You can use the tail housing and main shaft off of a '42 to '52 pickup, but the mount is different, would require some fabrication to make the change. If you could find a '51-'52 pickup trans, they are side shift.
     
  7. warbird1
    Joined: Jan 3, 2015
    Posts: 1,361

    warbird1
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    What Marty said ^^^. If I recall correctly, the pickup mount is slightly longer but should be workable.
     
  8. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,652

    thirtytwo
    Member

    Just an FYI speedway used to sell the hot rod works conversion , now they started making their own , probably in China ... I've seen two that don't fit for **** on the splines... If that's the route you want to go for the rear , get it from HRW !

    The info on the 42-47 frock trans is correct , I'm not sure on the span between the mounts but I'm sure something could be made to work with either biscuits or the truck rubber mount, I made an adaptor to the biscuits on one once .. I believe it was a 40 crossmember
     
    100% Matt and need louvers ? like this.
  9. This may be a dumb question but why not keep the original rear end. If they are properly rebuilt they don't cause problems. I believe the guys are right about the truck parts but check with Mac VanPelt, http://www.vanpeltsales.com/FH_web/flathead_home.htm He is a member here and the "go to" guy for the early transmissions.

    Charlie Stephens
     
    need louvers ? and LOU WELLS like this.
  10. Russco
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 4,397

    Russco
    Member
    from Central IL

    I drive my cars several thousand miles a year and I'm not talking 4 or 5 thousand, I'm talking like 12 thousand plus. Its not uncommon for me to take my hot rod on a 1000 mile trip for the weekend and the guys I travel with , well we run 75MPH+ for hours on end. If you have ever tried that in a flathead with a 3.78 gear you'll understand why I want to change it. My last Flathead, a '51 Shoebox vert, I swapped the rear to a 3.00 geared 8" and it was perfect. So I'm either going to have to swap a high winding SBC for the flat head or swap the rear end to an open drive with a much higher gear. Since adding a Parallel leaf kit to mount a new rear end will also get the rear of the car lowered as well that would be my first choice if its possible.
     
    firstinsteele and Hnstray like this.
  11. roundvalley
    Joined: Apr 10, 2005
    Posts: 1,776

    roundvalley
    Member

    Get VanPelts transmision book or I will loan you one. Tells you how and what parts.
     
  12. 40cpe
    Joined: Oct 28, 2010
    Posts: 379

    40cpe
    Member
    from Star, MS

    If you convert your transmission to open drive, I'm not sure the center section in the X-member has clearance for an open driveshaft. If I'm not mistaken, a 3.3X ring and pinion is available for the banjo. That gear and larger tires should get you to where you need to be.
     
  13. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 17,167

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    There are 3.27 gears available.
     
  14. firebrrat
    Joined: Jun 26, 2010
    Posts: 102

    firebrrat
    Member

    Well this will be a bit more money but why not a good over drive, columbia? I have one and love it. My buddy has a 40 deluxe coupe with a Columbia he drives it all the time and runs 75 at about 2500 ish.

    Sent from my SM-G900V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    thirtytwo likes this.
  15. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,356

    Hnstray
    Member
    from Quincy, IL

    The pickup transmission, or parts thereof, is probably the easiest way to get an open drive in your application. However, I went a slightly different route. On a '47 Coupe I did several years ago, I too wanted a later model rear end and installed the Ch***is Engineering parallel leaf kit and an 8" Ford axle ***embly. On the transmission end, I used a '50 Merc trans I had laying around ('49/'50/early '51) . That was a bolt up to the engine and I used the the '47 side cover (arms were a bit different on the Merc) to mate with stock shift rods.

    The rear mount in the ch***is required modification. I drilled the rivets out of the bottom plate on the X member, same for the stock mount inside the X, and removed it too. I then fabbed a replacement mount for inside the X that accepted a conventional Ford or GM trans mount insulator that was bolted to the Merc tailhousing mount pad. Bolted the bottom plate onto the X member, had a driveshaft fabbed, replumbed the brake lines and drove it at speed with reasonable rpms.

    Ray
     
  16. Here is a picture of the truck parts you need to turn the transmission into open drive. Plus of course drive shaft yoke. I recently sold these. Note you only need one each of the two parts.

    Charlie Stephens IMG_1970.jpg
     
    patmanta and need louvers ? like this.
  17. RoddyB34
    Joined: Oct 13, 2009
    Posts: 542

    RoddyB34
    Member

    You could go one step further and eliminate the vulnerable original 3 speed box ,,using a 3 speed 60s mustang type transmission ,,easily adapted to the flathead and already open drive ,,adapt the linkages to the original 40 column ,,very strong unit ,,,
     
    Hnstray likes this.
  18. bchrismer
    Joined: Jun 1, 2007
    Posts: 2,833

    bchrismer
    Member

    Hey Mike,

    You could do what I did and use an early Ford to Chevy transmission adapter, and stick a Saginaw behind it. You have 4 choices of 1st and 2nd gear ratios with the Saginaw, and you get a sync'd 1st gear. I was cheap and used a Speedy Bill version that uses the stock style linkage, came with a new throwout bearing and sleeve. Only parts we needed to make was a throwout bearing return spring mount for the transmission, and some shifter arms to reach the shift levers on the transmission. I actually will redo the shift levers to clock them forward, eventually, to make it shift a bit easier.

    I'm running 2.79 gears in my rear axle, and used the 3 line Saginaw. First gear is a 3.5 ratio, Second is 1.89.
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2016
    Hnstray likes this.
  19. 4dFord/SC
    Joined: Sep 12, 2004
    Posts: 837

    4dFord/SC
    Member

    x2. I drive my flathead '40 with a Columbia at 70+ with no problem. Other options are the Mitchell OD kit, or a 3.54 rear end. IMHO, all seem like less h***le than converting to open drive.
     
  20. Russco; I just changed an Open drive gear box to closed and have all the take out parts. I don't have the slip yoke for the drive shaft but they are the same as a Power glide. So I've been told many times. Yes you can do exactly what you asked in your opening question. It's no big deal. If interested in my parts send me a PM.
    The Wizzard
     
    Russco likes this.
  21. Or, you could get a '49-'51 Merc overdrive trans which is already open driveline plus it's a direct bolt-up to the engine. Kill 3 birds with one rock.
     
  22. steel rebel
    Joined: Jun 14, 2006
    Posts: 3,604

    steel rebel
    Member Emeritus

    Here is a photo of both the late '40s truck 3 speed, Merc. O.D. or all three if you count the '49 Merc. three speed with floor shift linkage on the left.
    IMG_0812.jpg
     
  23. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,356

    Hnstray
    Member
    from Quincy, IL

    Having installed a Merc 3 speed (see post# 15), I believe the O/D version will not fit in the X member.

    Ray
     
  24. Russco
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 4,397

    Russco
    Member
    from Central IL

    Thanks for all the replies. There sure are more options than I realized. I will have to do some figuring and try to make a decision.
    Brett on the Saginaw swap, how well does the original clutch and shift linkage work out? I want to keep the column shift, but it must work nice and smooth otherwise its a no go, same with the original clutch linkage. The Columbia is a cool option but I looked around online and didn't see any nice rebuilt ones for a '40 for sale anywhere, and I'm betting cost wise I can put a nice 8" or 9" in there WITH the Parallel leaf kit for the same money or less. I'm going to have to do some more research and come up with a plan. Thanks for all the info fellas once again this place comes through.
     
  25. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    Russco,

    On a traditional sight, this may not be the most popular answer, but personally, I'd convert the rear to an open driveline and hide an S-10 five speed. You not only get the advantage of the over drive, but a much larger advantage in a deeper first gear, plus far better spacing through the other three. Basically, it means your engine never falls out of it's torque band, and doesn't have to "start over" each time it's shifted. Shifter comes out at pretty close to the right place to mimic a top shift Ford trans, too.

    Frank Oddo wrote something about 35 years ago I have never forgot... "Nostalgia Stops At The Firewall"! He was a hard core flathead guy, and already championing better gearing.
     
    Hnstray likes this.
  26. bchrismer
    Joined: Jun 1, 2007
    Posts: 2,833

    bchrismer
    Member

    Mike,

    The only issue that I have, at this point, is the shifter arms on the transmission. They need to be clocked forward, at a 90 degree angle to the shift rods. Mine are currently pointed directly down, so shifting into 1st and 3rd is currently a little clunky, since it p***es into an overextended position. Once they are clocked right, I think it'll be totally fine.

    My application was behind a SBC, with an early Ford adapter, to the early Ford to Chevy transmission adapter, so I was concerned about the clutch and pressure plate setup. I wound up using a Chevy diaphram style pressure plate and took about 1/8" off the fingers to clear the sleeve that allows the use of the early Ford throwout bearing. If you are running it behind a flathead, you should be able to use the flathead pressure plate with a Chevy clutch disc. Also, the Powerglide to early Ford adapter that I used is 3/8" deeper than the Speedway or Offenhauser Chevy to early Ford adapter, so I had to use a long pilot bushing.

    One thing that I learned, from years of driving the F100 with the 3 on the tree, is to use a palm down pushing action to make that shift from 1st to 2nd. Helps keep from accidentally hitting reverse and pushes the lever down to hit second. Second to third also palm down, pulling it into 3rd.
     
  27. The 39 guy
    Joined: Nov 5, 2010
    Posts: 3,779

    The 39 guy
    Member

    Russco I wanted to say congratulations on the feature of your 40 coupe in Rod and Kulture! I realize you just want to convert your ****** to open drive. Looks like the guys have given you a good plan for that. As to the 49 Mercury OD conversion some have mentioned I did that on my 40 coupe.Although the end result works well it is a lot of work to get it to fit the cross-member. I run a 3.89 9 inch rear and she will cruise at 70 under 3000 RPM.
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2016
  28. Russco
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 4,397

    Russco
    Member
    from Central IL

    I agree with you on the 5 speed trans, I actually have a Tremec TKO600 in my '40 coupe now. The car I'm asking about on this I want to retain the column shift. I'm not concerned about performance just highway cruisability (is that a word?) and keeping the original Column shift.
     
  29. Russco
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 4,397

    Russco
    Member
    from Central IL

    Thanks I was surprised how nice of a write up they gave it. (thanks Spike Kilmer for that)

    I know that trans mount area under there isnt very friendly when trying to put a larger trans in there. I learned that lesson on my blue 40 putting the Tremec in there. I sure like the idea about using the newer fully synchronized Saginaw while retaining the stock clutch and column shift linkages.
     
  30. I've been following this and think I see your vision and also understand what you'd like to end up with. With that said have you thought of using the GM 883 gear box? You can column shift the 4 forward gears and a simple out of view cable will work reverse. That will give you overdrive, bolt to a cheep (speedway) adapter keeping your stock clutch linkage and fit in the 40 X member. When looking in the window nobody will know.
    The Wizzard
     
    need louvers ? and olscrounger like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.