Features Roadster Pickup........picture thread

Rocker. I have a diamond block in mine also . The one I posted on page 33 . Are you going to put fenders back on or leave them off?

 

No fenders for this one gotta lose all the weight it can so I can go really fast...

 

I certainly didn't intend to offend anybody. In my view, Grabowski and Ivo defined the abbreviated T rpu form, and any T truck that resembles them qualifies as a fad T. The car in the picture is a T roadster with an abbreviated bed, so I used the language most familiar to me.

Is the truck yours? I'd still like to see it with the panels closed up.

 

No that roadster pickup isn't mine, I wouldn't mind if it was.

However, you are wrong in your thinking and your ***umption on what a Fad T is.

Early builds like Grabowski and Ivo and others who used the abbreviated pickup beds built cl***ic T based hot rods, not Fad Ts.

Any hot rod truck RPU that resembles them does NOT qualify as a Fad T

The stupid looking Fad T thing with all the unnecessary extra **** came along later and were caricatures of what a cl***ic hot rod was and should be.
Things like tall tall windshields and tops along with huge blowers on top of the engine and motorcycle wheels on the front with no brakes ,steam roller rear tires and br*** lamps and angel fuzz , garish paint...etc....

A T based hot rod RPU with a short bed is not a Fad T.
If you want to educate yourself, go here :

http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/the-bucket-of-ugly-a-de-uglifying-thread.824491/

There's lots of talk and discussion on what a cl***ic T hot rod is all about.
Read enjoy and educate yourself.

 

There's a good start.

 

Oh, no. That wouldn't be *****ing. You are simply informing people who may be dumb***es. In fact, those kinds of people need to be *****ed at. I know. I am a psychologist.

 

Sits right.

 

You're pretty argumentative about this kind of stuff, aren't you? I don't need much education on the subject; I first saw the Grabowski and Ivo cars when they were new, and you were still in diapers.

No, those cars were not Fad T's, because they invented the style. And they were hardly cl***ics; how could they be when they were the first of their kind? They certainly started a trend, and so many people copied them that the "Fad" term was coined to describe those imitators. If you prefer, I could call them "copycat T's". While I don't understand why you are indignant about the use of the Fad T description, I repeat that I didn't intend to insult anybody.

As far as cl***ic T hot rods are concerned, this was mine. IMO it's a whole lot closer to a cl***ic than any short-bed pickup:

While we're giving advice, I suggest that you might exercise more caution before saying that someone else is wrong for having a different interpretation of "Fad T" than your OPINION.

 

Thumbs up 50Fraud!

 

Very nice little roadster, I love it.
Would it have been any less nice with a small bed on the back instead of the little turtle deck ? Or even nothing but a fuel tank modified style ?
Or any less fun ?

The cars built in that style are cl***ic hot rods even if they are fitted with a short bed.

Argumentative ? Me ? No, opinionated maybe , but aren't we all ?

My definition of Fad T isn't only my own.
And definitely isn't just my opinion.

The term never really came around till the numerous kit car companies jumped on the bandwagon and they were selling them to everyone who wanted one.
They became a Fad and the styles were perverted and exaggerated.

When I think Fad T's I think of these ugly caricatures.



So, in the end I don't care when you quit wearing diapers, all that means is that you may be closer than I am to getting back into them

I still think my definition of a Fad T is more accurate.

All in all it doesn't make a big difference anyway, I'm p***ionate about what I like, and don't like.
As long as we're having fun that's all that matters isn't it?

I bet there are times you wish you still owned the little roadster, I bet it was a fun car.
Larry.

 

In the early '50s I saw a small number of roadsters on the street that were clearly derived from the look of track roadsters. I decided a looong time ago that the track roadster style was what I liked best, especially the pre-'26 turtledeck style.

Unfortunately I didn't get mine until I was pushing 70. If I had bought the car at 30 or 40, I think it might have been a better pairing. At 70, if I drove it hard, it scared the **** out of me. Fun, absolutely, but scary fun.

I certainly agree with you that the circus wagons you posted are a terrible corruption of the earlier Normie/Tommy style. I'd still like to see that Shadow Rods thing with all the panels closed -- looks like it's a pretty nice, understated car.

 

I hope my project turns out half as nice as these. I started out with a rather rusty 1924 dodge roadster cowl, handmade the doors. used the back of a 28 chevy sedans for the rear, model a bed, and a 29 chevy frame. It will be full fendered using the parts from the 28 chevy gathering parts for now.

 

I'm in agreement with you on that.
I'm trying to get my project done before I'll be too scared to drive it
I'd like to get some fun out of it.

 

I'm glad we got that settled, sort of. Can we get back to RPU's now?

 

Yes, as that is what, this thread is all about!

I susspect, this is the afformantioned Salt Scorcher, found on Instagram:




Keep 'em kruzin!
Dannerr

 

Hello,
Nick Macaluso from Goleta, CA has bevy of custom hot rods in his ****nal. This RPU was a prime example of the quality of the builds from Nick, Project Design, and Big Hearted Ken near the airport in Goleta. The style, look, accessories are all timeless, as it could fit in any year build or time period of hot rod history from the late 50’s to the early 70’s. The 301 SBC sounded ready for the races, but it was a very cool ride on the streets.

Jnaki (the ***le caption is not my spelling...)

While on this photo shoot, the weather was beautiful, the atmosphere was lush, and all this time I was thinking that I really like this RPU. It had everything that I would have put on any RPU build.

Other than that red RPU that some “HS kid” had on the cover of HRM back in 1962, this is the one other roadster pickup I would like to own. We would have driven the daylights out of it, cruising up/down the Pacific coastline. Besides, this was also one of my wife’s favorite hot rods and we all know women can’t be wrong…Ha!

(Other builds from prior threads for Nick Macaluso: 40-41 Ford Sedan Delivery thread)

 

I got a Hot rod Ford and two dollars bill!

 

I'd sure like to see more pics of this one. Very much along the lines of my intended direction for the pile of parts in my driveway

 

Big fan of this one as a kid as well. In 1/24 scale at the time. The Monogram "early iron" series version HAD to have been based on this truck

 

Hey Brad,
This one? It certainly looks like the same truck. Those Monogram designers must have been scouring the car mags for new ideas. It was a beautiful RPU and it sounded quite nice.
Jnaki
I am still looking for other color/b&w photos of this RPU in my files. Most of those car files were lost in the many house moves, but a couple of boxes of color slides stayed in an obscure storage box full of 60's memorabilia.

 

That'd be the one. I've got an unbuilt one on the shelf right now. I'd love to see more pics of it

 

I built one of those.

 

The thread on the Charles "Chuck" Sugden rpu, the Salt Scorcher:

http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/index.php?threads/Salt-Scorcher.649966/


Keep 'em kruzin!
Dannerr

 

Great, thanks. Now that I see it, I'm pretty sure I had read that thread, but the pile of parts for aforementioned project was a fairly new arrival at my house at that point, so I had no intended direction at that point.

 

bump!!

 

Looking forward to when mine is back together. JW

 

A few more.

 

Love the green 28/9 and the black one belongs to a mate here in NZ, the car lives State side. JW

 

The two red ones are cool.
The gray one ain't right.