Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Should I fear the Dynaflow and Buick torque tube?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by HRS, Mar 22, 2017.

  1. HRS
    Joined: Nov 7, 2008
    Posts: 362

    HRS
    Member

    I am looking at a Buick with a dynaflow and torque tube...but I am a bit fearful.

    Not looking for a performance, but I would like to cruise at highway speeds.

    My concern is that should something go wrong with the dynaflow/torque tube set-up isn't exactly easy to fix or swap out.

    Is the dynaflow good for cruising? Are my fears overblown?
     
  2. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,356

    Hnstray
    Member
    from Quincy, IL

    You are correct that that setup is not 'repair friendly'. However, thousands upon thousands of Buicks with that system drove millions of miles (collectively) all over the Country without catastrophic failures.

    If the vehicle in question is in generally good mechanical condition, drive it and enjoy it, especially as an urban/suburban Cruiser.

    Ray
     
    Atwater Mike likes this.
  3. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,756

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    Gee it's easy to answer a question when you give so much specific detail. A Dynaflow Buick with torque tube could be anything from a 1949 248 straight eight with 120HP, to a 1959 401V8 with 324HP. Highway speed could be anything from 60 in the country to 80 on a meat axey 8 lane hiway.

    Yes, you can get a Buick with torque tube and Dynaflow that will cruise at highway speeds. Mostly they are reliable but if one needs service, it is not easy or cheap.
     
  4. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

    NO! you should only fear the Reaper
     
  5. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,559

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yes. One killed my entire family once, just for looking at it.
     
    Doug F., 302GMC and Hnstray like this.
  6. leon bee
    Joined: Mar 15, 2017
    Posts: 1,315

    leon bee
    Member

    Cruise about as fast as you want, man. There are some details:leaky seal at back of trans lets ATF into the torque tube. Not a problem in itself, but when it fills a leaky pinion seal lets ATF into the rear. Then it all might leak out thru the wheel bearing seals. I don't know about late fifties, earlier has a packed wheel bearing in between two seals.

    All that stuff is repairable, parts available. Pinion seal is buried in there pretty deep.
     
  7. HRS
    Joined: Nov 7, 2008
    Posts: 362

    HRS
    Member

    1949, 248 S8. Highway speed 70mph.
     
  8. HRS
    Joined: Nov 7, 2008
    Posts: 362

    HRS
    Member

    My condolences...;)
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  9. The same set-up lives under thousands of early Chevys, Ramblers, etc.
    Keep up the lube to them, depress right hand pedal, & cruise.
    If you ever want to go to an open drive, then you have a bit of work ahead. (Change trans, rear axle, etc)
     
  10. Bearing Burner
    Joined: Mar 2, 2009
    Posts: 1,208

    Bearing Burner
    Member
    from W. MA

    When ATF gets in the rear end You can burn the ring & pinion. Don't ask how I know.
     
  11. Wallaby
    Joined: Jan 21, 2007
    Posts: 51

    Wallaby
    Member

    The Dynaflow is kinda weird. It takes a while to get used to. I had a '56 with that setup and a 322 4bbl; it was very reliable for cruising, but not much punch for acceleration. Mine had the variable pitch stator in the torque converter... it was a way of giving high stall when the throttle was opened to let the engine rev up.
    It was a pretty ingenious way of making it all work with only one forward gear. The car was big and heavy, and it drove a bit like a jet ski. You would give ample throttle, and the engine would speed up... then you wait for the car to catch up. Once you were in motion all was good. I never had a problem with mine.
    I thought about changing to a modern "shifting" transmission, but that would be a big project as the entire rear would need to be re-engineered.
     
  12. plym49
    Joined: Aug 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,802

    plym49
    Member
    from Earth

    Heck no!

    The rod in my avatar had a '53 322 Buick, '53 Dynaflow, and torque tube back to a 32 Banjo.

    It was dependable and bulletproof.

    Gas mileage is not the best but that is to be expected as it is a true turbine transmission.

    Low range kicks *** - you must manually shift into high, at least in '53.
     
  13. HRS
    Joined: Nov 7, 2008
    Posts: 362

    HRS
    Member

    Any advice on how to check if the rear end has been filled with ATF? I'd imagine it would be tough to spot the rear seal leak without the bar being warmed up and driven.

    Any other suggestions at to what warning signs to look for or how to check them?


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  14. BuckeyeBuicks
    Joined: Jan 4, 2010
    Posts: 2,773

    BuckeyeBuicks
    Member
    from ohio

    Remove the plug on the rear end cover, if fluid runs out the rear seal on the trans and pinion seal is shot. That probably means replacing all the seals from the rear of the trans on back and maybe the rear wheel bearings and rear brakes. Not cheap and alot of work. But hey, its a Buick-its worth it!
     
  15. leon bee
    Joined: Mar 15, 2017
    Posts: 1,315

    leon bee
    Member

    Here is some more Buick info: it's good to know what's getting in the tube, gear lube or ATF. If you buy the car, drill and tap a small hole in bottom of tube right before it meets the rear housing. Gear lube thru the pinion seal into the tube, well no big deal- it'll find it's own level.

    Atf in there, well it'll get high enough to bleed into the differential, probably even if that pinion seal isn't too bad otherwise.

    Me,..........well I got both fluids in there, so I'm gonna have to do something like it or not.

    I just got this idea from the geezers over at the Buick forum. Kinda thing I'd like to believe I'd think of it myself. But I hadn't yet.
     
  16. In 1960 I worked for a guy who decided to learn automatic transmissions. We got a '57 Buick with a dead Dynaflow. He decided he could repair it. I pulled that miserable S.O.B. 3 times before he got it to work. I was never so pissed in my whole life!
     
  17. I didn't like mine!!!!Bruce. HPIM2057.JPG
     
  18. Hyway speed? How fast you wanna go?

    Ben
     
  19. leon bee
    Joined: Mar 15, 2017
    Posts: 1,315

    leon bee
    Member

    Here's one of those geezers now. Howdy Ben!
     
  20. LONG
    Joined: Aug 20, 2011
    Posts: 292

    LONG
    Member

    lotta good folks in the buick forum. cruising is ok. I put on around 4000 miles a year on my 52. I cruise 65-75 mph. wish it was open driveline and cheaper/ easier to find parts for.
     
  21. wicarnut
    Joined: Oct 29, 2009
    Posts: 9,215

    wicarnut
    Member

    We have a 51 Roadmaster (restored stock) when purchased, I saw Dynaflow was leaking in back, torque ball deal. After reading and asking around, heard some real BS and horror stories on $$$ Dynaflow repair, so I bought a factory manual, great info, pretty clear on how to roll rear end back to repair/replace torque ball. Bought a repair kit/seals from a Buick parts house and fixed it, not that bad of a project and magic, no leak. We drive this car at 55-65 to shows, goes down road nice, even with the bias ply wide whites. It's not a rocket, but it's surely smooth. All/most cars, I believe had enclosed drive lines into 40's-50's, so no worries on that subject.
     
  22. leon bee
    Joined: Mar 15, 2017
    Posts: 1,315

    leon bee
    Member

    When I mentioned the Buick forum, I shoulda said that I'm a geezer myself. Just not as smart as many of them.
     
  23. The variable pitch Dynaflow in my '58 Roadmaster pulled a knife on me the first time I rolled under there. I think the car belonged to a Mexican once. LOL

    We did everything but run the dynaflow in my '58 Roadmaster without fluid and could not hurt it. We even run an cammed up 364 in front of it. The Buick went to the wrecking yard when we were done with it and got parted out. The engine went in a friends model 40 Ford, the seats ( roll and tuck) went in a '58 Impala and the transmission ended up in another Buick. I know for a fact that the transmission was still working 3 years after it changed cars. Of course that was 40+ years ago.
     
    firstinsteele likes this.
  24. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,756

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    Buick used torque tube because it made it easier to use coil springs in the rear. This is the secret to the legendary Buick marshmallow ride.

    Other cars that used torque tube include Chevrolet, Ford, Mercury, Lincoln, the large Nashs like the Amb***ador, and many luxury cars of the 20s and also large luxurious European cars like Rolls Royce Daimler and Minerva.
     
  25.  
  26. Back about '53 I was in a Cub Scout troop. A bunch of us were being transported somewhere by one of the guys' mother in her Buick Convertible, about a '51 or '52. Someone thought it would be cool to see how fast the Buick would go, and after some coaxing, the mom put the pedal to the metal. I was in the middle of the front seat and it was my job to watch the speedo and announce when it hit 100. Well, it did and I yelled out the news, much to the delight of all the Cubs. Don't know if any of the parents ever got word of that escapade, but I know if that happened today, it would be lawsuit city! I know it was capable of 100 though.
     
    Hnstray likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.