Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Spring Rates

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by PHIL COOPY, Jan 24, 2017.

  1. PHIL COOPY
    Joined: Jul 20, 2016
    Posts: 409

    PHIL COOPY
    Member Emeritus

    I'm sort of confused about spring rates as they apply to hot rods. I understand the measurement but I am confused as to what rate I should use in the rear with rod as light as my 27 T Tudor build. I am trying to use coil spring suspension.
     
  2. wicarnut
    Joined: Oct 29, 2009
    Posts: 9,215

    wicarnut
    Member

    Have some experience w/ coil over shock type, Speedway has a big selection and a chart w/ suggestion's. I bought Carrera springs at Behlings Circle Track, Butler Wi. The rate you use changes w/ angle of shock, believe 30 deg is recommended standard, car came with a verticle rear shock setup on my 29 Highboy and ended up w/ #100 for comfort (had #180) when driving home after purchase, at 50 miles, stopped let the tires down, had 36 psi, was knocking my fillings loose, changed springs next, still a POS for comfort, but got it good as it could be. From what I remember from reading/research and your shocks are on an angle #120 might be a good starting point, hopefully a ch***is expert on here will jump in and give you a better guess on rate
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2017
  3. GearheadsQCE
    Joined: Mar 23, 2011
    Posts: 3,670

    GearheadsQCE
    Alliance Vendor

    There are probably guys on here that can give you a good estimate based on experience. Since I have never had a T bucket, I would start by having the car weighed. If you know any circle track guys they will know who has scales. You can also go to the local commercial scales (junk yard etc.) and weigh the front back, and whole car. (The two ends should equal the total car weight.)
    You can calculate spring rates with math and geometry but you will likely be happiest with springs that will just hold the car up. The weight of the car should compress the spring approximately 1/2 of it's unloaded, installed length. My guess would be that you could be looking at 90 or even 80 pounds/inch of compression.
     
  4. mgtstumpy
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 9,279

    mgtstumpy
    Member

  5. continentaljohn
    Joined: Jul 24, 2002
    Posts: 5,883

    continentaljohn
    Member

    I will throw my 2cents in and say 120 pounds or so. The one thing I would recommend is get a good set. I love American coil overs and for a few reasons. The first time I bought a set was over 20 years ago and new to using the coil over setup. I blew the spring rate and had a **** ride . I called them and asked a few more questions and then they corrected me on my rate figures. They exchanged the spring I had for the one I needed no questions asked and no cost, wow who does that! The coil overs are still on the car and ride great.
    The first being a great company standing behind there product and quality of ride and product. I also would say its warranty and no BS and lifetime you own the product I believe. Then of course it's made in the great USA and look great.
    On a short wheelbase low weight car as such it will be a challenge to dial in both performance and quality ride . So I recommend a lighter rate



     
    wicarnut likes this.
  6. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,413

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    In the center chart above, anyone want to hazard a guess why the front and rear spring rates recommended are so much different when the actual weight on the wheels is the same? I'm guessing it's some sort of compensation for the engine, but if there's only 1200 lbs on the front end and the same 1200 lbs over the rear wheels (an ideal 50/50 wt distro) why does the front end need so much stronger springs? Gary
     
  7. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,214

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    o_O Me too..I did call QA1 and asked what I should use for 50/50 and was told start with the same spring rate all around..
     
  8. GearheadsQCE
    Joined: Mar 23, 2011
    Posts: 3,670

    GearheadsQCE
    Alliance Vendor

    Gary,
    My guess would be heavier springs on front due to weight transfer under braking. We could also talk about polar moment of inertia and center of gravity, but I don't want to.:D
     
  9. King ford
    Joined: Mar 18, 2013
    Posts: 1,477

    King ford
    Member
    from 08302

    The stiffer end of the car will slide out first when cornering aggressively, if the front is stiffer the car will slide the front wheels, what racers( that go around corners) call understeer or pushing witch is a lot more predictable than oversteer or "loose" when the tail p***es the nose!
     
  10. spiffy1937
    Joined: Apr 9, 2006
    Posts: 733

    spiffy1937
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Florida

    Seems like the front rates might be for an independent suspension.
     
  11. pragmatist
    Joined: Jul 5, 2010
    Posts: 49

    pragmatist
    Member

    The front springs on an upper and lower A arm suspension are working on a lever being the lower arm. The back springs are not. Also if your springs lower to half the unloaded amount you will bottom out those springs just getting out of the driveway. Ideally you want the spring to compress about 20% loaded
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.