Register now to get rid of these ads!

Remember the 70's?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Silva, Apr 12, 2006.

  1. Silva
    Joined: Apr 28, 2005
    Posts: 496

    Silva
    Member

    What if? what if gas price$ continue to soar. Will we see 4-cyl rods..like we did in 70's HotRod magazines? :eek:
     
  2. Royalshifter
    Joined: May 29, 2005
    Posts: 15,625

    Royalshifter
    Moderator
    from California

    Please don't go there. I beg of you.
     
  3. 53chieftian
    Joined: Aug 13, 2005
    Posts: 611

    53chieftian
    Member

    Thank God I missed most of that! So why would you even want to make us think of such things! I cant take the voices any more!
     
  4. Nik
    Joined: Nov 12, 2005
    Posts: 584

    Nik
    Member

    I think we're already there. It's simple reader demand, people will ask for 6 cylinder and 4 banger build ups, because that's what they will fall back on as drivers to save money. I'm going to start driving my son's 63 Ranchero for this very reason, cool body and economical engine. As long as they don't bring back those ugly ass paint jobs we should escape with our sanity. LOL

    Nik
     
  5. Flatman
    Joined: Dec 20, 2005
    Posts: 1,975

    Flatman
    Member

    I don't know, four bangers (Flathead) and inline sixes are kinda cool....
    But those funky, air brush paintjobs with the copies of Boris prints... They gotta go!:D

    Flatman
     
  6. RODMAN58
    Joined: Jan 1, 2006
    Posts: 271

    RODMAN58
    Member
    from VIRGINIA

    I loved all 3 of my Pintos. Those "cars" were a lifetime away from my 71 caddy. The purists will stay pure.
    Rod
     
  7. American Rodder has said that a 27 track T with an eco-tech engine will be built on the pages of Street Rod Builder. Total Performance is in on it too.
     
  8. 2-TONED
    Joined: Jan 31, 2005
    Posts: 1,683

    2-TONED
    Member

    ever notice when theres a big gas price increase that BiG block chevies (blocks, heads, complete engines etc...) go UP in price too!!?!!? :eek:
    why is this? --- yep i think we will see more 4s & 6s pop up in cars.
     
  9. sgary
    Joined: Dec 6, 2004
    Posts: 109

    sgary
    Member

    I 'm thinking about using a Toyota 22R, I got it for free and it's in good shape.Gas here is $1.20 a liter. Anyone used one of these engines?
     
  10. DocWatson
    Joined: Mar 24, 2006
    Posts: 10,288

    DocWatson
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Sgary you are paying Aussy prices now!! I riding my little motorcycle now, mothballed the cars.
    Doc
     
  11. brandon
    Joined: Jul 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,369

    brandon
    Member


    i have a 'yota 20r and 5 speed in my track t project.....had the car for 11 years....and still haven't got it going yet.....and at the rate i'm going ....it will probably be another 11 before its done.......focus......gotta stay focused.....haha brandon
     
  12. Bigcheese327
    Joined: Sep 16, 2001
    Posts: 6,701

    Bigcheese327
    Member

    Because if you don't care about fuel economy, you might as well really not care.
     
  13. tjm73
    Joined: Feb 17, 2006
    Posts: 3,532

    tjm73
    Member

    Yes.

    And that talk about purists stayign true to V8's is hooey. People will soup up what they can afford just as they did "back in the day". Can't afford the big V8 and it's fuel and maintence needs? Then they build a small, light 4 or 6 powered runner. It's a natural progression of things.

    I've thought about building an oddball, but common as dirt 3.0 Essex V6 Ford (think mid 90's Ranger) with a custom intake and totally stock internals and/or about a naturally aspirated 2.3 Ford in a closed cab pickup or a sedan of the Model A persuaysion (sp?) and when money allows I can swap it out to a V8 that I'll have waiting in the wings. Just ideas. But yeah I think 4 and 6 powered rods will become more common again with the higher gas prices. V8's will always be around though.
     
  14. Frank
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 2,325

    Frank
    Member

    I've got a 2.0 A/T out of a Capri and a 2.3 4spd out of a Courier. Both run well and they are free. If they weren't, I wouldn't even give it a second thought, but I figure I can go ahead and build my rpu using one of these and swap in a V8 later when I have the money. I am planning to make the rpu modular so that it will have motor and tranny mounts adjustable so that most swaps will require little more than unbolting/bolting whatever transplant I choose. I'm planning the same thing for the body to go with a couple of different styles but leaving the cowl and doors permanently attached.
     
  15. flynstone
    Joined: Aug 14, 2005
    Posts: 1,747

    flynstone
    Member

    the old 6sixs dont get that good of miliage.................
     
  16. tjm73
    Joined: Feb 17, 2006
    Posts: 3,532

    tjm73
    Member

    My '90 Mustang GT when it was stock got like 24 or 25 mpg in a heavy under geared car (convertible). Car Craft put together a 302 with a Weiand Stealth intake, AFR Aluminum heads, and the OEM factory cam and got 405 hp at the crank and I'd bet it still got good gas mileage. In something light it would haul A. Something like a Model A with a stickshift perhaps.
     
  17. flynj1
    Joined: Mar 4, 2001
    Posts: 583

    flynj1
    Member
    from C.B. IOWA

    My 34 chevy tub has had a 4.3 v6 chevy for 5 years and I like it
     
  18. REJ
    Joined: Mar 4, 2004
    Posts: 1,612

    REJ
    Member
    from FLA

    GOD! I guess I'm ahead of the times then. I've been running a six in my modified for 5 years now.:eek:
     
  19. Tuck
    Joined: May 14, 2001
    Posts: 5,841

    Tuck
    Tech Editor
    from MINNESOTA
    1. Early Hemi Tech

    Fuel economy and hot rods are like oil and water...

    I wont let the fuel price dictate the way I build.
     
  20. CruZer
    Joined: Jan 24, 2003
    Posts: 1,934

    CruZer
    Member


    I think that's the SBC of the future. It fits in anything and has tons of torque.
     
  21. hemi
    Joined: Jul 11, 2001
    Posts: 1,959

    hemi
    Member

    What fuel economy are you hoping to get out of a hot rod??
    I don't understand why anyone would go through all of the trouble to implement something that they didn't want. Free or not free I would never stuff a v6 in anything, much less a 2.0 banger. By the time you get done fabbing up all of the parts, and actually drive it, is the mileage going to justify anything?

    My gi-normous 73 Plymouth got 19-21 MPG with a two-barrelled 318 and it weighs nearly 5000 pounds. I can't help but think that one could gain something by stuffing that same V8 into a hot rod that weighs a third less and not see a bearable amount of gas mileage. Keep your foot off the floorboard, drive easy, buy less beer and fast food.

    Cheap? You can find a running Chevy/Buick/Ford V8 car for well under $500 all day long if you know where to look....engine, trans, rearend all in one whack. With a 200R4 or a 700R4 and some freeway gears in the rear, mileage should be just fine...what does your daily driver get?

    Screw the 70's gas crap, why waste your time and energy? Build the motor that you want, run it hard and don't look back. Gas money in a hot rod should not take a priority over making a hot rod. They don't call them warm-rods...
     
  22. Gotgas
    Joined: Jul 22, 2004
    Posts: 7,196

    Gotgas
    Member
    from DFW USA

    Hot Rod Magazine is all over the GM Ecotec, going so far as to say it's the "small block of the new millenium" or something like that. :rolleyes: I don't think so. It's stout, it has already run over 200mph, and is capable of stupid power - I think around 700 with a stock block and crank. But if it still buzzes like a bumblebee, I don't want it in a hot rod...
     
  23. Landmule
    Joined: Apr 14, 2003
    Posts: 462

    Landmule
    Member

    Although it isn't traditional, I've wanted to swap a Turbo T-bird motor into my 4 cylinder Ranger for a while. The 2.3 Fords are a dime a dozen and they run forever. If you're running an injected modern mill in a traditional styled ride - just keep your mouth and your hood shut! Who will know?
     
  24. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,599

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    how about a 4.3 Chevy V8? oh....they call it a 265....
     

    Attached Files:

  25. DrJ
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 9,419

    DrJ
    Member

    Chevy put a 262" SBC V8 (that's 4.3 L) in the mid 70's Monzas...right in the middle of the so-called gas "shortage" (It was FAKE!)
    I put a new in the crate 262" V8 in my 40 GMC five years ago.
    Haven't regretted it yet. :D :cool:
     
  26. Landmule
    Joined: Apr 14, 2003
    Posts: 462

    Landmule
    Member

    The more I think about this the more it bothers me. I've been thinking of building a custom van too. I want one of those short wheelbase early 80's Econolines with the 300 six and the overdrive stick shift trans. Suede with red steelies, signed and striped and a 56 F100 Grill. Does anyone think that this and the turbo tbird motor thing could be the early signs of a mental breakdown!
     
  27. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,599

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    no it's just a sign that you need to find some other forums to frequent in addition to the hamb.
     
  28. DrJ
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 9,419

    DrJ
    Member

    The deal, around here anyway, wasn't the price of gas ,but the availability of it.
    The gas companies invented a gas shortage, why I don't know, I think the idea was so people would plead with them to sell them gallons at 78.9¢ a gallon instead of 29.9¢ like it had been?

    Anyway, the fuckinggovernment made odd/even days that you could buy gas according to your license plate, and of course, both my cars were even so I couldnt buy gas in one, siphon and transfer it to the other and fill up again so as did about everyone I had to watch how far I drove for fear of getting stuck dry.
    And "even" sucked at the end of a 31 day month because then there were two odd days in a row! :mad:
    SO, it wasn't a case of a small engine as much as a really big gas tank!
    Which I had in the '60 Chevy long roof, but as someone mentioned, inline sixes don't get as good a mileage as a mild V8.
    Has to do with the length of the intake runners and gas falling out of vapor on the way to thw end cylinders I think.
    And the other car was a '67 VW with a Porsche 914 engine...small tank, guzzler engine. :(
    And traveling salesmen were screwed, they couldn't make their stops or service any great area at all.
    And forget going on a driving vacation.. you could only drive every other day.
    By the end of it people were GLAD to pay double the price...and all of a sudden, there wasn't a gas shortage any more...Imagine that?


    And then there was that idiotic 55 mph speed limit...
    You ever try to keep it down to 55 mph on the I-80?
    Don't get me started...
     
  29. hemi
    Joined: Jul 11, 2001
    Posts: 1,959

    hemi
    Member


    It's more like GM is alll over Hot Rod Magazine....

    GM is giving away plenty to people who want to play. California Street Rods and the like do a great job on P.R. for GM. (Not a bad thing.)

    The echo tech is a stout little motor. However, I don't think 200mph is hard for any high-revving little engine in the right vehicle, and visually, there is something to be said about having valve covers and headers on each side.
    Hot rods do a lot to feed the eyeballs too...

    And I'm sure that maxed out to 700 hp, the mileage is crap.

    :D
     
  30. Thumper
    Joined: Mar 7, 2005
    Posts: 1,610

    Thumper
    Member

    Remember the 70's ??? Hell no........I was still fucked up from the 60's !!:eek:
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.