Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Best intake manifold for street driven 283?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Jasper6120, Oct 6, 2017.

  1. Jasper6120
    Joined: Jul 18, 2007
    Posts: 502

    Jasper6120
    Member
    from Australia

    Hey Hambers

    I’m building up a 283 SBC and the last piece of the puzzle I need to address is the intake manifold. I’d like to hear your opinions on what would be the best manifold for good torque and economy this engine.

    283 SBC 60 thou over
    416 Heads
    Quadrajet Carb
    RV cam. Rev range: idle - 4500rpm
    Headers
    HEI distributor
    T5 Box: Cruising RPM - 2000rpm
    Curb weight of car: 3000lbs

    I was considering the Edelbrock Performer, but they are designed around the 350 so I thought the plenum might be too big for this little 283. Thoughts?

    Cheers in advance!


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  2. s55mercury66
    Joined: Jul 6, 2009
    Posts: 4,367

    s55mercury66
    Member
    from SW Wyoming

    I really think the Performer would be a good choice with the Quadrajet myself, but I don't have any experience with one on a 283.
     
  3. Boyd Wylie
    Joined: Oct 29, 2010
    Posts: 746

    Boyd Wylie
    Member

    Edelbrock's claim for the Performer is 262 -400 cubic inch
     
  4. 56sedandelivery
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 6,694

    56sedandelivery
    Member Emeritus

    You're very limited with using your Quadrajet carburetor in regards to an intake manifold. The Performer is probably the best choice, followed by a factory 305/350 Quadrajet intake; the earlier the better as far as smog hookup ports and such. Otherwise, you're going to need an adapter to bolt the Quadrajet to any open plenum or square port intake. Plus, there are plenty of Performers out there for sale on the used market. I am Butch/56sedandelivery.
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  5. I have a 70's edelbrock with smaller runners not sure if it's better for smaller motors or not.
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  6. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,598

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    GM Z28 or LT1 # 3959594 Intake.
    or if you can't find one of these, a Holley Street Dominator [a generic copy] GM 3959594 manifold.jpg Holley Street Dominator.jpg
     
    1Nimrod, 327Eric and Old wolf like this.
  7. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,664

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    I put an Edlebrock SP2P on my stock 305 daily with Qjet. Made a noticeable improvement in low end torque. 4500 rpm upper limit iirc. Don't know about mileage.
     
  8. That's the one I have also.
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  9. southcross2631
    Joined: Jan 20, 2013
    Posts: 4,412

    southcross2631
    Member

    The aluminum 305 intake would be a good choice . Edelbrock performer or SP2P or even an old torque will work. Weiand makes a nice dual plane for small blocks. Have used it on 305's and 307's.
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  10. I have used the Z 28 intake and the edelbrock C4B on 283,s and they worked great. The 300 Hp 327 cast iron intake and carter AFB is a good choice also. For a street engine I would use a dual plane intake.
     
    1Nimrod, slowmotion and 1stGrumpy like this.
  11. I have to agree with Old Wolf, I have a stock intake and Carter AFB on my '57 and it does just fine, but I am nearly 70 years old and all mine has to be able to do is 35 mph in the fast lane and I'm happy!

    32.JPG
     
    1Nimrod, pat59 and 13lav like this.
  12. TerrytheK
    Joined: Sep 12, 2004
    Posts: 1,636

    TerrytheK
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I've used the Edelbrock Performer dual plane intake on a couple of mild street 283 Chevs and I'd have no issue running another one. For my use they worked great. But I also ran square bore carbs, no Quadrajets. If you do decide on a factory 305 aluminum Q-jet intake as others have mentioned, I've got one kicking around my garage that you could have, if you wanna pay for the shipping...
    Which might be a little steep to where you are.... ? :eek:
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  13. 42merc
    Joined: Dec 19, 2010
    Posts: 979

    42merc
    Member

    IMO any stock iron intake & a Quadrajet will do what needs to be done on a near stock 283.
    If you need aluminum, paint it silver.
     
  14. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,929

    squirrel
    Member

    I would use a late 60s factory iron Qjet intake.

    I dont know if it's best, though.
     
    upspirate likes this.
  15. if you want a front oil fill use a Edelbrock C4B....if not, the Performer will be fine on the 283. i have both on 28'3 right now
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  16. I would use a Performer or a stock aluminum 305/350, as stated. You want a direct Q-jet bolt up.
    The SP2P might give you better mileage, depending on the rpm range you plan to run it at.
    You'd want to run the 283 a bit higher than say, a 305.
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  17. If you go this route , make sure you get the tin plate that goes on first over the carb mount, and use it, then the correct gasket.
     
  18. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,929

    squirrel
    Member

    The shim goes over the gasket, doesn't it? :)
     
  19. No. You would think that , but it's supposed to seal the exh. gas against the manifold, and then the gasket seals the carb vacuum and signal. Seams strange, I know.
    Late 400 Pontiacs had them too, to re-direct the EGR gases.

    * NOTE..I see where the Corvette guys are saying the gasket goes on first, then the plate. Then they are recommending a second gasket, which would make sense.
    I know I've taken apart original 350/295's that the plate was on first.

    *NOTE 2. The late Pontiac one definitely goes on first with no gasket, then the thick Q-jet gasket.

    This is all academic, if you are blocking the exhaust from the heads.
    I probably wouldn't do that, depending on how and where you are planning to drive.
     
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2017
    302GMC likes this.
  20. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,929

    squirrel
    Member

    heh...well, I guess we can disagree, but the gasket does go on first :)
     
  21. Looks like you're right, as usual;)
    Still seems strange, either way. LOL
     
  22. For a street driver especially in cold weather you need the heat crossover under the carb working and you need the heat rizer valve in the exhaust working also. My first 55 chevy had a 56 265 block bored to 283 & flat top pistons without any valve reliefs. a 097 cam Ram Horn exhaust and a extensively reworked set of 57 power pack heads. Topped by a carter afb & intake from a 300 hp 327. It ran pretty good. until I blew a piston completely apart.
     
    1Nimrod and ZBoyz3 like this.
  23. Jasper6120
    Joined: Jul 18, 2007
    Posts: 502

    Jasper6120
    Member
    from Australia

    Some great info here. The Edelbrock Performers are in plentiful supply round these parts so I'll probably go that route. Good to know that its a solid choice for this little motor. Cheap, good, available. Works for me :)
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  24. scrappybunch
    Joined: Nov 16, 2011
    Posts: 439

    scrappybunch
    Member
    from nj

    Another plus for the SP2P. It really helps with the low end torque. Only problem is finding a decent one.
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  25. Dooley
    Joined: May 29, 2002
    Posts: 3,100

    Dooley
    Member
    from Buffalo NY

    Edelbrock C3B
    I have one I was saving for my 283 build with the notched plenum divider milled down
     
  26. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.