Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Whats a 337 flathead worth nowadays?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Shane Spencer, Mar 17, 2018.

  1. 52Muntz
    Joined: Jan 13, 2017
    Posts: 44

    52Muntz
    Member
    from PNW

    Gotta ask ... an 50’s/60’s vintage 392 or the newer 392 Hemi? I assume since you talk about potentially rebuilding the 331 that you’re putting the older 392 in there, but a newer one would be pretty sweet as well.
     
  2. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,619

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    New 392? Don't open the hood...they just don't appear as they used to.
     
  3. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 7,734

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I hear ya' Mike. I've had the hoods open on several new vehicles with hemi's and haven't seen an engine yet!:rolleyes:
     
    pat59, Beanscoot and Clay Belt like this.
  4. 42merc
    Joined: Dec 19, 2010
    Posts: 942

    42merc
    Member

    About the 337--The Queen Mary is still looking for an anchor.
     
  5. MuntzManMike
    Joined: Jul 13, 2017
    Posts: 12

    MuntzManMike
    Member

    Sorry to create a stir! It's a 1957 392 with 10.5:1 pistons. We are using the dual quad setup from the 331. Engine and carbs are freshly rebuilt.
     
    kidcampbell71 and 52Muntz like this.
  6. MuntzManMike
    Joined: Jul 13, 2017
    Posts: 12

    MuntzManMike
    Member

    Also didn't mean to hijack your post 42merc. Good luck on the search.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  7. 52Muntz
    Joined: Jan 13, 2017
    Posts: 44

    52Muntz
    Member
    from PNW

    Whether you want to use the 337 depends on what you want to use it for. I personally like the 337 because it’s unique and not often seen around. It really is a beast of an engine compared to the Ford flatheads. Definite conversation starter - if that’s what you’re going for.

    But if you’re looking for an engine that is relatively cheap to build/upgrade, and makes lots o’ power, the 337 is likely not the best choice. Probably why they aren’t all that expensive to buy. Also make sure whatever you want to put it in has a front suspension that can take all that weight.
     
    Clay Belt likes this.
  8. vetteson
    Joined: Oct 7, 2010
    Posts: 301

    vetteson
    Member

    As I indicated before, my '51 came with no engine but there were many 337 Lincoln parts in the trunk. I gave the intake to a clever friend of mine who turned it into a tri-power intake. Amazing, looks "original". I'll get a picture if there is interest. I'm locked into (happily) a '51 Olds 303 I found complete and cheap. Will have a McCulloch VS-57 supercharger and a Carter WCD 2 barrel in a Kaiser bonnet.
     
    kidcampbell71 and patmanta like this.
  9. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,443

    Beanscoot
    Member

    I'm interested in the picture of the 337 tripower intake.
     
    alanp561 and Clay Belt like this.
  10. Shane Spencer
    Joined: Oct 3, 2009
    Posts: 2,160

    Shane Spencer
    Member

    Tons of cool info on here. Good news, the dude said $150 for the motor. He just wants it outta the way. Im gonna snag it this saturday


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    kidcampbell71, 52Muntz and scotts52 like this.
  11. vetteson
    Joined: Oct 7, 2010
    Posts: 301

    vetteson
    Member

    Just a thought MuntzManMike, M-133 is a very low number, could your car be an early '51? Glendale cars went to about M-126.
     
    cactus1 likes this.
  12. vetteson
    Joined: Oct 7, 2010
    Posts: 301

    vetteson
    Member

    Here's pics of my friends "tri-power" 337 intake he fabricated.
     

    Attached Files:

  13. alanp561
    Joined: Oct 1, 2017
    Posts: 5,180

    alanp561
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    How very cool.
     
  14. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,443

    Beanscoot
    Member

    Yep, he did a bang-up job on that intake. Is it iron or aluminum?
     
  15. khead47
    Joined: Mar 29, 2010
    Posts: 1,789

    khead47
    Member

    ^^^^^^^^^^^ Looks factory !
     
  16. vetteson
    Joined: Oct 7, 2010
    Posts: 301

    vetteson
    Member

    It's based on a factory cast iron single 2-barrel intake.
     
  17. Hemi Joel
    Joined: May 4, 2007
    Posts: 1,610

    Hemi Joel
    Member
    from Minnesota

    If you didn't already, and he still has it, I'd say buy that 337, but try to get a better price. If it is ready to run, or even if it needs a hone and some rings plus a valve grind, it won't be too costly. But if the rod and main bearings are shot, and/or an overbore and pistons, the cost is going to go way up.
    I yanked a337 out of a junk 48 Ford F7 to use in a future project. I have heard lots of rumors as to their weight, anywhere from 700 - 1200 pounds. Since my buddys scales where over at my place, I decided to weigh this thing and see for myself just how portly they actually are. I figured it was best to weigh it bare of any accessories, since lots of guys would be adding their own lighter versions of that stuff. The stock flywheel was 47#, the bellhousing was about 50, the 5 speed syncro trans weighed 240, I left all that off as well as the exhaust manifolds, oil filter, dist, carb, fan, generator and starter. It still has the crank pulley and water pumps on it.

    700 pounds even.

    With a set of aluminum heads and an aluminum intake, it dropped to #635.

    with heads.jpg
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2019
    cactus1, weps and kidcampbell71 like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.