Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Edelbrock 1405 carb

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by tin_indians, Dec 20, 2018.

  1. tin_indians
    Joined: Aug 1, 2011
    Posts: 119

    tin_indians
    Member

    I scored a deal today from a co-worker. I got an Edelbrock EPS Performer intake and the Edelbrock 1405 carb for what I hope is a sweet price.
    Now, I know from searching the web that this Edelbrock is a 600 CFM carb. I have an '86 stock 305 chev engine that had a Rochester QuadraJet on it. Are the carbs close in similarity? Is the Edelbrock going to be too much carb for the 305?
    Never had any experience with 4 bbls...only 2 bbls.
    Thnx.
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  2. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    Is the Edelbrock going to be too much carb for the 305?

    In a word, No.
     
  3. swade41
    Joined: Apr 6, 2004
    Posts: 14,530

    swade41
    Member
    from Buffalo,NY

    ^^^ yeah....what he said ^^^
     
  4. Clay Belt
    Joined: Jun 9, 2017
    Posts: 381

    Clay Belt
    Member

    Fuel mileage will be ****, but it won’t be too much per say. What I will say is I recently swapped a guy a 480cfm carb I had on my 390 for the 600cfm edelbrock he had on his 302 because he was in the single digits for the mpg in his OT truck (197? F100). I would expect a similar situation here.
     
  5. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,397

    sunbeam
    Member

    I like the 1406 tune package better for a street car.
     
  6. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,043

    squirrel
    Member

    I like the Qjet better for a stock small block :)
     
  7. tin_indians
    Joined: Aug 1, 2011
    Posts: 119

    tin_indians
    Member

    I'm pulling the original '54 268 cubic inch straight 8 from my car (in the avitar) and putting in the 305. Roughly 5500 pounds so I'm betting milage won't be the 17 mpg I was getting before the knock started.
     
  8. miker98038
    Joined: Jan 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,600

    miker98038
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Properly tuned either will work. I’ve used a number of 1400 series eddy’s. But if you can find someone who knows how to tune the Qjet, that’s about as good as you’ll get on a street motor.
     
  9. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,561

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'd keep the Q-Jet.

    If not, I'd run a Edelbrock 1403. I ran one on my mildly cammed 305, for years, and got 23mpg average, combined city and freeway.

    Granted, the car was 2300lbs.
     
    Truck64 likes this.
  10. Mike VV
    Joined: Sep 28, 2010
    Posts: 3,329

    Mike VV
    Member
    from SoCal

    Yea, a 500cfm carburetor would be better, but the 600 won't be "too" bad.

    Mike
     
  11. KFC
    Joined: Jul 17, 2008
    Posts: 456

    KFC
    Member
    from UK

    I manage to get 17-21 mpg out of a 1406 on a 350, took a lot of messing about though
     
  12. You can dial the Edelbrock in with one of their kits that has the jets and metering rods. You're going to be on the primary circuit 99% of the time, so it will be fine.
    If you have a Quadrajet, remove it and throw it into the garbage immediately.
     
  13. DOCTOR SATAN
    Joined: Mar 21, 2014
    Posts: 703

    DOCTOR SATAN
    Member
    from okc

    Run the quadra-jet.....
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  14. scrappybunch
    Joined: Nov 16, 2011
    Posts: 441

    scrappybunch
    Member
    from nj

    Another plus for the Q-jet!!!
    Get a A/F monitor and dial it in.
    Part throttle adjustability is as simple as turning a screw.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.