Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects 302 ford engine build

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Jacob1963, Feb 2, 2019.

  1. Jacob1963
    Joined: Jan 30, 2019
    Posts: 15

    Jacob1963
    Member
    from Omaha, Ne

    I’ve got a 1968 ford 302 I’m looking to rebuild and wake up a bit. This will be my first full rebuild/ internally modified engine. I’d like to keep it on pump gas, naturally aspirated and street worthy. Anyone care to give me some of your build specs and part numbers


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    F-ONE and chryslerfan55 like this.
  2. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 16,346

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Too new!!!
     
    Hombre likes this.
  3. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,683

    Boneyard51
    Member

    How can a 302 Ford be too new, when almost every other car here has a 350 Chevy in it , it seems, and the 350 didn’t come out till 1967? Don’t see anyone complaining about the Chevy.

    He said he had a “1968 Ford 302 “ not a 1968 Ford with a 302.




    Bones
     
  4. Jacob1963
    Joined: Jan 30, 2019
    Posts: 15

    Jacob1963
    Member
    from Omaha, Ne

  5. What's your budget? How much power do you want to make? Manual or automatic trans? Power brakes?

    Probably the best single improvement (other than the usual carb/intake) will be a roller hydraulic cam. Which cam grind will depend on the end use. Next best improvement will be better heads.
     
    Deuces, chryslerfan55 and Boneyard51 like this.
  6. fordrodsteven
    Joined: Apr 1, 2017
    Posts: 98

    fordrodsteven
    Member

    RE: TOO NEW!!! When I first came here I got "bitch slapped" for my choices on my car. Therefore I do not share my build or any progress as I keep working on my car. I do, however, lurk at this site and try to share information if I think I can help out someone else with some issue.
     
  7. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,683

    Boneyard51
    Member

    Steven, I too , got jumped on, on my first couple of posts. They were just a “little” off topic. Like most newbys I just scanned the rules. It was a rough start for me. But, I saw the numbers of members here vs other forums. I concluded that due to the number of people involved here, I would have to take the bad with the good. And hopefully there would be a wealth of information here, I was not disappointed, there are “experts” here on virtually every subject.
    What gets me is, there have been many posts here dealing with the decline of our hobby and what we can do to brace it up. Then when a newby comes on and makes a perceived mistake, people jump all over him, I just dont get it, how many good guys have been run off because of that? Just my thoughts.




    Bones
     
    lucky ink, robracer1, Deuces and 4 others like this.
  8. fordrodsteven
    Joined: Apr 1, 2017
    Posts: 98

    fordrodsteven
    Member

    Thanks for the input. My drivetrain is definitely "off topic". I am trying to work within a very short budget and a whole car (for $100) that I could strip for parts was certainly good for me. My interior though will be what people here would call "mild custom" Also my paint will certainly not be stock on the car exterior. So I guess my car would more be considered a custom. I'll just keep lurking about and work my project in my own little world for now.
     
  9. fordrodsteven
    Joined: Apr 1, 2017
    Posts: 98

    fordrodsteven
    Member

    There's lots and lots of information about what you can do with your engine based on what end result you are looking for. There's also many people on the web site who probably don't want to admit it but they are VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE in the Ford 302 engines.
     
    Boneyard51 likes this.
  10. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,683

    Boneyard51
    Member

    Funny how that is........






    Bones
     
    fordrodsteven likes this.
  11. Dangerous Dan
    Joined: Jul 10, 2011
    Posts: 587

    Dangerous Dan
    Member

    Do we have a d---k head here
     
  12. fordrodsteven
    Joined: Apr 1, 2017
    Posts: 98

    fordrodsteven
    Member

    If you're referring to me... then I guess; Absolutely . Yes!
     
    Boneyard51 likes this.
  13. Jacob1963
    Joined: Jan 30, 2019
    Posts: 15

    Jacob1963
    Member
    from Omaha, Ne

    I’ve got no real budget in mind. Power wise 350-400 if reasonable. I be got a c4 I’m planning on using. I’ve got an edlebrock dual plane “performer” idle to 5500 rpm intake I’d like to use as well


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  14. Flathead Dave
    Joined: Mar 21, 2014
    Posts: 4,012

    Flathead Dave
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from So. Cal.

    I had 289. When I rebuilt it, I put in 11-1 pistons and a mild street cam. C-4 trans. Edelbrock Torker Intake with a Holly 600 double pumper. It pumped it up and had a nice lope to it. Placed it into my 1972 Pinto. Food for thought...
     
  15. Flathead Dave
    Joined: Mar 21, 2014
    Posts: 4,012

    Flathead Dave
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from So. Cal.

    I always complain about the 350 in Ford's. If you're going to drive a Ford, keep it a Ford.

    As they say on YAHOO!, "BONEYARD CLAPS BACK"
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2019
  16. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,370

    sunbeam
    Member

    For the most bang for the buck go for a late roller motor that goes for 350 Chevys too. As for to new how many 305 questions have I seen?
     
    Flathead Dave and Boneyard51 like this.
  17. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,683

    Boneyard51
    Member

    Dave , I too dislike the 350 Chevy in the old Fords, mainly because it’s done so often. I understand why they do it, easier fit, cheaper horsepower, etc. But, that’s kinda where hot rodding shines, doing things differently. I don’t bitch anymore when I see the Chevy in a Ford, out loud anyway. But, I do compliment a guy when I see a Ford in a Ford..... And I shout out when I see a Ford in a Chevy.... I’m quiet most of the time! Lol





    Bones
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2019
  18. buffaloracer
    Joined: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 822

    buffaloracer
    Member
    from kansas

    I think in your truck I'd rather have something out of the fe family. I think that 300hp out of your 302 is doable but any more than that is questionable to me in truck isn't going to be easy to live with.
    Just my $.02.
    Pete
     
    Boneyard51 and Jacob1963 like this.
  19. RmK57
    Joined: Dec 31, 2008
    Posts: 2,983

    RmK57
    Member

    If it was me doing the rebuild for basically the same money you could buy a 347 stroker kit. A half decent set of heads, solid flat tappet cam, intake, headers would get you into 400 hp easily.
     
    loudbang, JeffB2 and Boneyard51 like this.
  20. BigChief
    Joined: Jan 14, 2003
    Posts: 2,084

    BigChief
    Member

    Buffalo racer is right. 300 is easy on a budget. 350 400 is easy too but you're looking at new aluminum or at least ported GT40 heads and a bigger budget for roller cam and better components...stroker kits are getting cheaper every day. The Weiand Stealth intake is the best all around carbed street intake for the 289/302....again, this is OT and we're just asking for a bitch slap....deserving too. But WAIT...change your post to a 289 engine and you'll be on topic LOL! A SBF is fine for a light truck as long as your not using it for heavy hauling.
    I'd be cooler to do a Yblock. I have both. Everything has its place

    Sent from my SM-G950U using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    JeffB2 and Boneyard51 like this.
  21. King ford
    Joined: Mar 18, 2013
    Posts: 1,477

    King ford
    Member
    from 08302

    No way can anybody with any sense complain about 302 FORD questions with all of the 350 chevy stuff on here....cheapest way to make power is compression right?...I understand this ethanol blend shit will take a bunch of compression and not predetonate....
     
    Boneyard51 likes this.
  22. s55mercury66
    Joined: Jul 6, 2009
    Posts: 4,367

    s55mercury66
    Member
    from SW Wyoming

    Just me, but I would save my dollars for the 347 rotating assembly, use the Performer with a 600 cfm carb and some GT40 heads. It won't be a Top Fueler, but it should pull your F100 around nicely, with 3.50 to 3.70 gears and a shift kit in the C4. Call the cam manufacturer of your choice for a cam recommendation.
     
    Trefl, BigChief and Boneyard51 like this.
  23. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,370

    sunbeam
    Member

    Boneyard51 likes this.
  24. In your truck, a 302 will be a bit small. 300-325 HP is doable, over that you're getting more than a bit 'racy' and along with the C4 it won't have a lot of low-end torque. And rather than spending money on a stroker, I'd be far more inclined to just get a 351W instead. Pretty easy to hit 400 HP while keeping it 'cruise friendly'.
     
    Trefl, Gammz, osage orange and 2 others like this.
  25. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 3,661

    oldiron 440
    Member

    You have a 289 with an early 3" stroker kit. The best money you can spend on a sbf is on heads, I would NOT spend a dime on the stock heads. There is 70 to 125 hp to be had over stock heads depending on the head and cam combination. I personally like the RHS heads I've made good power with them..
     
    Boneyard51 and RMR&C like this.
  26. I’m a diehard Chevy guy, but the 302 Ford is one of their best engines! I guess it boils down to what your budget is. If it were me, I’d build a stock bottom end, with maybe a set of 5.0 forged pistons, GT40 Heads, match your can RPM range to your cruise RPM and let the HP numbers fall where they will. I tend to favor engines built for torque over HP. Besides, when you start putting HP numbers on stuff, that’s when things get expensive. Personally, I also favor flat tappet hydraulic cams. Keeps thing more “in budget”.


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    Boneyard51 likes this.
  27. 6sally6
    Joined: Feb 16, 2014
    Posts: 2,802

    6sally6
    Member

    A lotta truth in some of the posts ^^^^^especially
    (A lotta BS too!)
    302 CAN make the number you want but.....it will be getting pretty "high-strung" and then you will need a typical truck gear(3.73:1-4.10:1) to use it in such a heavy vehicle.
    AFR heads and a 331 or 347 stroker kit with a decent camshaft will get you to 350 HP pretty easy but....for ease of break-in and long term durability...you need a roller cam. You can "convert" your 50 year old flat tappet to roller but....they may entail a reduced base circle cam and the roller "kits" are pricey.
    If you have unlimited funds its....no big deal but....you would be dollars ahead to find a later model 351 with a factory roller cam and start there. It will bolt up to the C-4 but.....big HP thru a C-4 is gonna need to be in great shape or be beefed-up.
    4L-60"type" tranny with OD will give you the best of both worlds. Why have a "tricked-out/souped-up/eye-candy" pick'em-up truck if you can't show it off at all the local shows?!
    6sally6
     
    Trefl, Gammz, Deuces and 1 other person like this.
  28. deathrowdave
    Joined: May 27, 2014
    Posts: 4,443

    deathrowdave
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from NKy

    Man is that really called for ? I’m on the newbie’s side here . I’ll offer help anyway I can . If your post gets banned , PM me , again I’ll help you anyway I can . Damn it man , none of us know everything and has not ask for help , if you can stand up and say you haven’t ask for help , I’ll kiss your entire Sailor Azz and give you 20 minutes to draw a crowd to watch ! Sorry, to rant but damn he is just askin for some help .
     
  29. GordonC
    Joined: Mar 6, 2006
    Posts: 3,395

    GordonC
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I am surprised that the Ford engines from 63 and on get no respect when the Chevys from 67 and on do. Don't get it? I am going to do a 66 289 bored out, with a cam, set of alum heads, and a good intake, and a set of headers. Its going in a 1954 Metropolitan Convertible and I really don't give a shit if folks have a problem with that. Sheesh. The guy is just asking for help. Why not just help him?
     
    Deuces and Boneyard51 like this.
  30. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,632

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    You will be hard pressed to get that amount of horsepower out of a '68 302 (first year) which may not be a 302 Ford used up some 289 parts in the newer 302 blocks old Henry was a frugal guy back then. You can learn a ton checking out this site www.sbftech.com The biggest drawback with a 302 build is the heads they just do not make power but check out this info on heads http://www.mre-books.com/interchange/index.html Since you are swapping into a truck the extra cubes and torque of a 351 would be a nice upgrade.
     
    Boneyard51 likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.