Register now to get rid of these ads!

History Two T’s, Standing Tall

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by J.Ukrop, Mar 15, 2019.

  1. J.Ukrop
    Joined: Nov 10, 2008
    Posts: 3,668

    J.Ukrop
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    J.Ukrop submitted a new blog post:

    Two T’s, Standing Tall

    Continue reading the Original Blog Post
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2019
    Ron Funkhouser likes this.
  2. 56sedandelivery
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 6,694

    56sedandelivery
    Member Emeritus

    Well, the guy with the Coupe could have used a "cinder block" I guess, but channel iron is almost as far fetched. I think that just looking at these two cars however, we start to see just WHY, there are so many rules today.
    I am Butch/56sedandelivery.
     
    brad2v and 31hotrodguy like this.
  3. Chili Phil
    Joined: Jan 15, 2004
    Posts: 7,597

    Chili Phil
    Member

    Whoa, those are ugly. Hard to believe they were compe***ive.
     
  4. 41rodderz
    Joined: Sep 27, 2010
    Posts: 6,540

    41rodderz
    Member
    from Oregon

    Never thought rat rod suspensions would be a step or two or three above a race car but....
     
    31hotrodguy likes this.
  5. silent rick
    Joined: Nov 7, 2002
    Posts: 5,691

    silent rick
    Member

    definitely won't find either of them in ryan's examples of what traditional is
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  6. Dean Lowe
    Joined: May 20, 2008
    Posts: 22,042

    Dean Lowe
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That roadster in street roadster cl*** is a joke. Where are the front brakes? Where is the full exhaust system? I'm sure there is no charging system or even wiring for the "headlights". That kind of **** ruined the street roadster cl***es for real street roadsters. :(
     
  7. Chili Phil
    Joined: Jan 15, 2004
    Posts: 7,597

    Chili Phil
    Member

    Dean, the saddest part is that there is a whole generation of people who think that kind of crude **** is how it was done. Or, worse, that they think that **** is cool.
     
    J.Ukrop, Dean Lowe and 31hotrodguy like this.
  8. wbrw32
    Joined: Oct 27, 2007
    Posts: 7,314

    wbrw32
    Member

    I agree 1000%,,this late bunch of "wanna be"are just plain DUMB ***ES...just read a few threads here on the HAMB of late...many are finding us via Google,,shame,shame..note to Ryan and crew.Make it more difficult for Dumb ***es to gain membership on the HAMB..
     
  9. Dean Lowe
    Joined: May 20, 2008
    Posts: 22,042

    Dean Lowe
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    ^^ Amen brother ^^
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  10. Bluedot
    Joined: Oct 26, 2011
    Posts: 333

    Bluedot
    Member

    How are we gonna teach 'em right if we don't let them into the school of old school, as taught by Professor Ryan and staff?
     
  11. bschwoeble
    Joined: Oct 20, 2008
    Posts: 1,125

    bschwoeble
    Member

    Seriously. A lot of you people could not have been involved with drag racing in the early days. Yes, a lot of those cars were unsafe. They didn't have plastic money or a father that was connected. They did what they could with what they had.
     
    mountainman2 and J.Ukrop like this.
  12. Iron Man
    Joined: Feb 15, 2007
    Posts: 44

    Iron Man
    Member

    The roadster looks like Floyd Craig's Chevy Tee Fine out of Kansas City. He raced it a lot of years and it was fast....
     
  13. A Boner
    Joined: Dec 25, 2004
    Posts: 8,162

    A Boner
    Member

    Limited funds, equipment, not much technology, and skills. Big balls. Things have progressed every year since then, including safety rules.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.