Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Flathead torque rods

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Pappys31, Jan 3, 2021.

  1. Pappys31
    Joined: Jan 30, 2020
    Posts: 12

    Pappys31

    Hi ,
    I am working on the plan to rebuild the Model A I inherited from my dad and the flathead engine has two "torque rods" as my dad called them mounted from the back of the engine to the body. You can see one in the picture. He converted the drive line from the original torque tube to open several years ago so I am thinking these rods are no longer needed since the engine/trans are now installed like most newer cars. Am I correct?
    Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks
    Mark 20200902_083837.jpeg

    Sent from my SM-G960U using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  2. sfowler
    Joined: Sep 14, 2011
    Posts: 79

    sfowler
    Member

    i believe that you are correct .with out the factory torque tube , the rear axle can,t apply fore and aft forces to the transmission . they shouldn,t cause any adverse affect to leave them in .
     
    LOU WELLS likes this.
  3. Pappys31
    Joined: Jan 30, 2020
    Posts: 12

    Pappys31

    Thanks! That's what I thought too.
     
  4. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,684

    alchemy
    Member

    I think that they are useful since the rotating clutch throwout shaft puts force on the engine ***embly still. They aren’t hurting anything.

    My dad’s current project has a flatty and a T-5 and we are installing chatter rods.
     
    thunderbirdesq and stillrunners like this.
  5. sdroadster
    Joined: Jul 27, 2006
    Posts: 450

    sdroadster
    Member

    Anti chatter rods....
     
  6. On Fords with the X-member frame, they attached to the X member with a weird bolt that has a 1/2" square recess head. The ones on your car are not original Ford rods--they look like all-thread from the hardware store. As others have said, they're not hurting anything but, with open driveline, they're not doing anything either.
     
    stillrunners likes this.
  7. stillrunners
    Joined: Aug 27, 2009
    Posts: 10,588

    stillrunners
    Member
    from dallas

    Wonder if I should have them/keep them on either my 39 or 40 ? The 39 should be a 8ba to a TOD 4sp over drive to a 8" Ford rear. My 40 will be basically stock with the exception of a 8ba to the stock 3sp trannie - still closed driveshaft.
     
  8. rusty valley
    Joined: Oct 25, 2014
    Posts: 4,328

    rusty valley
    Member

    closed drive shaft should have them really, sometimes you can get bad clutch chatter, especially in reverse when the tires are trying to pull the drive train back and it affects the clutch adjustment enough to have "questionable" engagement resulting in chatter. lots of post about putting them on 8ba motors that have no mount for them.
     
  9. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 7,044

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    They came on '32 Fords and others with originally with closed drive lines...I would continue to use them if possible, if you remove them, don't throw them away:D If your front motor mounts and the rear mount on your T5 are rubber, I am sure you will need them.
     
    rusty valley likes this.
  10. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,797

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    My '40 has an 8ba with stock trans and I run the stock anti chatter rods. I have broke more than one trans in my '39 coupe years ago because I forgot the rods. Usually in reverse. Put 'em in!

    Dave
     
    stillrunners likes this.
  11. Olskool13
    Joined: Feb 12, 2013
    Posts: 16

    Olskool13
    Member
    from Queens NY

  12. Kiwi 4d
    Joined: Sep 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,885

    Kiwi 4d
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    They should mount to the crossmember somewhere near where the clutch spring is in a male female cup in the frame. All thread wont really cut it , it will stop the pull forward from clutch engagement , with rubber mounts you may be able to see the engine trans move forward with clutch engagement . Leave them in .
     
    big duece likes this.
  13. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 11,286

    BJR
    Member

    My 52 Willys CJ3A has an open driveline and has just one those rods on the drivers side. I believe it's for the clutch to keep from pushing the engine forward when pushing the clutch in.
     
  14. stillrunners
    Joined: Aug 27, 2009
    Posts: 10,588

    stillrunners
    Member
    from dallas

    Thanks all....lucky to have one stock complete 40 frame to look at.!
     
  15. Pappys31
    Joined: Jan 30, 2020
    Posts: 12

    Pappys31

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.