Register now to get rid of these ads!

1953 331 Hemi trans adapter

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Mark59, May 16, 2021.

  1. Mark59
    Joined: May 16, 2021
    Posts: 2

    Mark59
    Member
    from Norris TN

    Hi Everyone, New guy here! I am adapting a 1953 331 Hemi to a Mopar/GM A833 4 speed. It's the one GM used in the light trucks from about 81/85ish? I'm wondering if anyone has a drawing for that odd transmission bolt pattern.

    Thanks
    Mark
     
    chryslerfan55 and 31hotrodguy like this.
  2. COCONUTS
    Joined: May 5, 2015
    Posts: 1,238

    COCONUTS

    I have the same motor sitting in a 33 Plymouth sedan. With the extended bellhousing, with the Hot Head's adapter, I ended up going with a automatic because with a standard, the stick shift would be to far down the tunnel. I know this did not answer your question, but just an issue that I ran into to.
     
    chryslerfan55 and stillrunners like this.
  3. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,809

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have a '52 331 Hemi in my '33 Plymouth with a 40's LaSalle trans and a floor shift. It all cleared. Not by much grant you but it works fine. I think the 833 would work with shift bracket modified/moved forward.
    FWIW, I have a Mopar 833 O/D in my '68 Barracuda. I hate that ******! It is getting replaced with the regular 4 spd.

    Dave
     
  4. stillrunners
    Joined: Aug 27, 2009
    Posts: 10,592

    stillrunners
    Member
    from dallas

    But why the hate for the OD 833 ?
     
    chryslerfan55 and 31hotrodguy like this.
  5. I happen to like the 833 and have used them in more than one project. I currently have the Mopar one behind my 331 in my F-100. I have to ask why your going with the GM one over the Mopar unit. It's a direct bolt up to the 340/360 bellhousing. How are you compensating for the shorter input shaft of the GM unit? Or better yet, why?
    20171008_080605.jpg
     
  6. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,255

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    His '53 is a long bell, while yours (pictured) is a short bell.

    I have had both, and there is a big difference. As a matter of fact, until this thread came up, the only adapter I had been aware of for a long bell was to a '32-'48 Ford.
     
    31hotrodguy and Desoto291Hemi like this.
  7. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,046

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    chryslerfan55 and 31hotrodguy like this.
  8. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,997

    George
    Member

    Still have to have an adaptor for the short tail block.
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  9. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,997

    George
    Member

    long tail block: There's stick adaptors from HH and Wilcap, probably others. QEC (73RR) is supposed to be working on a long tail to C-4 adaptor.
     
  10.  
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  11. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,255

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    He didn't have to. He said his engine was a '53. While a very few early '54's had a long bell, I have never heard of a pre-'54 short bell.
     
  12. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,997

    George
    Member

    bingo! Guess piston broke isn't up on 331s
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  13. PotvinV8
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 552

    PotvinV8
    Member

    I've used the Hot Heads adapter behind a '53 331 mated to a T5 in a roadster pickup. Great setup and the OD 5th is very nice. Rebuilt the motor and will be using the same adapter mated to a Tremec TKO in another project ('40 Ford coupe). FWIW

    Without looking at the trans, I would think if you could get the register on the adapter to match the trans, it would be a fairly simple matter to transfer the mounting hole locations to the adapter and make things fit. Good luck!
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  14. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,255

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It's obvious that I had my last long bell a long time ago.

    It's good to see that there are adapters to decent transmission available these days. I sold a couple perfectly good long bells simply because of the lack of transmission choice back then.
     
  15. 31hotrodguy
    Joined: Oct 29, 2013
    Posts: 2,699

    31hotrodguy
    Member

    Hey Dave,
    I have plans for the same trans in a OT B body. What do you hate about it?
    Scott


    Sent from my iPhone using H.A.M.B.
     
  16. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,809

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Gear ratio spacing is terrible for "gettin' after it"! OK for just driving. Aluminum case models tend to wear out the shaft hole in the case. One also needs the O/D bell housing because of the huge front bearing retainer. I have not owned a GM version but I think they are different somehow, maybe bolt pattern?

    Dave
     
    31hotrodguy likes this.
  17. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,809

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The adapter to the LaSalle trans behind my '52 331 Hemi is an old one. They have been around for ever. I also have one that adapts to a flathead Ford ******, so as the '39. I ended up not using it and went with the LaSalle.

    Dave
     
  18. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,255

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Could you clarify something for me? Did you have two extended bell hemi adapters (one for a Cad/LaSalle and one for a '32-'48 flathead), or were you able to repurpose the flathead adapter to accommodate the Cad/LaSalle?

    I had a long bell to early Ford adapter once, and it looked like it could be adapted to a number of other transmissions by re-drilling and adding spacers. I never tried anything with it thought.
     
    Hnstray likes this.
  19. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,809

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yes, I have 2 adapters. 1 is on the '52 hemi with the LaSalle trans and is in my '33 Plymouth. The other one is for '51-'53 Chrysler 331 Hemi and adapts to '32-'48 Flathead Ford. The 1 for Ford insets the trans into the Chrysler extended bell and the LaSalle adapter is nearly flat but does extend back an inch or so.

    Dave
     
    Hnstray likes this.
  20. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,255

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  21. The GM ones use the same Mopar bolt pattern, but have GM input spline. I had one, an iron case, and the bellhousing from GM had both the Mopar, and the "Muncie" pattern on it. Just some more info. Yes the gear spacing is a compromise, as far as traditional 4 speeds, but the ratios mimic the 700R4 ones.
     
  22. 31hotrodguy
    Joined: Oct 29, 2013
    Posts: 2,699

    31hotrodguy
    Member

    Thank you for your input Dave. As for the GM version I put one in my 57 Chevy for a time and I had to turn the front bearing retainer down on a lathe to fit in the stock 57 bellhousing. In a post 57 Chevy car you can just run the truck bellhousing as long as the starter works out but for us tri5 owners the stock bellhousing is needed unless the car has been converted to later mounts. Hope that helps someone out there somewhere.

    Scott


    Sent from my iPhone using H.A.M.B.
     
  23. Mark59
    Joined: May 16, 2021
    Posts: 2

    Mark59
    Member
    from Norris TN

    Thank you all for the info, I hate to report life got in the way just a couple days after that post.
    I had to abruptly change jobs and my project went straight to the back burner. I'm back in the saddle now though and I appreciate everyones input and advice. I have since bought a hot heads adapter and a saginaw 4 speed. I do have a nice A833 for sale:D
     
    Max Gearhead likes this.
  24. slayer
    Joined: Jun 5, 2005
    Posts: 2,073

    slayer
    Member

    I had an old Speed Jems long bell 331 to Cad, LaSalle adapter that was a stand alone piece. I dont realy know if anyone else made anything like it back in the day.
     
  25. slayer
    Joined: Jun 5, 2005
    Posts: 2,073

    slayer
    Member

    That adapter may be what you were after from the start. The GM use 833 transmission had a different bolt patern from the Mopar version.
     
  26. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,059

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    General Motors actually used two different bolt patterns for these transmissions. One is the standard 1955-up common Saginaw/Muncie/Borg Warner pattern, and the other is a one off Mopar on the driver side/GM on the p***enger side pattern.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.