Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Ford falcon engine swap

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by 63futurafalcon, Aug 7, 2021.

  1. 63futurafalcon
    Joined: Aug 3, 2021
    Posts: 10

    63futurafalcon

    Hey I was just wondering how anyone would go about swapping a small block Chevy into a first gen falcon I’m sure it can be done I’m just mot sure if the subframe width is right or anything like that
     
  2. deathrowdave
    Joined: May 27, 2014
    Posts: 5,067

    deathrowdave
    Member
    from NKy

    It will fit right in the hole perfectly . Just don’t ruin the Falcon by making it wear a Bow Tie , Ole Henry made plenty of good engines to fill the hole with .
     
    Fingers, Texas57, warbird1 and 7 others like this.
  3. Fisher400
    Joined: Jan 27, 2020
    Posts: 181

    Fisher400

    Should we ***ume this is a 6cyl falcon with all 6cyl running gear? Not a 1st gen sprint with a v8?
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  4. Cut the shock towers back. Alter the steering shaft angle a bit. Make your own engine/trans mounts. Use stock exhaust manifolds. We dropped a BBC in a 61-ish Falcon Ranchero years back with no real problems. Took a short weekend. SBC should be easier. Making the rest of the car hold up to the BBC took a bit longer.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  5. The SBC isn't an 'easy' swap unless you're willing to make some major structural mods to the Falcon bodyshell. The narrowest engine compartment of the Falcon/Mustang/Fairlane type shell (about 1.5" narrower than the Mustang), only the 289/302 will fit easily. The SBC is wider than those (about the same width as a 351W) so you'll have to hack the shock towers and come up with a front-sump oil pan for the Chevy unless you're planning on replacing the entire front suspension.

    The other thing of note is the first-gen Falcon (and Mustang) had two distinct bodyshells. The six cylinder shell is considerably lighter-duty compared to the '63-65 V8 shells. When Ford added the V8 in '63, they tripled the metal thickness in the frame rails, underbody braces, and inner and outer rockers. Plus thicker metal and additional bracing at the shock towers and torque boxes tying the frame rails and rockers together. The only six-powered Falcon that got the heavier shell was the convertible, and it got even more additional bracing. You should add subframe connectors to the base six shell at a bare minimum if any 'spirited' driving is anticipated.
     
    Texas57, Thor1, JeffB2 and 10 others like this.
  6. Joe Travers
    Joined: Mar 21, 2021
    Posts: 709

    Joe Travers
    Member
    from Louisiana

    Drop a 5.0 roller in it. Makes plenty of horsepower to make the early bird fly and cheap to upgrade.

    Joe
     
    Thor1, JeffB2, -Brent- and 2 others like this.
  7. R A Wrench
    Joined: Feb 4, 2007
    Posts: 518

    R A Wrench
    Member
    from Denver, Co

    Many years ago I dropped a 289 & 4 speed into my 61 Ranchero, also swapped in a 63 futura front suspension for the 5 bolt brakes and heavier steering. Not a hard swap. Recently sold that ride to a friend & he is having a bunch of fun with it. I have even seen a 460 Ford in a 63 but it was tight.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  8. ahshoe
    Joined: Sep 12, 2012
    Posts: 1,057

    ahshoe
    Member

    Probably only because he has a Chevy motor laying around, otherwise why would you even consider it. You can get all the HP you need for that small car with a SBF let alone if you stroke it to 347 ci. A 5.0 roller would be a great choice.
     
    Texas57, warbird1, JeffB2 and 3 others like this.
  9. King ford
    Joined: Mar 18, 2013
    Posts: 1,477

    King ford
    Member
    from 08302

    Rodent infestation
     
    Texas57, 36cab, Carlmac 369 and 2 others like this.
  10. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,559

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    There is no shortage of people who are perfectly willing to overlook this, and press on with a swap anyways.

    My first generation Falcon is still a 6-cylinder, although now over double in horsepower. I added bracing and subframe connectors just for that.

    Having cut into the original structure to tie everything in, I can say of those without added structure, you are on borrowed time.
     
    VANDENPLAS, loudbang and Crazy Steve like this.
  11. 6sally6
    Joined: Feb 16, 2014
    Posts: 2,936

    6sally6
    Member

    5.93 Henry Ford.jpg

    Seriously though........unless it's a 63 or later 'Fal-****' there is a bunch of reinforcement needed to make it some-what-safe and driveable for any length of time.
    Maybe a custom tube ch***is with the 'Foul-****' body set on it would be a better approach.
    BITD I had a 64 Sprint(so I get to make silly remarks about the name!!). It had a bunch of stiffening and re-designing from FoMoCo to make it work. (It was a BLAST to drive too!)
    6sally6
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2021
    JeffB2 likes this.
  12. It has to be a V8 shell to get the additional structural upgrades. This remained true even beyond the '65 models, it's just that Ford upgraded the post-'65 six shells to where it wasn't quite as big a deal. The six bodies still didn't get the torque boxes, and there were still differences in the shock towers. Will you absolutely have issues if you swap a V8 into a six body? No, not necessarily but it will behoove you to monitor the upper a-arm attachment points and the frame rails for cracking as they have been known to do this. All the FE-equipped Fairlane/Torino/Mustang bodies had heavier shock towers for the weight/power compared to the lesser-engined models.

    The one variation is the Comet. While they shared the same two shells with the Falcon '60-63, in '64 Mercury upgraded all Comet models to the V8 shell regardless of power for better NVH.
     
    loudbang, VANDENPLAS and bchctybob like this.
  13. 63futurafalcon
    Joined: Aug 3, 2021
    Posts: 10

    63futurafalcon

    Ya that other guy was right i have a really nice small block laying around and it is a 6cyl so don’t pull that **** about Chevy in a Ford ok I’m 15 years old trying to build a cool car to drive around and I have a 350 and I don’t have to worry about the shock towers as I’m buying a straight axle so I can cut them out completely so ya does anyone know what motor mounts I would use?
     
  14. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

    Speedway?

    (Edit: you might want to change your profile, it says you are 55)
     
    VANDENPLAS likes this.
  15. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

    If you do this you will remove any structural integrity the front half of the car has. Take things away, you'll have to do something else to compensate. Those things are frail in front at best.
     
  16. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 6,102

    bchctybob
    Member

    ^^^^ Yep. The straight axle conversion will simplify installing the Chevy engine but removing the spring towers and diagonal support struts will weaken the front end a bunch. Weld doubler plates to the firewall and the top of the frame up front and add tubing supports like you see in the Chevy II front end kits. Close up the holes where the towers were using .062” steel (even better with beads rolled in) and weld them in. Speedway and others offer many Chevy conversion mounts but I would use a crossmember style and side mounts to add a little more strength back in.
    Drop that Chevy in there. Every Falcon has the easy SBF installation, be different (and FASTER!). Both of the coolest Falcons from my younger days were Chevy powered; 327 & 4spd in a ‘60 and a 427 & 4spd in a ‘64.
     
    loudbang and Budget36 like this.
  17. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,375

    Budget36
    Member

    So now that we know the OPs age and what he wants, maybe you folks that have done this kinda thing, can walk him through it, maybe you took pics, etc.

    To me (never having one) and I hear beef this up, cut this out, add this….I’m in no better shape than the young man is.
    Maybe you folks can link a proper article / thread showing/describing what needs to be done?
     
  18. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,039

    squirrel
    Member

    How good of a fabricator are you? I wasn't any good at it at age 15, but by age 17 I could make some motor mounts that would fail after a few months....now I'm 60, and I can build stuff like that with no problem.

    The guys who are telling you that you need to do some serious modification to the car are right. Do you understand all that they are saying, and have the knowledge, skills, and ability (including equipment, supplies, and a place to work) to do all that frame reinforcing?

    If not, you might want to set your sights a bit lower for your first project. I started out by swapping a big block in place of a straight six in an old truck. I did a lot of homework, and the swap only took one day, and was successful, although over the years I redid most parts of the swap, to improve them. I still have the truck over 40 years later.

    But to answer your question about where to get mounts, the best ones will be mounts that you design and build, and you need some experience to do that. Good luck...we'll help you figure it out.
     
  19. Good on ya for thinking out side the box snd wanting to build something cool .

    these cars are pretty flimsy . I almost bought a 64 or 65 mustang 6 for next to nothing that was mint ( should of bought it but I was dumb) anyways when I looked into what was involved in getting the car steering, stopping , and structurally sound with a v8 I walked away.


    There is lots you can do to the inline 6 to make it fun until you understand exactly what you want to do with this thing.


    Post some pics, they are cool cars .
     
  20. brianf31
    Joined: Aug 11, 2003
    Posts: 1,048

    brianf31
    Member

    If you get rid of the shock towers and add a heavier/stronger V8, you should consider an 8 point cage with outriggers tied in to rockers and subframe connectors. See the build in my signature for photos.
     
    Thor1 and loudbang like this.
  21. The guy he wants to talk to is @1971BB427 who stuffed a BBC with a straight axle into a early Falcon. IIRC he had a build thread on here if somebody can find it.

    @63futurafalcon, this isn't a novice project. There's much more to it than just hacking the shock towers out and rolling a straight axle under it. You WILL have to reinforce the body structure and you won't find any 'kit' parts for this, there will be fabbing involved. Hopefully you have available all the needed tools and somebody to mentor you through the tough parts. You'll need good lay-out and welding skills.

    My advice is to work up a budget; the axle set-up, better figure another steering box and steering linkage, motor and trans mounts, material costs for steel (not cheap these days!), custom headers, etc, etc. It almost never turns out as cheap as you think it will. You may find a good used 302 roller SBF which will bolt in with commonly available parts may be just as cheap and far easier.
     
  22. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,050

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'm not a Ford in a Ford nutcase by any stretch and one of my buddies had a hell of a time selling a pretty decent 40 Ford with a 351 in it when it probably would have sold for his original asking price if it had had a 350 in it.
    Still, If I was 15 and it was my first build I'd sell the 350 and put the money in one of those 302 roller motors aka 5.0 Mustang engines and be able to do the whole swap as a bolt in. Everything is readily available to do the swap either scrounged used or new and 95 % of the time if it fits in a 65/66 Mustang it will fit in the Falcon. No expensive oil pans or hunting that rare Chevy oil pan that now brings Big Ebay money, No cutting and reworking the shock towers to clear exhaust or so you can reach the spark plugs.
    That's the cool part with that car, Ford based the Mustang and several other cars on that basic 60 Falcon platform and parts swap including suspension and brake upgrades.
     
    Thor1, loudbang and VANDENPLAS like this.
  23. loveoftiki
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 9,178

    loveoftiki
    Member
    from Livonia,Mi

    What about hardtop Futuras? Made 6 and 8 models..
     
    loudbang likes this.
  24. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

    He already has the patient car.
     
  25. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,039

    squirrel
    Member

    they didn't make 4dr hardtops, and he has a 4 door
     
  26. captaintaytay
    Joined: May 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,205

    captaintaytay
    Member

    Flag on the play that's a 15 yard penalty, putting that Chevy in that poor little Falcon.
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2021
    ahshoe and loudbang like this.
  27. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,375

    Budget36
    Member

    Ford Barn is over there>>>>
    ;)
     
    Blues4U and Thor1 like this.
  28. 63futurafalcon
    Joined: Aug 3, 2021
    Posts: 10

    63futurafalcon

    I do understand the extent of the project and I have a friend of my grandfathers who will walk me through and help me he raced and built g***ers in the early sixties and ya I understand I need to reinforce it I was thinking about a tube running from the subframe rail to the firewall and subframe connectors as well and probably a six point roll cage and a stripped down interior and I will probably run fenderwell headers out of where the shock towers where and like I said earlier I have plenty of steel tubing to strengthen that front end
     
    Blues4U and bchctybob like this.
  29. 63futurafalcon
    Joined: Aug 3, 2021
    Posts: 10

    63futurafalcon

    Yes about the speedway and I can’t figure how to change the age it was an accident
     
  30. loveoftiki
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 9,178

    loveoftiki
    Member
    from Livonia,Mi

    No I was asking if these models had different unibody structures
     
    loudbang likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.