Register now to get rid of these ads!

History What era was this 32 chassis built?

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by MRoller, Nov 10, 2021.

  1. MRoller
    Joined: Apr 16, 2020
    Posts: 21

    MRoller
    Member
    from Montana

    Hey guys, I’m starting on my 32 3 window and trying to pick a direction to go. I really like early traditional builds with wishbones and bango rear ends etc, but since the car is already rolling I thought I should find out more about the way it is now. I believe it has a olds 9.3 rear end with triangulated four link. Up front it looks like a 32 axel, which has holes from a tow bar to probably get to the track, and 40s style round back spindles and Airheart disc breaks. So my question is does anyone recognize the other components like steering, hairpins and so on. Also what year do you think it was put together I was told 60s about I feel like it was later. I think I read Airheart brakes came out in 1963. But we’re they using allen headed bolts and tie rod ends like that in the early 60s? It also is setup for a 409 which seems like a lot for not being boxed rails. If it is actually a period correct 60s style drag car that is the direction I’ll go with it. But if is 70s and later I might change it up. Any info and input is appreciated thanks. FYI Front wheels are just rollers looking for a set to match the rear.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,735

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Looks like it was built in the early 70's, frame not boxed. HRP
     
    55willys likes this.
  3. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,845

    -Brent-
    Member

    I would have said late-90s to 2000s based on the rear set-up, how the brackets are fabbed, etc. There's so little there that you can go in any direction you want.

    I say ABSOLUTELY go in the direction you want, regardless.
     
    bchctybob, redoxide, sko_ford and 2 others like this.
  4. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,490

    Fordors
    Member

    Late ‘60’s- early ‘70’s, but I’d guess the steering damper and triangulated four link came later.
    My first ‘32 was a channeled Cabriolet, I bought it as a roller but it had been raced with a 409/425 and a T-10 4 spd
    in unboxed rails. Unboxed rails were pretty common back then.
     
    bchctybob, joel, SS327 and 3 others like this.
  5. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,977

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That rear end setup looks like a kit. At least the triangulated 4 link. The coil springs behind the axle scream mid 70's though.
    If memory serves right the Airharts were a hot lick item in the 70's and maybe early 80s before hot rod shops came out with setups using more common calipers.
     
  6. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,402

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Definitely before reproduction firewalls came on the scene!
     
    sko_ford and -Brent- like this.
  7. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 7,044

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    Is that a Hudson steering box??
     
  8. goldmountain
    Joined: Jun 12, 2016
    Posts: 4,853

    goldmountain

    The rear coil springs date it to before coilovers became popular. Airheart discs with '32 spindles look like an early setup too. The triangulated 4 bar was a GM idea in the mid sixties and this one is done with heim ends and not rubber bushings or urethane so I would say built in the late 60's.
     
    bchctybob and -Brent- like this.
  9. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,845

    -Brent-
    Member

    Well, look at us! Hahaha.

    I think we can all agree when the body was made! :D
     
  10. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

    I'm gonna say a lot of it says early 70's to me.
     
    55willys likes this.
  11. Hollywood-East
    Joined: Mar 13, 2008
    Posts: 2,146

    Hollywood-East
    Member

    A lot of mid 60's g***er's did the coil's, Wasn't that a Chuck Finder's thing..
    PS: That coupe is Killer btw
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2021
    bchctybob, AHotRod and -Brent- like this.
  12. SS327
    Joined: Sep 11, 2017
    Posts: 3,883

    SS327

    To me the front looks mid 60’s to very early 70’s. But the rear it looks like late 80’s mid 90’s looking at the brackets. That is just my opinion. Your mileage may vary. Objects in mirror may be closer than they appear. Etc.
     
    John Lee Williamson likes this.
  13. Torkwrench
    Joined: Jan 28, 2005
    Posts: 2,751

    Torkwrench
    Member

    The rear axel is not a 9.3 from a 1957 - 1964 Olds / Pontiac. It might be from a 1956 or older Olds / Pontiac. The 56 and older axel looks very similar to the 57 - 64 axel. However, the 56 and older is smaller.

    The tip off from your photo is the smaller pinion flange and the adjuster bolt that is protruding from the drop out center section.
     
    bchctybob likes this.
  14. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

    One problem with dating things is that many builders are can be as much as 10 years behind the curve and far as when certain things were fresh or hot. There were guys with their heads just getting up to speed with state-of-the-art 1969 in 1979. There are still guys building their version of Boyd circa 1985. Then there is the problem of drawn out build times and chasing hot at the time parts and methods as they evolve.
     
    bchctybob, rdscotty, redoxide and 2 others like this.
  15. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,977

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Good info on the brakes here History - When did airheart brakes come about? | The H.A.M.B. (jalopyjournal.com) placing them from the mid 60's though the early 70's. Any markes or casting numbers or names on them might narrow that down.

    Front end looks to be 60's period correct with mostly stock pieces including a the dropped axle that somehow looks more A than 32 and a set of bolt on shock brackets that have been around since guys started bolting on tube shocks.

    Best thing I can say is that outside of the hacked firewall that car is pretty well scab free. Meaning who ever was putting it together had done their homework.
     
    bchctybob likes this.
  16. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,680

    alchemy
    Member

    I'm going to guess that steering box is from a 50 Chevy pickup.

    I also think the ch***is was built in the later 60's or early 70's. Some stuff is nice and clean, but some stuff I would never do. The most glaring thing needing changed is the front mounts of the rear fourbar. Bolting or welding them to the edge flange of the frame like that is begging to tear the frame. That's the most unsupported place on the C cross section of the frame. My brother bought a 32 built in the same era, with similar construction of the hairpin mounts on the front. They were cracked almost completely off, with only an inch or so still holding them on. Just enough to let him get the car on a trailer.
     
  17. AHotRod
    Joined: Jul 27, 2001
    Posts: 12,338

    AHotRod
    Member

    I'd say mid-ish '60's era drag car .... perfect for me. I'd embrace it and make it a race inspired Hot Rod myself.
    I Love it !
    Share lots of BIG pictures with us !

    CEDD9F05-C53E-4523-97A7-1E46CEA9E4CC.jpeg
     
    bchctybob, dana barlow and -Brent- like this.
  18. Joe Troilo
    Joined: Oct 3, 2007
    Posts: 352

    Joe Troilo
    Member

    MRoller,
    For whats is worth the SWC built in the mid sixties had many allen head bolts holding suspension parts. It also had Hurst Airheart brake calibers, multiple holes in steering arm and vertical shock brackets like yours. This ch***is could be mid to late 60's with some upgrades as the cl***es changed and better parts became available in the 70's.
    BTW - cool ride
     
    bchctybob likes this.
  19. 41rodderz
    Joined: Sep 27, 2010
    Posts: 6,540

    41rodderz
    Member
    from Oregon

    Started in 1969 into 1970 but in the thinking stage mid ‘60’s .
     
  20. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,977

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It's not an AD box not even a modified one but I'm thinking that it is a very close relative. Meaning the same basic box but a way different way of mounting it.
     
  21. Flatheadjohn47
    Joined: Aug 18, 2012
    Posts: 1,396

    Flatheadjohn47
    Member
    from Lewes, DE

    I bought new Airheart disc brakes in the mid 70’s to put on my then 32–5 window. Never did get the brakes to work well—-probably didn’t have the proper size master cylinder to function properly. 467B0C43-394A-4E5C-B8EB-57039F959F5D.jpeg
     
    ProtoTypeDesignFlauz likes this.
  22. KKrod
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 1,458

    KKrod
    Member

    I am in for mid to late 60's.
     
    bchctybob likes this.
  23. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

    Hello OP, are you still here?
     
  24. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,989

    bchctybob
    Member

    I would guess mid to late sixties as well. The rear end looks like a ‘37-54 Olds and with vertical coil springs it’s typical for that time period. Not sure about the triangulated upper bars though, that’s innovative for the time. A lot of frames were only boxed at strategic places and some race cars weren’t boxed at all.
     
  25. 60's , put the fenders back on, replace the firewall, put running gear in it and go.
     
  26. MRoller
    Joined: Apr 16, 2020
    Posts: 21

    MRoller
    Member
    from Montana

    Hey guys thanks for all the great info. I’ll probably leave the front but redo a few things in the rear or at least put a tab on both sides of the rod ends. I have a stock 392 hemi I want to put in it. So I’ll probably just take it easy on it since it’s not boxed.
     
    elgringo71 likes this.
  27. MRoller
    Joined: Apr 16, 2020
    Posts: 21

    MRoller
    Member
    from Montana

    New to this. How do I post big pics like you did? Maybe I just didn’t see the option
     
  28. Torkwrench
    Joined: Jan 28, 2005
    Posts: 2,751

    Torkwrench
    Member

    The steering box looks like a 55 - 59 Chevy / GMC pickup.
     
  29. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,989

    bchctybob
    Member

    As long as you are redoing some things you might as well box the frame in a few strategic locations. Back then I boxed my ‘32 frame from the front crossmember to the steering box, about 8” at the transmission crossmember, where the front of my traction bars (parallel 4link) attached to the frame and some small plates at the rear crossmember. Just three crossmembers and no X. With a BBC and a four speed I never had any problems and it was my daily driver for most of its life.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.