Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects '47 Ford Build/ Hardtop ????

Discussion in 'Traditional Customs' started by msjhydro, Jun 18, 2017.

  1. msjhydro
    Joined: Apr 11, 2017
    Posts: 6

    msjhydro

    Got myself a 47 Ford and started chopping it! Also have boxed 90% of my frame because of the blown big block 396! But I'm looking at making my Tudor into a hardtop "before I start with the body work!" You guys have any ideas how to reinforce everything? Or is it necessary? Just half worried it will screw up the cab!
     

    Attached Files:

  2. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

  3. msjhydro
    Joined: Apr 11, 2017
    Posts: 6

    msjhydro

    My apologies! I guess I'm not a 100% on which part I messed up on! Maybe all!!
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2017
  4. The 39 guy
    Joined: Nov 5, 2010
    Posts: 3,779

    The 39 guy
    Member

    I don't know for sure what X38 is concerned about. Most likely the big block and blower part of your project. Send him a PM and ask him.
     
  5. msjhydro
    Joined: Apr 11, 2017
    Posts: 6

    msjhydro

    Will do! Thanks!
     
  6. I've seen multiple coupes hardtopped, but not sedans... I would think some bracing would be in order. Maybe a rollbar, tied to the roof and quarterpanels.
     
  7. Nice example! As Crazy Steve said, hardtopped sedans are fairly uncommon, but I caught this one at the Custom Car Revival. It's an earlier model, but I thought it worked..
    IMG_3972.jpg

    Dave
     
    msjhydro likes this.
  8. Guess the pic doesn't answer your question, but it appears as though it can be done without too much concern. A chopped roof may be more sturdy in hardtop form than one that's stock height?
    From the rear..
    IMG_3974.jpg

    Dave
     
  9. The 39 guy
    Joined: Nov 5, 2010
    Posts: 3,779

    The 39 guy
    Member

    I would think the main concern would be keeping the B pillar/door jamb stiff enough. Perhaps a u bend or upside down roll bar of some sort would stiffen up the B pillar. That's a cool looking 38/39 sedan.
     
  10. msjhydro
    Joined: Apr 11, 2017
    Posts: 6

    msjhydro

    Yeah hopefully in my case! I'll need to brace it close enough to the body so when it's upholstered you can't tell! I was thinking the b-pillar is gonna be the weakest link!
     
  11. LBCD
    Joined: Oct 28, 2009
    Posts: 1,059

    LBCD
    Member

    A good chop on this body style is pretty hard to pull off...choice of wheels and or wheel covers can make or brake it. Yes...the flow is nice on the car you posted but with the right color and wheels would be a huge improvement.
    I like the padded hard top therefore no need for the standard body/door b pillar but definitely alot of bracing.
    Sorry I didn't answer your question but just an idea...
    Here are 2 examples one flows better than the other. The way the deck lid sits is hard to flow without it looking like it is chopped.[​IMG][​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2017
  12. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 17,166

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Brace everything before you start cutting. Once the top is complete then work on the doors. They are long and heavy, you need to add bracing under the "C" pillar so when you shut the doors the long body does not flex and crack at the corner like a 56 Victoria. The door jam may need some bracing also, 57 Ford converts had that problem when closing the doors.... And yeah I'd do it....
     
    rodncustomdreams likes this.
  13. Barn Find
    Joined: Feb 2, 2013
    Posts: 2,312

    Barn Find
    Member
    from Missouri

    Looking at a '47 convertible could give you a clue how to reinforce some things.
     
    rodncustomdreams likes this.
  14. msjhydro
    Joined: Apr 11, 2017
    Posts: 6

    msjhydro

    Awesome! Will look into that! Appreciate all the input!
     
  15. rusty rocket
    Joined: Oct 30, 2011
    Posts: 5,266

    rusty rocket
    Member

    So are you building a traditional looking car? Because a blown 396 and the picture you posted of the 47 hardtop sedan is really street roddy.
     
    msjhydro likes this.
  16. msjhydro
    Joined: Apr 11, 2017
    Posts: 6

    msjhydro

    I guess u would say more of the street rod style! I'm starting to realize that this forum may not be a good fit for my build! I apologize for the mishap but sure do appreciate the input!


    Sent from my iPhone using H.A.M.B.
     
    rodncustomdreams likes this.
  17. chopolds
    Joined: Oct 22, 2001
    Posts: 6,328

    chopolds
    Member
    from howell, nj

    Early hardtops often had a convertible frame underneath. These usually had extra steel welded to the bottom of the frame, as well as a heavy X member, that sedans did not have. Some also had extra body mounts.
    The bodies also had extra reinforcements. I rebuilt a 56 Ford ragtop a few years ago, that was in real bad shape. To help stiffen up the body, even more than factory, I welded in a 2 x 2 ( 16 ga) square tubing inside the rocker panel, spot welding it to the inner rocker, and under the sill plate. It ran from the firewall, and connected to the rear wheel well. I also added 1 x 2 tubing across the floor, under the rear seat. More 1 x 2's up the door jamb ( welded to the 2 x 2), tied in with more tubing, back to the 2 x 2 close to the rear wheel opening. reinforced the front door jam, too.
    Before, the car could not be parked on uneven surfaces, as the doors wouldn't open/close. After, even when on a lift, the door gaps remained consistent. Lots of work, but it really helps.
     
    msjhydro and rodncustomdreams like this.
  18. hotrod-kustom
    Joined: Mar 18, 2008
    Posts: 57

    hotrod-kustom
    Member

    My 46 hard top
     

    Attached Files:

  19. GordonC
    Joined: Mar 6, 2006
    Posts: 3,476

    GordonC
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    A 47 Ford with a blown motor is now unacceptable on this forum? Someone tell Fat Jack. Come on guys he is just starting out how can you tell if it's going to be too street roddy? The guy is just looking for help.
     
  20. fatfendered
    Joined: Apr 11, 2010
    Posts: 303

    fatfendered
    Member

    The Hamb better recognize that folks/attendance are dropping off. It my be due to those p***ing away or just getting pissed off by the constant trad-Nazi's. There are so many "traditional" items on here that would have never been done back in the day according to my father and his friends. And... a lot of the time, those trad-Nazi's have not ever built anything or even attempted to, but feel it's their right to call out the police. These are also the guys who are the first to degrade a projects. Those guys are pushing good folks out here when they can offer a lot of good ideas that we can all benefit from. I personally do not enjoy the current atmosphere and find myself getting on the Hamb less and less.
     
  21. rusty rocket
    Joined: Oct 30, 2011
    Posts: 5,266

    rusty rocket
    Member

    Yeah in 2017. Look at the original post.
     
  22. rusty rocket
    Joined: Oct 30, 2011
    Posts: 5,266

    rusty rocket
    Member

    The H.A.M.B. has rules. For the most part very traditional but I do think it’s odd that t-5s are not looked down on. I consider myself a traditional builder the last car I built the only con section I made was a 68 mustang master cylinder. My current projects con-section will be a t-5.
     
    GordonC likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.