Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical V8 Dual Plane history ?

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Tom65, Jun 3, 2022.

  1. Tom65
    Joined: Jan 4, 2022
    Posts: 25

    Tom65

    What I think I know.
    Up until 1932 most V8's ran flat plane cranks, in 1932 Henry equipped the Model 18's with a cross plane crankshaft in his new V8.
    The 1932 and 1933 V8's used a single plane manifold with a single barrel carby.
    The 1934 V8 got a dual plane manifold and two barrel carb to separate the Induction to the equally spaced induction pulses of two 4 cylinders, I guess to increase power (for the low rpm range the flat head used) and make the engine smoother.

    Does anybody have more pre 1934 Dual Plane intake manifold info on this ?

    1924 Cadillac had a cross plane crank, Manifold ??
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2022
    gimpyshotrods and Deuces like this.
  2. Dave G in Gansevoort
    Joined: Mar 28, 2019
    Posts: 3,794

    Dave G in Gansevoort
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    My foggy brain remembers reading about the history of vehicle development in the early days. It seems that forging technology was crude by today's standards, which made creating a 360 degree crankshaft difficult if not impossible for the time. And castings had to be very overbuilt to survive which made the size unmanageable.

    Billet crankshafts were used in high end engines where cost was not a consideration. But inexpensive vehicles couldn't have a part of the engine that cost a large part of the total cost.

    Ford was always pushing technology and metallurgy was an area where they were probably second to none. As an example, chrome vanadium steel was used extensively in Model Ts and As.

    When the flathead v-8 came about it was a very innovative engine, combustion chamber notwithstanding. I believe that the crankshaft was cast steel, which allowed reductions in the overall m*** of it. And gave good strength for the part in the original design specifications. Later crankshafts were designed to be cast iron, but not gray cast iron. Instead it was cast nodular iron, which has a much better fatigue resistance due to the carbon being spheroidized. In gray cast iron the carbon looks like little tiny razor blades throughout the iron-carbon matrix, which acts like stress concentration notches.

    Nodular cast iron has the carbon throughout the iron-carbon matrix shaped like little tiny marbles, which cause much lower stress concentrations through the matrix.

    I know, no one asked for the diatribe. Sorry...
     
  3. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,248

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    No problem. I, for one, appreciated it.
     
    Outback, gimpyshotrods, Tom65 and 3 others like this.
  4. miker98038
    Joined: Jan 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,596

    miker98038
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Thank you. I learned something. At my age, you’ve got to keep learning things to keep up with what you’re forgetting. Now, if I can just remember it.
     
  5. Tom65
    Joined: Jan 4, 2022
    Posts: 25

    Tom65

    Cadillac had a cross plane crank by 1924 along with Peerless but the Caddy didn't get a Dual Plane until 1939 it seems.

    Cadillac 39 to 48 manifold.jpg

    I don't think Ardun ever did a Dual Plane manifold with their OHV conversion, that's a real pity.

    So far it looks like Ford was the first Dual Plane Manifold.
     
    VANDENPLAS and gimpyshotrods like this.
  6. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,396

    sunbeam
    Member

    The main reason v8 engines run 2 plane cranks is less vibration than flat cranks. Important to p***enger car. Performance wise flat cranks rev faster less crank weight. Flat crank vibration gets worse as cu. in. increase. The same things happen to 4 cylinders You don't see to many high rpm 200 + inch 4s
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2022
    Tom65 likes this.
  7. Tom65
    Joined: Jan 4, 2022
    Posts: 25

    Tom65

    Unless I can find an earlier patent it looks like I have to call Ford the inventor of the V8 Dual Plane manifold.
     
  8. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 10,750

    Rickybop
    Member

    This thread was posted Friday, but I noticed very few responses. Now I know why.
    The stuff of headaches LOL.

    I have to admit, you guys started losing me. Sounds like it's time to learn something.
    Flat plane vs crossplane crank?
    Ok... I think.
    And how it relates to the firing order and the advent of the dual-plane intake manifold.
    Interesting. I'm listening.
    And it sounds like I'm gonna have to do a little research.
     
    Outback likes this.
  9. Tom65
    Joined: Jan 4, 2022
    Posts: 25

    Tom65

    Same as crossover exhausts, to keep the pulses seperated by 180 degrees you need to swap side to side or run a flat plane crank.
    Flat plane crank was never an option for Henry because he needed the long stroke to get capacity in a short motor with low taxable horsepower.
     
  10. Tom65
    Joined: Jan 4, 2022
    Posts: 25

    Tom65

    Poms got a bit of advertising promo in '34.

    V8 34 Dual Plane.jpg

    US version got color.

    34 Ford V8 Dual.jpg V8 34 Dual Plane.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2022
    Outback and Rickybop like this.
  11. Tom65
    Joined: Jan 4, 2022
    Posts: 25

    Tom65

    Last edited: Jun 6, 2022
    Outback likes this.
  12. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,396

    sunbeam
    Member

    Really only 1 reason for a dual plane manifold on a v8 no matter what kind of firing order you come up with you will have2 cylinders next to each other that fire one right after each other. With out a flat crank.
     
    Tom65 and Outback like this.
  13. Tom65
    Joined: Jan 4, 2022
    Posts: 25

    Tom65

    180 degree separation dates back to a 1909 French patent.

    20220607_091755.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2022
    Outback likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.