Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 56 Dynaflow

Discussion in 'Traditional Customs' started by Joerg Fischer, Oct 18, 2022.

  1. Joerg Fischer
    Joined: Sep 29, 2021
    Posts: 11

    Joerg Fischer
    Member

    Hello,
    I have a 56 Buick with a 322 nailhead that I want to overtake now. If I want more power, my question is what my Dynaflow transmission can tolerate in terms of power. Can someone help me with that?
    Sorry, my English is not perfect
    Greetings, Joe
     
  2. stubbsrodandcustom
    Joined: Dec 28, 2010
    Posts: 2,664

    stubbsrodandcustom
    Member
    from Spring tx

    They dynaflow was a slushbox trans, even worse than a cast iron glide. It will take probably 3-400 before ****ping out, biggest issue is trying to keep it cool, the torque converter will build up more heat the higher HP you go. Find some way to cool it down and it may hold up, the SP400 in the 60s is a better upgrade or just do the 700r4 swap for better drivability and parts availability.
     
  3. How much horse power are you planning to make out of the nail head ?

    while not a great transmission , and generally prone to leaks . The Dyna flow is a fairly strong transmission behind a stock or slightly better nailhead .


    I agree a trans swap is a better option , but on a 50’s Buick that means removing the torque tube and some fabrication .

    I ***ume your in Europe . Look into Jaguar series 3 rear suspension setups a pretty easy way to get a mor conventional rear end in your car easily and then figure out transmission options .

    I got a Bundstens ( not sure if I spelled it correctly ) adapter when I had my 55 Buick as I was going to swap out the ****** then changed my mind .

    a really nice set up , not cheap but a great option .
     
    Truckdoctor Andy likes this.
  4. Joerg Fischer
    Joined: Sep 29, 2021
    Posts: 11

    Joerg Fischer
    Member

    I want 50-100 HP more. I think I cool my transmission first and taketime to find parts for the swap. Do I always have to change the rear axle if i swap the transmission or are there any other conversion parts?
     
  5. texasred
    Joined: Dec 3, 2008
    Posts: 1,221

    texasred
    Member
    from Houston

    if you own a yacht the dyna will make a great anchor
     
  6. williebill
    Joined: Mar 1, 2004
    Posts: 3,549

    williebill
    Member

    Some guys like them, a lot don't. I used to daily drive a 58 Super with a strong 364, and I hated the way it felt. You could feel the slopppiness whenever you stepped on it. RPM didn't seem to match forward speed, with a lot lost in the transmission. As a DD, that car stayed in the carport, cause I didn't have anymore garage space. I sold the car cause I didn't have a way or place to swap out everything behind the 364. Sweet car, ****ty transmission. YMMV.
     
  7. Baumi
    Joined: Jan 28, 2003
    Posts: 3,475

    Baumi
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Jörg, my friend Martin converted two 53s and a 56 Buick to open drive, using a TH350 on the 56 and a Th700 on the 53s. He used GM B-body rearends on the 53s and a 64 Electra rear on the 56 and built a 60s GM truck style trailing arm rear suspension for them . All three cars drive beautifully and even the 56 that is running a little 264 nailhead through a TH350 is kind of zippy and runs amazingly well for such a small engine. The 53s are running a 322 and a 401. Buick ST400 or SP 400 out of a 64-66 (7?) Buick would be a direct bolt on to your stock 322. I think a transmission swap would free more feelable power than hopping up your 322 and keeping the Dynaflow.
     
  8. Build the engine! Drive for awhile. I think you will be surprised in a good way. Then replace if you are not happy.

    Ben
     
  9. Joerg Fischer
    Joined: Sep 29, 2021
    Posts: 11

    Joerg Fischer
    Member

    I think I'll rebuild the engine first and then I'll see how it drives. Trank you Ben.
     
    firstinsteele likes this.
  10. Joerg Fischer
    Joined: Sep 29, 2021
    Posts: 11

    Joerg Fischer
    Member

    hello baumi. I see you don't live far from me. Can I contact you if I want to swap the gearbox for more detailed information Form YouTube fremd Matrin?
     
    Baumi likes this.
  11. Joerg Fischer
    Joined: Sep 29, 2021
    Posts: 11

    Joerg Fischer
    Member

    Yor friendMartin.
     
  12. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,252

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    The later transmissions are NOT a direct bolt on; the '53-'56 engines have a different pattern on the back of the block than the '57-'66 engines.
     
    Baumi likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.