Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Pontiac 316

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by moldyoldy, Jun 10, 2023.

  1. moldyoldy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2008
    Posts: 68

    moldyoldy
    Member

    Ran the numbers on a Pontiac engine I found, from my grandfather's gas station. I thought it was a 389, as my uncle had a '63 Bonneville he totaled out. Apparently, this one's a 316 stick, w/ heads from a 347... Any value to be had here? Any idea what the market for these things is? I know it was a one year only engine, but then, seems like everyone wants the 389 (or better).... Should I try to sell whole, or just yank some parts & s**** the rest? Thanks!
     
  2. NoRust
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 149

    NoRust
    Member

    Pontiac 316 V8 Engine

    The 316 V8 was a very important engine for Pontiac as it made its push for recognition in the horsepower wars. One version of the Pontiac 316 called the Strato-Streak gained a lot of notoriety due to the fact that it was the first engine ever from Pontiac to be equipped with dual quad carburetors. This engine helped Pontiac push further into the NASCAR world as well because of the impressive 285 horses that the 316 produced. Only around 200 of the Strato-Streak 316 engines were ever produced so if you ever find one then it would definitely be worth some money.
     
    SS327 likes this.
  3. The 316 was/is a good engine. I had one that was a hand-me-down (had to buy it, though) from my parents... ran it hard with no problems. In stock form it would beat (or match) a comparable stock 283 SBC. Although heavier than a SBC, I'd say it would have value to someone building a "traditional" hot rod. Do you have the transmission/bell housing/clutch with it? That would definitely add value. I'd try selling as-is and only part it out as a last resort. YOMV
    Hopefully some more knowledgeable than me can give you insight to the '57 heads.
     
  4. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,377

    Budget36
    Member

    Never knew of a 316 do remember the 326.
    Yes, useless information.
     
  5. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,260

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Lemme see if I remember my fifties Pontiacs V8's:rolleyes:

    1955 - 287
    1956 - 316
    1957 - 347
    1958 - 370
    1959 - 389

    How'd I do?

    Oh yeah, to answer a previous post, a 326 is just an emasculated 389.
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2023
    302GMC, '28phonebooth, SS327 and 3 others like this.
  6. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 17,170

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    My 56 GMC pickup had a 316 with a dual range Hydramatic.
    Chevrolet, Pontiac, Chrysler, Dodge, Cadillac, Packard, and Ford/Mercury offered dual quads whether offered on the ***embly line or the parts counter. Not sure on a Plymouths.
    Some were seen on drag strips, NASCAR, and law enforcement.
     
    sdluck and Budget36 like this.
  7. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,377

    Budget36
    Member

    You’ve confirmed you’re 10 years older than me;)
     
    '51 Norm, SS327 and tractorguy like this.
  8. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,260

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    81 next week.
     
    impala4speed, Budget36 and tractorguy like this.
  9. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,377

    Budget36
    Member

    Well my man, ya gonna have 20 on me, good for you and keep doing what you’re doing!
     
    SS327 likes this.
  10. wvenfield
    Joined: Nov 23, 2006
    Posts: 5,671

    wvenfield
    Member

    To me anything Pontiac is worth keeping.

    It's not an easy swap to put in anything other than a Pontiac in a V8 50's Pontiac and yes people would rather have the 389 but they aren't so easy to come by so someone needing an engine most certainly would be interested.

    You mentioned "stick". If it was a standard and you have the bellhousing and parts those aren't easy to come by. While one year they are all basically the same.
     
  11. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,260

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    When I was in High school in the late fifties, most of the Pontiacs you saw had Oldsmobiles with Hydramatics. I don't remember any with Pontiac engines and very few with the original drive train. I remember in particular a bronze '51 two door with an Olds with 6-twos, all with "frog's-mouth" scoops with the insides painted bright orange! Obviously, the guy didn't run a hood!:eek:
     
  12. You're spot on for the years/cubic inches, but dead wrong on the 326. I had a '63 Le Mans with the 326 (4 barrel) and three speed, and if I got it rolling before I nailed it....(week drivetrain) that little SOB was a bomb!! 389s were in heavier cars (except the GTO). Don't cut the 326 short!
     
  13. v8flat44
    Joined: Nov 13, 2017
    Posts: 1,211

    v8flat44

    I knew a guy in 1962 who bought a used 56 Pontiac with dual quads & a 4 speed ******. He said it was a former police car from somewhere in Ohio. Never saw it loose a drag race. It was a black & white 2 door sedan.
     
  14. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,260

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Since Pontiac (nor any GM automaker) never offered a 4 speed transmission to anyone (law enforcement included) in 1956, the entire deivetrain is in question.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
    SS327 and Mark Yac like this.
  15. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 17,170

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Engine power was out running the strength of the manual transmissions of that era. Cars were always heavy but got heavier.
     
  16. stuart in mn
    Joined: Nov 22, 2007
    Posts: 2,822

    stuart in mn
    Member

    A four speed was a special order option in Pontiacs beginning sometime during the 1960 model year, then became a regular option in 1961. They used a cast iron case Borg-Warner T-10 (I have one in the car in my avatar.)
     
    31 B'ville likes this.
  17. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,060

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    A '58-'60 bellhousing will allow the use of a G M. four speed behind a '56 engine. Things changed in '61.
     
  18. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,260

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    My point exactly. Swaping an entire later engine/transmission would probably been cheaper and easer than keeping the 317 and adding a 4 speed. I wouldn't mind having a Chieftan 2 door post with a 455/Muncie.:D
     
  19. stuart in mn
    Joined: Nov 22, 2007
    Posts: 2,822

    stuart in mn
    Member

    You would have to deal with some fabrication to accept the different motor mounts on a later engine (early Pontiacs had a four point system, with one mount under the front timing cover, two at the bell housing and one at the transmission) but it would be a lot easier to find and would provide more performance.

    Back to the topic - I'd try to sell the engine complete at first, since it's set up for manual transmission that adds some desirability, both for early Pontiac owners or for hot rodder looking for something different.
     
  20. Crusty Chevy
    Joined: Aug 28, 2007
    Posts: 1,334

    Crusty Chevy
    Member

    We have one in our 56 wagon. My wife wanted to keep it original and rebuilt it. Parts were not a problem, we needed .060 pistons and opted for a mild hydraulic roller cam. You can get roller rockers to fit using adapters but we went stock. Ours has the Hydro. The stick was common on ambulances and he****s of that era for GM and Pontiac did make "professional cars" in '56. They came in 2, 4 and 2x4 barrel set up with 200-220hp. Only hick-ups for swapping one into another car is that it has a single front engine mount and a left side starter that will foul with some steering boxes. Hurst made a front mount that allows it to bolt into 35-40 ford frames. Only seen one in 10 years of looking pop up on eBay, sold BIN while I was still asleep. They are not complex and could be made.
     
  21. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,060

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    Was that mount a year or two ago? Could have been me.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.