Register now to get rid of these ads!

History SUPER STOCK A/FX & Match race photos

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by loudbang, Mar 22, 2018.

  1. Kentuckian
    Joined: Nov 26, 2008
    Posts: 865

    Kentuckian
    Member

    1963 Ford 427 Lightweight Bridenthal Ford launching.
    63 Ford 427 lwt Bridenthal launch 1.jpg
     
  2. FunnyCar65
    Joined: Mar 11, 2007
    Posts: 2,094

    FunnyCar65
    Member
    from Colorado

    It's clearly a sedan 2023_06_24_04.36.15.jpg
     
  3. Was this the first attempt at a 427 in a small Ford body by a factory Team? Gene.
     
  4. loudbang
    Joined: Jul 23, 2013
    Posts: 40,324

    loudbang
    Member

    An earlier version started with a 406.
     
  5. This is a thread run by IDIOTS - I post a 1965 Mustang that is clearly a FACTORY A/FX car and it gets deleted. Yet there are many mid and large bodied cars that are running in other classes.
    No wonder HAMB and associated sites are banned by the Vintage Ford Forum. I'm gone
     
    RmK57 and Troublemaker427 like this.
  6. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 33,579

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    That Hamb has a strict no mustang rule regardless of what year it is
     
  7. 427 sleeper
    Joined: Mar 8, 2017
    Posts: 3,171

    427 sleeper
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    tapatalk_1575945085617.jpeg
     
  8. glrbird
    Joined: Dec 20, 2010
    Posts: 601

    glrbird
    Member

    Here are a couple of local early AFX cars. My Dad was Shop Forman at the Pontiac Dealership. hemphill ford.jpg superior pontiac.jpg
     
  9. mohr hp
    Joined: Nov 18, 2009
    Posts: 1,133

    mohr hp
    Member
    from Georgia

    Mark, you must have some thick skin. I know at times I have bumped up against the limits of the HAMB, but I always try to respect what we have here. Thanks for keeping us straight.
     
  10. Anderson
    Joined: Jan 27, 2003
    Posts: 7,438

    Anderson
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Someone was selling an awful lot of Arnie Beswick photographs recently and I picked up a few. Here’s the altered LeMans going up against the Turbine Dart
    IMG_7105.jpeg
     
  11. Anderson
    Joined: Jan 27, 2003
    Posts: 7,438

    Anderson
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I looked through this thread to make sure there were other GTO’s and found some, and a Chevelle (and multiple mustangs…..) before posting this one. But am doing it in a second post in case you want to delete it. The Mystery Tornado against a bantam fuel altered.
    IMG_7104.jpeg
     
  12. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 33,579

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    65 gto and chevelles are fine , it is only mustangs that are off topic per the rules.
     
    Zettle Bros. and kabinenroller like this.
  13. Anderson
    Joined: Jan 27, 2003
    Posts: 7,438

    Anderson
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Here’s another photo of the Beswick car, but it came from a different collection. And one of the Rick Shaw
    IMG_7106.jpeg IMG_7107.jpeg
     
  14. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 33,579

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    I went thru the first 25 pages and deleted the Mustangs. I will do the rest later, I can think of many things I would rather spend my time on..... NO MUSTANGS MEANS NO MUSTANGS
     
  15. Never happened ..
    Belongs in MP thread
     
  16. About half this thread in bogus and needs to go away..Thanks for the effort though.
     
    Moriarity likes this.
  17. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 33,579

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    I went through and deleted the rest of the mustang pics.. also some 66-7 novas and Chevelles. Also some modern wheels. I don’t care what the history is, if the picture violates the fundamental rules of the Hamb please do not post them here
     
    bschwoeble and Just Gary like this.
  18. flatheadgary
    Joined: Jul 17, 2007
    Posts: 1,035

    flatheadgary
    Member
    from boron,ca

    i don't understand why people can't seem to get the rules. is it just to feel like their a part of the thread or what?
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2023
  19. SR100
    Joined: Nov 26, 2013
    Posts: 1,182

    SR100
    Member

    There are a number of posters who think their OT crap "is too cool not to post". There are also a few volume posters who copy large numbers of pics from other sites and don't pay attention to and/or don't care about the OT pics in those batches.
    There have been a lot of good threads ruined or locked because of these clowns. [I'm not pointing the finger at any particular person. These are overall observations.] Are repeat offenders warned?
     
    bschwoeble likes this.
  20. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 33,579

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    All deleted content is sent with a notification of why it was deleted. I have sent PMs also to some of the habitual offenders. Sometimes it helps and sometimes not....
     
    bschwoeble and SR100 like this.
  21. Jimihawk
    Joined: Jun 2, 2022
    Posts: 10

    Jimihawk

  22. Jimihawk
    Joined: Jun 2, 2022
    Posts: 10

    Jimihawk

    That Comet would be a deal at 37,000 today.
     
  23. Jimihawk
    Joined: Jun 2, 2022
    Posts: 10

    Jimihawk

    Who won that round? Bill Waters ford or Chev.
     
    bschwoeble likes this.
  24. Kentuckian
    Joined: Nov 26, 2008
    Posts: 865

    Kentuckian
    Member

    Handicap start '64 Galaxie Hi-riser A/SA vs '64 Thunderbolt S/SA at Niagara Dragstrip.
    64 Galaxie vs 64 T-bolt.png
     
  25. Kentuckian
    Joined: Nov 26, 2008
    Posts: 865

    Kentuckian
    Member

    1962 Chevrolet 409-409 SS/S sponsored by Garrison Motor Sales of Murray, KY

    62 Chevy SS-S 409 Garrison Motor Sales.jpg
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.