Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods The ALTERED thread

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by loudbang, Mar 3, 2016.

  1. 40ragtopdown
    Joined: Jan 13, 2015
    Posts: 30,381

    40ragtopdown
    Member

  2. 40ragtopdown
    Joined: Jan 13, 2015
    Posts: 30,381

    40ragtopdown
    Member

  3. 40ragtopdown
    Joined: Jan 13, 2015
    Posts: 30,381

    40ragtopdown
    Member

  4. 40ragtopdown
    Joined: Jan 13, 2015
    Posts: 30,381

    40ragtopdown
    Member

  5. AmishMike
    Joined: Mar 27, 2014
    Posts: 1,138

    AmishMike
    Member

    Wonder what happened to those old bodies. Ship me the Lakeside Dairy car
     
    bchctybob, 40ragtopdown and mad mikey like this.
  6. 40ragtopdown
    Joined: Jan 13, 2015
    Posts: 30,381

    40ragtopdown
    Member

  7. noboD
    Joined: Jan 29, 2004
    Posts: 8,640

    noboD
    Member

    What difference would have been between an A or B altered?
     
  8. THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Joined: Jun 6, 2007
    Posts: 5,649

    THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Member
    from FRENCHTOWN

    The weight-to cubic inch difference. The B/A car needs to carry more weight for every cubic inch of displacement than an A/A.
    Weight breaks changed over the years and by sanctioning body.
     
    40ragtopdown and loudbang like this.
  9. noboD
    Joined: Jan 29, 2004
    Posts: 8,640

    noboD
    Member

    Thanks, so it was just cubic inches? Weight was brought in too.
     
  10. THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Joined: Jun 6, 2007
    Posts: 5,649

    THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Member
    from FRENCHTOWN

    Indeed this made for an interesting concept:
    Is it better to build a small displacement engine and put it in a light car or build a larger engine and find a heavier car to use???

    Let's say you have a mnimum rule of 6 pounds per cubic inch.
    Should you build a 300 ci engine and put it in a 1800 pound car(car and driver > [6 x 300 = 1800#]) or build a 400 ci engine and put it in a 2400# [6 x 400 = 2400#] car?

    There are advantages and disadvantages to either path.
    The smaller engine has less internal motoring friction - GOOD! but a lighter car still has to push through about the same amount of air and spin similar drivetrain pieces making aero and drivetrain friction losses somewhat equal regardless of engine size - BAD! A smaller engine will require less fuel and hence make it easier to keep up with fuel demand - GOOD! but will likely be harder to handle or less consistent due to less weight on the slicks - BAD!

    The larger engine will make more power - GOOD! but motoring friction losses are higher (due to things like increased piston speed / drag and more oil pan windage losses, etc.) BAD! A heavier car also has the advantage of more weight on the tires - GOOD! but will probably be prone to breaking stuff - BAD!

    Arguments for either option have gone on for decades and successful cars utilizing each concept exist, somewhat dictated by evolutionary advancements in things like tires, clutches, engine components etc.

    I think the evolutionary trends in many classes tended to favor the smaller engine / lighter car school of thought.
    This aspect of the sport I find to be extremely interesting. I used to pore over the rules and rule updates when the rule books came out. More fun than reading Shakespear in Lit class which I was supposed to be doing.
     
  11. noboD
    Joined: Jan 29, 2004
    Posts: 8,640

    noboD
    Member

    Thanks for the explanation. The other day I saw a bogus streetrod, SBC with a blower, in a Model A coupe. He had AA/A painted on it, which I would think is wrong. Probably should have been a gasser, no setback, etc. It made me start to think just what were the rules. I read them but that was almost 60 years ago. Thanks for your help.
     
  12. Sky Six
    Joined: Mar 15, 2018
    Posts: 12,242

    Sky Six
    Member
    from Arizona

  13. Sky Six
    Joined: Mar 15, 2018
    Posts: 12,242

    Sky Six
    Member
    from Arizona

  14. Sky Six
    Joined: Mar 15, 2018
    Posts: 12,242

    Sky Six
    Member
    from Arizona

  15. dearjose
    Joined: Nov 17, 2013
    Posts: 1,112

    dearjose
    Member

    Screenshot_20230813_160654_Instagram.jpg I dig the body setback on this one. Not sure how successful it was but nice setup.
     
  16. dearjose
    Joined: Nov 17, 2013
    Posts: 1,112

    dearjose
    Member

    Screenshot_20230813_160807_Instagram.jpg One of the lowest fiats I've seen.
     
  17. dearjose
    Joined: Nov 17, 2013
    Posts: 1,112

    dearjose
    Member

  18. Sky Six
    Joined: Mar 15, 2018
    Posts: 12,242

    Sky Six
    Member
    from Arizona

    It's Mike Sullivan's
     
  19. Sky Six
    Joined: Mar 15, 2018
    Posts: 12,242

    Sky Six
    Member
    from Arizona

  20. Sky Six
    Joined: Mar 15, 2018
    Posts: 12,242

    Sky Six
    Member
    from Arizona

  21. Stan Back
    Joined: Mar 9, 2007
    Posts: 2,435

    Stan Back
    Member
    from California

    Mackey & Kitchen.jpg "Altered" (and all the other categories') rules often changed from year to year -- and sanctioning body. Sometimes weight to cubic inches, older rules for just displacement, supercharged cars bumped up a class, and more.

    In 1961 (or was it 62?) we ran a C/(Altered 25% and assumed Gas) Roadster with just displacement rules at Fontana and Colton. I remember we wanted to run in the new WinterNationals, but they considered our car an A/Roadster. (Plus, they wanted an entry fee. We were "part of the show" at that time and didn't pay entry fees. Plus flat towing to Pomona would be a chore anyway.)

    And here's a fun story -- We became the first Gas Roadster to run in the eights (or was it the nines) at Fontana. We started from the south fence, almost to Valley Blvd. It's amazing how much E.T. is shortened by starting 100 to 150 feet back from the Starting Line. The speed was down as the motor had a front gas pump and had run a bunch of time pushing back there and running so long before making the run that it lost fuel pressure.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2023
  22. 40ragtopdown
    Joined: Jan 13, 2015
    Posts: 30,381

    40ragtopdown
    Member

  23. 40ragtopdown
    Joined: Jan 13, 2015
    Posts: 30,381

    40ragtopdown
    Member

  24. 40ragtopdown
    Joined: Jan 13, 2015
    Posts: 30,381

    40ragtopdown
    Member

  25. Sky Six
    Joined: Mar 15, 2018
    Posts: 12,242

    Sky Six
    Member
    from Arizona

  26. Mike VV
    Joined: Sep 28, 2010
    Posts: 3,192

    Mike VV
    Member
    from SoCal

    From above -
    And another said, yes, Mike Sullivan...and Steve Height (from San Bernardino CA.), before any...paint.
    One of the best looking Fiats on the drag strip, no matter how it was painted.


    [​IMG]

    Mike
     
  27. 40ragtopdown
    Joined: Jan 13, 2015
    Posts: 30,381

    40ragtopdown
    Member

  28. 40ragtopdown
    Joined: Jan 13, 2015
    Posts: 30,381

    40ragtopdown
    Member

  29. 40ragtopdown
    Joined: Jan 13, 2015
    Posts: 30,381

    40ragtopdown
    Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.