Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 1941 Ford dropped axle steering

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by AntiquatedIndustrial, Nov 30, 2023.

  1. Ok we have a car here and need some advice.
    1941 Ford
    4 inch dropped axle
    2 inch dropped spring
    Steering has interference from the wishbones.
    Any advice or pictures of solutions is greatly appreciated.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,914

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska

    You need some deep drop steering arms to get the tie rod and drag link under the wishbone. Also looking at the angle of your shackle with no load on the front end your spring appears to be to long and under load the shackles will probably point toward the outside when they should be pointing to the inside at a 45 degree angle.
     
    Algoma56 likes this.
  3. Oh boy, customer provided the parts. Here we go again! We have two sets of steering arms here both interfere. Dropped arms (tubular style) won't even bolt on due to hitting the axles drop.
     
  4. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,214

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    '41 has Panhard bar so shackle length can be less than 45°.
     
  5. This is a stock 41 never modified and it has no panhard bar, unsplit stock bone
     
  6. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,914

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska

    Panard or not, a 45 degree inward angle is still optimum for spring performance. I have the deep drop arms from Roadster Supply on my 40 with a 4 inch axle like yours and split bones, turns fine. Split or stock bones should work the same. My brake kit is a P&J's Power Stopper. Customer parts?
     
    X38 likes this.
  7. Ok, we were looking at pete and Jake's dropped arms, they look like they may work. The spring was a "customer sourced" part as in they said "yes that's the correct part"... The disc kit is cpp and seems to fit fine.
     
  8. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,548

    Fordors
    Member

    IMG_9918.jpeg

    I was going to suggest these but I see you beat me to it.
    You might need to trim the thickness where the bolts go but I think they are your best solution.
     
  9. Ok, that's great information already. We will definitely address the possible spring issue after
     
  10. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,914

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska

    I'm not sure P&J's still makes those arms. They were originally manufactured by Ch***is Engineering which sold to Heidt's. P&J's bought the straight axle parts Heidt's didn't want to deal with. They do look like a possible solution.
     
  11. Weedburner 40
    Joined: Jan 26, 2006
    Posts: 1,126

    Weedburner 40
    Member

    As Gary stated, the spring appears to be too long plus, with a reversed eye and long shackles, it will be super low, maybe too low to be drivable. With those long shackles, driving that without a panard bar will be exciting if not kind of dangerous. The bump steer will be amplified.
     
  12. chicken
    Joined: Aug 15, 2004
    Posts: 679

    chicken
    Member
    from Kansas

    '41s used a long spring that pointed the shackles outward. No panhard (but sure needed one!). Had a "sway bar" that was supposed to keep the axle located but wasn't really that great. Going back to the '40 setup or using '42-up panhard setup is best but a bit of work.
     
  13. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,914

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska

    I'm not a fat fendered guy but I never saw a stock front spring that pointed out at a 45 degree angle?????????
     
  14. Kevin Ardinger
    Joined: Aug 31, 2019
    Posts: 1,049

    Kevin Ardinger
    Member

    Those Heidt arms may work. Wouldn’t work in my case. You can heat them and bend them though.
     
  15. guthriesmith
    Joined: Aug 17, 2006
    Posts: 12,039

    guthriesmith
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I thought most folks bent the originals?
     
    RICH B likes this.
  16. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,914

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska

    I asked about the shackle angle over on the Ford barn and have had only one response and he said on the 41's he's worked the shackles pointed out. The panard was added in 42. Learn something every day.
     
    gary macdonald likes this.
  17. RICH B
    Joined: Feb 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,020

    RICH B
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Those ex CE now P&J (but not produced) were about the only arms that worked decently with that axle due to the tightness of the drop. Maybe try to hunt down a set.

    Most of the other deep drop arms wrap around the kingpin boss and won't clear the axle without grinding while the CE arms dropped under the boss.

    P4060001.JPG

    P4060002.JPG

    P4060004.JPG

    P4070005.JPG
     
    guthriesmith likes this.
  18. X38
    Joined: Feb 27, 2005
    Posts: 17,498

    X38
    Member

    And forged.:)
     
  19. flatout51
    Joined: Jul 26, 2006
    Posts: 1,310

    flatout51
    Member

    I have a 5 inch drop axle in my 48 tudor. Ran the deep drop arms from Pete and Jake's but had to grind them to clear the axle. You could try and find an original set of spindles and heat and bend the arms to clear. That's what I did on my 46 coupe with a 4 inch drop.
     
  20. flatout51
    Joined: Jul 26, 2006
    Posts: 1,310

    flatout51
    Member

    Never mind. Disk brake kit won't ket you use the stock arms.
     
    guthriesmith likes this.
  21. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,548

    Fordors
    Member

    It’s too bad that apparently the 1008D steering arms are not being produced by P&J’s, it appears there would be a market for them. Maybe the forging dies are damaged?
     
  22. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,914

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska

    Over on the Ford Barn a guy responded to my question with a picture of the front of his 41 and the shackles are pointing out slightly. He says the front is stock?
     
  23. wheeltramp brian
    Joined: Jun 11, 2010
    Posts: 3,368

    wheeltramp brian
    Member

    My 41 has a sway bar in front and panhard bar.shackles are out a little too
     
  24. RICH B
    Joined: Feb 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,020

    RICH B
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Saw that; but his spring is beyond flat with a negative arch to the ends.

    Looking at Ford's spring chart; I noted that both '40 & '41 front springs had a 1-1/2" longer loaded length that the '35-'39 springs. Guess that would change the shackle angle some; but I don't think enough to reverse it.
     
  25. FlatJan
    Joined: Dec 13, 2013
    Posts: 323

    FlatJan

    guthriesmith likes this.
  26. geoford41
    Joined: Jul 26, 2011
    Posts: 766

    geoford41
    Member
    from Delaware

    they offer dropped tie rod end through the "Roadster shop" you do have to shorten the connecting link but the tie rod ends are standard 11/16-18 threads
     
  27. woodiewagon46
    Joined: Mar 14, 2013
    Posts: 2,535

    woodiewagon46
    Member
    from New York

    When you put weight on the axle and splay the shackles further out as they show now, you will need a panhard bar. If you don't, that front end will be all over the road, especially when you hit a bump.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.