Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Cadillac 331-390 adapter kits

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 1oldtimer, Feb 3, 2024.

  1. I altered the ***le so I won't have to make another pointless post.
    I'm thinking about 2 different kits to put a Chevy manual trans behinds and early Cadillac. Wilcap has a full plate (aluminum) and use a Chevy flywheel with the Cadillac bolt pattern and Speed Gems has a kit that has a 1/2 plate (steel), it uses all stock Chevy parts (clutch and flywheel) with an aluminum adapter on the crank.

    Can anyone think of ones being better then the other?. Is it better to have a modified aluminum Chevy flywheel or a aluminum crank adapter........or does it just come down to cost of each kit?.

    Wilcap:
    https://wilcap.com/wilcapstore#!/CAD-350-MT/p/54397263/category=14420222

    Speed Gem:
    https://transmissionadapters.com/pr...65-390-to-chevy-manual?variant=32022997958774



    Last question:
    Anyone know off hand how long a 331-390 with the hydro auto is in total length. I would like to shove it into the back of the panel without having to take it apart at someones house.
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2024
  2. 302GMC
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 8,478

    302GMC
    Member
    from Idaho

    '56 Chev 1/2 ton panel ? It'll fit ....
     
  3. Good, thanks.
     
  4. vtwhead
    Joined: Oct 20, 2008
    Posts: 5,305

    vtwhead
    Member

  5. seabeecmc
    Joined: Jan 28, 2005
    Posts: 1,285

    seabeecmc
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    pcv2.jpg pcv4.jpg pcv6.jpg I used the Bendtsen's kit. (Speed Gems) it really ****ed. I modified the shape of the crude plate to match the early Chevrolet 3 bolt starter bell housing and Cadillac engine pcv6.jpg . That allowed me to dispose of the ugly *** starter they provided. By matching the driver side of their crude plate it provided a place to mount the Chevrolet clutch linkage. If I had it to do over I'd just purchase the adapter plate and crankshaft adapter. Ron
     
    1oldtimer and guthriesmith like this.
  6. Aren't Wil-Cap, and Speed Gems owned by the same people now ?
     
    51 mercules likes this.
  7. rod1
    Joined: Jan 18, 2009
    Posts: 1,512

    rod1
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    What year Cadillac? 54 cad is extended bellhousing, 55 is short
     
    warbird1 and winduptoy like this.
  8. The "flat back" later version.

    Looks like it now.


    Reason I ask is I found a Wilcap kit used and I was looking at the Speed gems kit but I was going to buy pieces (just adapter and crank spacer). Not sure what would be better to run or even IF it makes a difference (except for price). I'm planning on putting it in my '56 Chevy panel truck in the future and hooking it to the stock 3 spd.


    The older Wilcap kit uses a Mopar starter and what I ***ume would be a stock Chevy clutch setup (it doesn't say on their website).
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2024
    rod1 likes this.
  9. I have the larger truck bell or the smaller bell that's on the 261 now. Looks like the only reason to run the larger bell is for the 168 tooth flywheel and starter in the kit. I can run the 153 and stock start with mods like you did.
     
  10. 51 mercules
    Joined: Nov 29, 2008
    Posts: 4,418

    51 mercules
    Member

    Yes!
     
  11. Hollywood-East
    Joined: Mar 13, 2008
    Posts: 2,146

    Hollywood-East
    Member

    Wilcap say's Sold Out....
     
  12. flamedabone
    Joined: Aug 3, 2001
    Posts: 5,754

    flamedabone
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    This is the Speed Gems deal. Wonderful so far, but the car isn't running yet. This set up turns the back of the block into a small block Chevvie so you can run whatever you want for a manual trans and clutch. In the box is the stock style clutch and flywheel it came with.

    cad3410-14-9.jpg

    cad3410-14-10.jpg

    -Abone.
     
    Irish Mike, guthriesmith and rod1 like this.
  13. I sent a question to Speed Gem asking if I could buy the block adapter and crank adapter separate, so we'll see. I'm waiting on the older used Wilcap adapter picture from the seller. I do like @seabeecmc idea to use the stock 3 bolt Chevy starter.

    I guess it comes down to price and do I want to run a modified flywheel with a Chrysler starter or do I want to run a stock parts with a adapter crank hub. Doesn't sound like one kit is better then the other.
     
    Irish Mike likes this.
  14. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    My only question is whether or not you would ever need/want to replace the flywheel. Custom wheels are expensive, the crank adapter allows for using an oem wheel.
     
    rod1 and Irish Mike like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.