Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical GMC Truck Engines

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Speed Gems, Nov 2, 2022.

  1. Speed Gems
    Joined: Jul 17, 2012
    Posts: 6,931

    Speed Gems
    Member

    Check out this video I found about Big GMC truck engines. Thiers a few hot rods with these odd ball engines in them. Mods delete if O/T but I think most (if not all) were built before '66.
     
  2. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,050

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Low speed torque monsters. One of those sixes is heavy enough and two hooked together would be up in the 4 digit weight count.
    We were pulling GMC V 6 engines out in the 70's and replacing them with V8 engines because they were gas hogs and even then you had a challenge getting parts for them. That V12 got about 2/4 mpg on a good day but would haul a serous load for a gas engine.
     
  3. 1Nimrod
    Joined: Dec 11, 2018
    Posts: 713

    1Nimrod
    Member

    A friend of mine Ken C, in Wenatchee, Washington has two GMC V12's, one for part's and the other running in his Old 40's GMC Grain Truck cutt down into an OT build.
    With around a 16 speed Standard Trans, that's combined with the Two Speed Differential, and Big Duallys.
    The running GMC V12 (702 ci, If I remember correctly) original came from a Big Farm and used for an Irrigation Pump, from a southern state.
    It's one cool looking engine and sounds great with open short homemade Header's.

    Keep On Trucking Brother's...
     
    firstinsteele likes this.
  4. SS327
    Joined: Sep 11, 2017
    Posts: 3,951

    SS327

    702 cubic inches, V12, The Twin 6 it was called!
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  5. Would that be Waylon, the grafter? I would really like to visit his domain. Gorgeous view!

    Ben
     
    1Nimrod likes this.
  6. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,431

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    GMC also produced a 637 ci. V8 that was intended to be a more "economical" replacement for the 702 V12. Basically the 478 V6 with 2 more cylinders grafted on. It still had a 60 deg. V angle , which required a balance shaft to handle some of the odd vibrations. Came in both Gas and Diesel varieties. The gas unit was rated at 275 hp, and 560 ft-lbs of torque. Being that these engines were m***ively over-square (5.125" bore vs. 3.86" stroke), they would probably take well to some hot rodders tricks, ***uming you can keep it from shaking itself apart. The V8 weighed in at just over 1,200 lbs fully dressed, but that was still 300 lbs less than the V12.

    I have always wanted to take one of these large displacement g***ers from the 60's and early 70's (Ford 534, GMC 637, IH 549, etc), add a nice big turbo or 2, tune it to make peak torque right around 2000 rpms, and put it in a tow rig. Lots of boost, and let the turbos do the work. If done correctly, I think you could embarr*** the hell out of more than a few diesels pulling anything short of a house, and still get "respectable" mileage.

    [​IMG]
     
    1Nimrod and osut362 like this.
  7. In_The_Pink
    Joined: Jan 9, 2010
    Posts: 980

    In_The_Pink
    Member

  8. 1Nimrod
    Joined: Dec 11, 2018
    Posts: 713

    1Nimrod
    Member

    Yes it's Ken Coates from Wenatchee Washington, "The Grafter"...
    Ken has some cool stuff.

    Keep On Trucking Brother...
     
    firstinsteele likes this.
  9. Woogeroo
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 1,283

    Woogeroo
    Member
    from USA

    1Nimrod likes this.
  10. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,431

    FrozenMerc
    Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.