Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Early Hemi 354 - solid roller lifters on the street??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Doug520, Sep 26, 2023.

  1. Doug520
    Joined: Apr 21, 2016
    Posts: 255

    Doug520
    Member

    I'm having a 354 Hemi built. No way I am going flat tappet. I've wiped out a cam on another type engine and I refuse to go through that again. I just don't need the stress, expense and work again. As they say, fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

    That leaves me with a roller cam, either hydraulic or solid rollers. Adjustable rockers are now up near $2K so it's gonna be adjustable pushrods on non adjustable valvetrain. I've never adjusted adjustable pushrods, all I know is what I read, which leads me to believe they're a pain in the rear. That led me to lean toward hydraulic rollers, given the solids, while normally easy to keep adjusted, might not be so easy to keep adjusted with the adjustable pushrods thrown into the equation. Also a factor is that most of my experience is with Ford FE engines, and in the FE running solids on the street is frowned upon. Supposedly they get beat to death with street use and fail fairly rapidly. Is that the case with these Hemi's as well?

    That led me to lean toward hydraulic roller lifters. However, as I started down that road, it seemed to be that basically few go down that road on these engines. I've never really gotten an answer to why that is. In fact, there really isn't a hydraulic roller lifter specifically made for the early Hemi. Many say the big block Mopar lifters fit. Others claim small block will fit. Essentially everyone winks and says "wellllll, yeah, we can MAKE it work.." I'm not real happy with that.

    With flat tappets being 100% off the table, what to do??? This is easy in most other engines. In this 354 Hemi, it's not. Ideas, Hemi guys?
     
  2. slayer
    Joined: Jun 5, 2005
    Posts: 2,073

    slayer
    Member

    Dad and I just swapped his 392 Hemi from a Risky solid flat tapped cam to a Schneider reground roller with Water man hydraulic roller lifters. The lifters are the same ones that market for big block Mopar. Adjustable push rods are a *****, but modified wrenches like can help a lot. These are what I use. IMG_20230623_142914382.jpg
    I almost forgot, we have put no miles on the new combo so far. I can't speak to the durability of the rollers.
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2023
    vtx1800, mad mikey and seb fontana like this.
  3. Mike VV
    Joined: Sep 28, 2010
    Posts: 3,329

    Mike VV
    Member
    from SoCal

    Doug -

    There's basically two types of solid roller lifters.

    1 - The old fashioned, roller bearings on an axle. They work...until they, suddenly don't ! The bearings will break, they can come out of their race. Once the bearing fails, so does a lot of the engine. Nothing new, happens a LOT.

    2 - The newer design "bushing" style bearing. There's nothing to fail and come apart ! Only a lack of oil will cause them to fail, and even then, it's "only" that lifter, not most of the engine.
    The only thing,,.they are more expensive than the older style lifters.

    Both will work on the street...ONE...will be safer !!

    Most all roller lifters can be bought in either design these days.

    Mike
     
  4. Doug520
    Joined: Apr 21, 2016
    Posts: 255

    Doug520
    Member

    That's a similar story to the FE engine as well, Mike. I have a car (I think its HAMB friendly but I won't mention type so as not to be deleted) with a 520" 744 HP FE in it, and it's got the Crower Enduramax bushed solid rollers in it. Damn they were pricey. All in all I think I'd prefer the hydraulic rollers, but it seems the only way to get them in there is kind of a bootleg "this oughta work but we can't really say that" scenario. It's just weird. It's hard to believe no one makes a hydraulic roller specifically for this engine, and if it's the same lifter as the big block Mopar, why don't they just come out and say it rather than beat around the bush with comments like "it's worked for others but we can't officially recommend it". I almost feel like I'm doing a drug deal when I talk to the cam companies about hydraulic rollers for this engine, it seems like whispers and winks while making the deal.
     
    mad mikey likes this.
  5. PackardV8
    Joined: Jun 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,326

    PackardV8
    Member

    Yeah, we Hamburgers can't understand why lotsa manufacturers don't make custom parts readily available for seventy-year-old-obsolete engines. If you think 354" hemi parts are scarce, build Packard V8s. BTW, we use Mopar roller lifters in those ;>)

    One of the reasons the manufacturers are vague about which roller lifters fit your 354" is the lifter bore spacing for the paired link lifters for solid rollers. The OEM hydraulic lifters don't use links, but custom spiders which match the later blocks.

    And yes, adjustable pushrods are a gigantic PITA; once in frame, running the overheads require four hands working in the back corner where there isn't room for two.

    jack vines
     
    vtx1800 and 73RR like this.
  6. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    I used Gaterman rollers in a 392 package. Gaterman lists them for the B&RB engines and they were a perfect fit in the 392. I can't offer any reason that they don't list the EarlyHemi as an application.
    Schneider made the cam, damn fine job!
    As to adjustable rockers, they are fine for solid lifters but I do not use them on a hydraulic due to the limited oil groove/window in the screw that is not compatible with 0.060 preloads.
     
  7. Stan Back
    Joined: Mar 9, 2007
    Posts: 2,738

    Stan Back
    Member
    from California

    I tried hydraulic lifters to no avail (There's another subject like this that explains that to me 20 years later). I went back to solid lifters and my rocker arms that had Audi(?) adjusters in them -- that was all 20 years ago. I've adjusted them once in that time. It's not a race engine and I don't drive it daily, but I can understand how it works.

    Engine.JPG
     
    Mikus Maximus and RodStRace like this.
  8. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 9,050

    RodStRace
    Member

    Speaking as a guy that does not work for any auto manufacturer, I'd guess the reason they don't say "fits all BB mopars and early chrysler hemis" is because they have not tried them in a dozen motors with 100% success. One customer motor with a different lifter bore spacing, casting height, oiling p***age variability, lifter bore size (all possible with 50s production tolerances), or just plain loose nut behind the wrench install will mean they have bought something that is hard to locate and acquire for someone who is going to be unhappy no matter what.
    US consumers these days want it cheap, fast and good, with a warranty. Unless it can be proven that it does work in every case, it's not worth the liability to include the sentence for a dozen (or 100) sales a year. I'm not knocking you, OP. It's just the world we live in. They quite possibly already have had someone come back after buying a set who had issues. Unless they were able to identify the exact root cause and be able to determine how to check and possibly fix the issue and then communicate this to potential customers, it's better to simply say that it is on the customer to check fitment. Especially on a 'high performance' part which we all know has little to no warranty and will be used in something like your street driven low lift, low spring pressure, low RPM engine to the guy that is past 3/4 inch lift, 500 pounds spring pressure and is winding the RPM up like he's 5 feet behind going into the traps in the finals at Bakersfield.
     
    gimpyshotrods and 73RR like this.
  9. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,556

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have Johnson hydraulic rollers in my blown 354, and a set of bent wrenches in my tool box.
     
    mad mikey likes this.
  10. PackardV8
    Joined: Jun 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,326

    PackardV8
    Member

    What p/n Johnson lifters and how are they held in alignment?

    jack vines
     
  11. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,556

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I will see if I still have the box.

    They have a bar.
     
  12. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,374

    Budget36
    Member

    Hey Mike,
    Do you know if OEM hydraulic roller lifters use a bushing? The GM style with the spider tray.
     
    Desoto291Hemi likes this.
  13. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,556

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    2311BBR, big block Dodge.
     
  14. PackardV8
    Joined: Jun 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,326

    PackardV8
    Member

  15. Hemi Joel
    Joined: May 4, 2007
    Posts: 1,655

    Hemi Joel
    Member
    from Minnesota

    Some roller lifters, usually the cheap ones, rely on splash lubrication to the axle. These are trouble on the street. Lack of oil during extended idle can waste them, also start p in the spring after a long hibernation.
    As far as I know, all bushed rollers have pressurized oil routed to the axle. And some of the needle bearing rollers have it. As long as you have pressurized oil to the axle, they will be fine on the street.
     
  16. jrvariel48
    Joined: Aug 8, 2011
    Posts: 160

    jrvariel48
    Member
    from New Jersey

    I need a little help deciding if I should go solid or hydraulic roller for a blown 354 build.
    Are solid or hydraulic lifters better for a lower/higher boost motor or is it just preference?
    This will be a street motor build, but I would like to build it strong enough if I decide one day to run 10lbs of boost instead of 5lbs. I've done a ton of reading on the Tech section, but most of the posts don't answer the questions I have.
    I'm using the factory crank which was magged etc. and is 10 under on the rods and 20 under on the mains.
    I'm not looking to build a 1000hp motor, but I also don't want stuff breaking my I get on it.
    Thanks
     
  17. Hemi Joel
    Joined: May 4, 2007
    Posts: 1,655

    Hemi Joel
    Member
    from Minnesota

    The hydraulic is generally good for 6000 RPM or so. If you're going to spin it much higher than that, you need to go with the solid.
     
    gimpyshotrods and Budget36 like this.
  18. jrvariel48
    Joined: Aug 8, 2011
    Posts: 160

    jrvariel48
    Member
    from New Jersey

    OK I don't think I'll be going past that rpm! Are there any other performance gains with either? Is one set-up better s for higher boost etc?
     
  19. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,556

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The performance gain from solid lifters is negligible on a street engine.

    Just make sure that you have good quality valve springs.

    If you want more power, change pulleys.
     
  20. jrvariel48
    Joined: Aug 8, 2011
    Posts: 160

    jrvariel48
    Member
    from New Jersey

    That's good to know, thanks for the info!
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  21. jrvariel48
    Joined: Aug 8, 2011
    Posts: 160

    jrvariel48
    Member
    from New Jersey

    Is anyone running a Herbert 8620 steel billet roller cam? What other manufacturers offer billet roller cams?
     
  22. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,748

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have one in the 327 in my avatar with solid lifters. However, the lifters are modern with tie bar links. I have a little over 6000 mi on the engine.
     
  23. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,556

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yes.
    PXL_20240901_203349068.RAW-01.COVER.jpg
    This one is a hydraulic grind.

    I have Johnson hydraulic roller lifters.
     
  24. jrvariel48
    Joined: Aug 8, 2011
    Posts: 160

    jrvariel48
    Member
    from New Jersey

    That sound promising! Thanks
     
  25. jrvariel48
    Joined: Aug 8, 2011
    Posts: 160

    jrvariel48
    Member
    from New Jersey

    Are you using #2311BBR lifters?
     
  26. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,556

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Indeed I am.
     
  27. jrvariel48
    Joined: Aug 8, 2011
    Posts: 160

    jrvariel48
    Member
    from New Jersey

    Great thanks.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.