Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Really hard pressure plate. Need help!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by farmer013, Aug 24, 2024.

  1. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,851

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I wonder how much friction is in the bellcrank pivots?
     
  2. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 5,211

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Probably not the issue but back in HS a buddy converted his 6 cylinder Nova to a V8. The Nova had a 3 on the tree but the V8 was a junk yard special out of an automatic car. Everything went together just fine but the clutch peddle was hard to the point it wouldn't work. After strengthening the Z bar it still wouldn't work. So he had it towed to a shop. Car was back the next day. It helps to install a pilot bushing. :cool:
     
  3. farmer013
    Joined: Feb 23, 2016
    Posts: 88

    farmer013
    Member

    Pilot bushing is definitely in there haha
     
  4. farmer013
    Joined: Feb 23, 2016
    Posts: 88

    farmer013
    Member

    I've got full travel of the master cylinder, so I dont think that's a problem. Doesnt seem to bind or anything
     
  5. farmer013
    Joined: Feb 23, 2016
    Posts: 88

    farmer013
    Member

    No bell crank installed, just the slave cylinder straight to the clutch fork
     
  6. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,851

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I meant the bellcrank pivots between the pedal and the master cylinder.

    Might be helpful if we could see the entire pedal and master cylinder setup, from a couple different angles
     
  7. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 5,900

    Fordors
    Member

    Have you checked the pedal ratio?
     
  8. Doublepumper
    Joined: Jun 26, 2016
    Posts: 1,669

    Doublepumper
    Member
    from WA-OR, USA

    Not much leverage from the short top pivot.
     
    warbird1 likes this.
  9. Happydaze
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 2,151

    Happydaze
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Well that's a good start!

    What's the pedal travel like (in inches) at full travel of the master, a) dry, b) wet, ie fully bled etc.

    My guesses are a) a couple of inches or so, and b) almost nothing, as its solid. Very happy to be wrong though!

    Chris
     
  10. farmer013
    Joined: Feb 23, 2016
    Posts: 88

    farmer013
    Member

    Pedal travels about 6" to move the master cylinder about 1 3/8"
     
  11. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,851

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    you probably want closer to 6:1, than the 4.3:1 ratio you have.

    Still would like to see how the whole pedal setup works...
     
    warbird1 likes this.
  12. farmer013
    Joined: Feb 23, 2016
    Posts: 88

    farmer013
    Member

    Sorry, I'm trying to upload a video so it makes more sense, but it's not working.
    I'm starting to rethink the clutch as the problem now as well and thinking I may just drop this whole levers, cylinders etc. U could be chasing this for weeks and now I'm leaning more toward the hydraulic throw out bearing. I know they can have there own complications but who knows where this set up is going
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Aug 27, 2024
  13. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,851

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    thanks for the pictures..but they dont show the pedal. I can't see if it's up all the way. It makes a difference, the pivots all need to be perpendicular when the pedal is in the middle of it's travel, or it won't work right
     
    Algoma56 and Happydaze like this.
  14. farmer013
    Joined: Feb 23, 2016
    Posts: 88

    farmer013
    Member

    Sorry
     

    Attached Files:

  15. Happydaze
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 2,151

    Happydaze
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    There's quite some work in that installation and if looks to be nicely done and finished. However the additional pics confirm, we'll in my eyes, that the clutch pedal is way too short and thus can't provide the leverage and travel to produce the required pressure and flow. Take a look at the Kugel setups, the pedal pivot is high up at the master cylinder level. The acid test here is the pressure at the slave.

    Whilst looking at the Kugel stuff do check out the ratio of the bellcrank. Looks to be 1:1 as best I can see.

    Unlike some I'm happy to use a hydraulic throwout bearing but you still need the pressure from the master so the pedal arrangement will still sucker you as it is. Tough love.

    Do please share the dimensions of everything between the pedal pad and the master.

    Chris
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2024
    warbird1 and squirrel like this.
  16. Happydaze
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 2,151

    Happydaze
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Glad someone else spotted this too! With the latest pics I can now see 3 places where there is some loss of movement, which will all compound the situation without considering the losses at the business end. And that's without the pedal ratio issue.

    Chris
     
  17. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 10,603

    BJR
    Member

    Looks like you loose your leverage advantage with the top bellcrank. I would think it should be at least 1 to 1 or the opposite way that it is now, with the short arm to the master cylinder to gain mechanical advantage.
     
    warbird1 and Doublepumper like this.
  18. farmer013
    Joined: Feb 23, 2016
    Posts: 88

    farmer013
    Member

    Damn it! Back to square one I guess. I'll start messing with it in a few days.
     
    2OLD2FAST likes this.
  19. This^^^
    That's some beautiful work on the entire system; but that top bellcrank is a major part of the problem.
     
  20. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,347

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    Just throw that whole system out and install a hydraulic throwout bearing and be done with it. [McLeod make one for the A833]
    It will clean up the whole mess under there [and leave more room for exhausts etc]

    Some people are skeered of this new fangled technology , but they have been reliable on modern vehicles for the last 20 years.
     
  21. gene-koning
    Joined: Oct 28, 2016
    Posts: 4,710

    gene-koning
    Member

    NOT TRUE!
    The biggest problem here is in the pedal to clutch master operation. If that was correct, I suspect the hydraulic set up he currently has at the bell may well have worked.

    Add me to the list that believe the issue with the pedal linkage is at that top pivot. The rod lifting up to that top pivot can only move up until it makes contact with the other lever in that pivot, and that is not enough to push the rod into the clutch master far enough. I believe the pedal end of the top lever needs to be 2x longer pivot point hole to pedal rod hole (maybe more) then it currently is. You are probably only getting about 1/2 of the clutch master's stroke, and that is not enough to release the pressure plate. As is, about the time it starts to release the clutch, the master runs out of stroke.

    There may still be issues at the bell as well, but the top bell crank problem has to be solved first.
     
  22. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,347

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    That's not the point of my comment.
    Start eliminating areas where people get out of their depth [usually geometry]

    I would start with a hydraulic throw-out bearing [this eliminates clutch fork and slave cylinder angles and leverage]
    Then proceed to the pedal assembly which looks like a geometry nightmare.

    upload_2024-8-29_19-8-35.png

    All that complicated bellcrank could be eliminated with a simple reverse mount M/C
    upload_2024-8-29_19-17-38.png

    Or simply alter the existing bellcrank and mount the M/C further up the steering column out of sight.
    Use a M/C with a remote master cylinder with a long pushrod and a heim-joint at the bellcrank
    upload_2024-8-29_19-36-25.png
     
    warbird1 likes this.
  23. 69fury
    Joined: Feb 24, 2009
    Posts: 1,631

    69fury
    Member

    In looking at the pics of your linkage, it seems that every extra piece makes your lever ratio worse and worse.

    First pic in post #52---- the red hashes and the blue hashes added show you have the opposite ratio than needed. Would help alot if you could just flip that bellcrank or at least make a new one that was 1:1...

    The Yellow hashmarks in pic one also could be moved closer together. Do you have the ability to pop another hole in that arm and move the attachment closer to the pivot?


    -rick
     
    Kerrynzl likes this.
  24. farmer013
    Joined: Feb 23, 2016
    Posts: 88

    farmer013
    Member

    The top pivot doesn't go up, it goes down, so no interferance there
     
  25. farmer013
    Joined: Feb 23, 2016
    Posts: 88

    farmer013
    Member

    I'm going to do something similar to that now
     
  26. 2OLD2FAST
    Joined: Feb 3, 2010
    Posts: 5,747

    2OLD2FAST
    Member
    from illinois

    You could put the pedal back under the floor & use mechanical linkage , If I can do it in the confines of a T bucket body/ frame , I ll bet you can make it fit under your car ...
     
  27. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,347

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    Get a piece of round tubing with the ID the same as the column OD
    Cut it longitudinally [1/2 round channel] and weld a bracket for the M/C mount onto it.[this can be gusseted]
    Seat this piece up against the steering column drop so it wont move and clamp it with 2 Mikalor clamps

    upload_2024-8-30_14-36-54.jpeg

    here is the Mikalor clamps
    [​IMG]

    Doing it this way allows for the column to drop through the firewall [non rag joint /universal joint style]
    And saves welding to the column

    Then alter the bell-crank as previously suggested
     
  28. Happydaze
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 2,151

    Happydaze
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    @Kerrynzl, interesting idea but did have me scratching my head at first, mounting the master to the column? Wild!

    I'm not seeing that working though as the pedal itself is just too short. With the pedal arm shortened to get an appropriate pedal ratio the arm will be too short to give the inch plus to fully stroke the master. The pedal has to be lengthened which will require the mount / pivot point to be raised. We'll, that's as I see it!

    Chris
     
  29. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,347

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    You clock the lever [blue arrow] so it is perpendicular to the M/C pushrod.
    The lever can be lengthened or shortened to the desirable ratio, so the pedal itself can remain the same length.
    upload_2024-8-30_21-40-11.png

    The clamp on bracket is just a mounting method [for columns attached to the steering box]
    The M/C mounting bracket does not need to be perpendicular to the column [neither does the M/C need to be parallel to the column]

    The easiest method is to clock the lever first and get the correct ratio at the same time.
    Then use a string line to mimic the path of the M/C pushrod and M/C centreline. [then the M/C bolt mounting bracket mounting angle can be figured out.
    once the string line has been established , you can also cut out a cardboard silhouette, and place it up there to see what is happening [this is much easier than fabricating something only to find out later it won't fit]

    It doesn't need to be parallel, it can be triangular shaped.
    The M/C pushrod can be lengthened and a heim joint used at the lever end.
    @farmer013 will have a few leftover heims as only one is needed.

    This is easy to figure out on paper, but the string line method is the most practical for those who lack trigonometry skills [math]
    Try figuring this shit out on a racing car where the driver's feet, steering column, rack, pedals, balance-bar, 3 M/C's, and rocker suspension are all competing for the same real estate :D:D
     
    warbird1 and Happydaze like this.
  30. Happydaze
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 2,151

    Happydaze
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    @Kerrynzl, yep, got that, but if the actual pedal is undersize (like a scale model) with 6 or 7:1 factored in I think its unlikely the master pushrod will see enough travel, 1.12" approx, to work properly, as the scale model meets the full size world.

    Chris
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.