Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Trifive Gasser Front Straight Axle Shackles?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by brigrat, Oct 23, 2024.

  1. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 5,947

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

    1957 Chevy with a '57 Chevy truck axle, spring shackles in front or in back of spring AND why? On the truck Chevy must have spent a little R&D on this subject and decided to install shackles in front. I see gassers both ways. Pro's, Con's?
     

    Attached Files:

    Deuces and chryslerfan55 like this.
  2. Mike VV
    Joined: Sep 28, 2010
    Posts: 3,249

    Mike VV
    Member
    from SoCal

    As you say, have been done both ways over the years.

    But, think about this -

    1 - The "load" (from the road) is trying to push the wheels...backward...right. Therefore, "swinging" back and forth on the shackles.

    2 - The "braking" action, is trying to push the wheels...backward...right. Therefore, "swinging" back and forth on the shackles.

    3 - Any sort of wheelstanding, the "load" will try to push the wheels...backward, upon the landing...right. Again..."swinging" back and forth on the shackles.

    Who the hell wants the front axle moving back and forth on a swing set ? A thing to remember. The rear portion of the spring...IS...a spring, right ? It will bend...just as "springs" are meant to do.
    Again, the spring is NOT a solid member!


    So...do you really want the front axle flopping around on loose shackles...having a sloppy connection the frame in front, of the axle...or..do you want the spring held solidly to the frame (shackles in the REAR), so the axle will have a MUCH less tendency to move back and forth on the swinging shackles, therefore the steering will be, again, MUCH more solid, the braking will be more firm and connected to the ground.

    Personally, I'd NEVER put the shackles in the front.

    Mike
     
  3. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,930

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    IF done right you will have some anti dive during braking if shackles are in the front. Where the steering box is and weather side steer or cross steer can be other factors.
     
    69fury and brigrat like this.
  4. Marty Strode
    Joined: Apr 28, 2011
    Posts: 9,431

    Marty Strode
    Member

    I put them in the front on this 55, works great. Lonnie wheelie.jpg IMG_3738.JPG
     
  5. 57Fury440
    Joined: Nov 2, 2020
    Posts: 365

    57Fury440
    Member

    I have them in the back of my axle. It has been like that since the sixties and works great. It was done for most of the reasons Mike VV stated.
     
    brigrat likes this.
  6. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,304

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    I've always put shackles on the opposite side of the drag link. So if your steering box is behind the axle I put shackles at the front. Or if it's in front I put shackles at the rear.
    The theory is that the drag link pushes sideways as you turn the wheel, and it's better to push against the fixed eye end of the springs instead of pushing against the shackles that can deflect.
     
  7. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 5,947

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

    All stock '57 truck components so it's a side steer.
     
  8. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 10,694

    BJR
    Member

    Every production car or truck the I can remember had the shackles in the front, there must be a reason the factory did it that way. If you have or know of a stock vehicle that has the shackles in the rear post it up. I have no knowledge of why they were built that way from the factory, so that would be interesting to know also if someone has real knowledge of why.
     
    seb fontana and Deuces like this.
  9. Unkl Ian
    Joined: Mar 29, 2001
    Posts: 13,509

    Unkl Ian

    Ever seen a rear axle, with parallel leafs, and shackles on front ?

    Steering type and box location, would make a difference on front.
    I have seen it done both ways.
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2024
    BJR likes this.
  10. Chucky
    Joined: Mar 15, 2009
    Posts: 1,814

    Chucky
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    More theory but, I think typical frame side profile shape being usually higher (off the ground) in the very front (or very back) versus the mid section.

    That, combined with the typical shackle being taller than the typical solid mount makes placing the shackles at the outer most ends of the frame the most sensible.

    In other words, it’s typically easier to achieve a flat or level spring pad mount by placing the shackles at the outer most ends. I’m strictly looking at this from a mass production viewpoint. In the end, it’s whatever works for you.
     
    lostone and BJR like this.
  11. If I'm not mistaken my O/T 78 f250 and 74 power wagon both have shackles at the rear, solid mounted at the front.
     
    BJR likes this.
  12. Doublepumper
    Joined: Jun 26, 2016
    Posts: 1,679

    Doublepumper
    Member
    from WA-OR, USA

    My '46 pokey bar pickup has shackles on the rear of the front springs...factory cross steer, box behind the axle.
     
    BJR and Unkl Ian like this.
  13. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,304

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    Stock weren't cross steer, they were push-pull drag links with steering arms hanging down.

    Parallel leaf shackles for rear axles have little to do with front axle shackles. The side loads on a rear axle are simply generated by cornering, not by a drag link pushing or pulling. And the shackles at the rear have only small effect on steering geometry.
     
    BJR likes this.
  14. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,304

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    My Austin gasser had shackles in the rear with the factory setup. I also kept the shackles in the rear since I used a Corvair van box and cross steer in front of the axle. The stock steering was push-pull, so shackle location was really not relevant as it is with cross steer. And most old trucks with shackles up front were also push-pull steering, not cross steer.
     
    brigrat and BJR like this.
  15. Fitty Toomuch
    Joined: Jun 29, 2010
    Posts: 357

    Fitty Toomuch
    Member
    from WVa

    In all my research when building mine, this is the proper design.
     
    BJR likes this.
  16. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,930

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    51 New Pics 019.jpg 51 New Pics 017.jpg Front springs should have a slight angle to rear; i.e. rear spring eye distance to ground less than front, absorbs road trauma better. Where you put the shackles can achieve that with a given frame design/contour. I put the axle in my Shoebox with the shackles in the front with cross steer box ahead of axle. I also have a panhardt bar. Power 605 box, works well.
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2024
  17. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,123

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The 4x4 brigade has big discussions on placement of the shackles and the reasons why but they may not apply to straight axle parallel leaf spring rigs.

    As for Chevy trucks from the 30's to 59 one big difference was the shape of the frame rail it's self. Even back to the 20's Chevy had the front springs solid mount on the front and the shackle on the back but the frame curved down to the point where the spring mounted. Come late 47 and AD trucks and the rail is pretty well straight to he end.
    Chevy cars had the leaf springs mounted to the frame at the front with Shackles at the back up through 39.
    Chevy trucks changed in 38 if not earlier. The GM Heritage Center archives don't show the leaf springs on the earlier rigs.

    These images from 38 to 57 skipping between 49 and 56. On a jacked up "gasser" with way more Screenshot (1422).png Screenshot (1423).png Screenshot (1424).png Screenshot (1419).png Screenshot (1425).png Screenshot (1426).png weight due to the weight of the axle it isn't going to handle all that great at any rate.
     
    brigrat likes this.
  18. lostone
    Joined: Oct 13, 2013
    Posts: 3,289

    lostone
    Member
    from kansas

    A simple cut and paste from the other thread i replied to:

    Rear shackles give a better ride. It allows the spring to "follow" the bumps in the road.

    The spring reacts and moves backwards as it travels thru the compression. A front shackle moves the spring forward into the compression.

    Yes it's not a lot of movement but it's enough you will feel it giving a somewhat harsher ride, look how many oem's still use a front shackle ? And the couple that do, do it because of clearance problems to the rear mostly.

    On a gasser it doesn't matter, your going 1/4 mile at a time on a flat surface, no rail road tracks or large pot holes to deal with.....
     
  19. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,304

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    Unless your car is hitting very tall bumps like a curb at speed, the location of shackles front or back wont make a difference in how the springs compress. The axle moves slightly towards the shackle end is really so minor and the axle's movement is mostly up and down with very little directional change.
    If your axle has a panhard bar as Seb Fontan's car has it wont matter which end the shackles are on as the panhard bar negates any side deflection.
     
    brigrat likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.