Register now to get rid of these ads!

Oil Filter Adapters For Chevy 1962-1963 Impala

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by jumbogem29, Feb 4, 2025.

  1. jumbogem29
    Joined: Feb 2, 2010
    Posts: 612

    jumbogem29
    Member
    from Alabama

    Any good recommendation on a oil filter adapter for a 327 screw on filter type thanks
     
  2. 427 sleeper
    Joined: Mar 8, 2017
    Posts: 3,231

    427 sleeper
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Bite the bullet and put the the canister back on. Alot less headaches.
     
    squirrel and SS327 like this.
  3. poco
    Joined: Feb 9, 2009
    Posts: 1,478

    poco
    Member
    from oklahoma

    427 sleeper How do you think the canister is better and less headaches?
     
  4. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 20,806

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    A real headache if you don't take the old (square) o-ring off!
     
    tractorguy, SS327 and TrailerTrashToo like this.
  5. 427 sleeper
    Joined: Mar 8, 2017
    Posts: 3,231

    427 sleeper
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The adapter plates don't warp, crack or come loose, making a big oily mess because a canister doesn't have all that crap. It's not that hard to replace the o-ring when you replace the filter either. Maybe I'm just lucky, but I've never had a problem with the canister leaking. On the other hand, I've never had any luck with the aftermarket adapters... EVER.
     
    tractorguy and SS327 like this.
  6. Dave G in Gansevoort
    Joined: Mar 28, 2019
    Posts: 3,179

    Dave G in Gansevoort
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    Look at it in another way. You can check for metal in the filter with the canister system much more easily than spin on filters, as there is no cutting of the filter required. This way you can keep better track of engine condition. And like 427 said, just pay attention to the square gasket. The only time I had one leak, was the 1st time I changed one way, way, way back when, and didn’t know about removing the old gasket. Yeah, I was only 16 and I knew better…
     
  7. I took down a canister on a '67 Belair at work maybe in '75. The car would put the Exxon Valdez to shame.

    The canister with filter was 3x the normal expected weight. I had to let it rinse in the Safety Kleen sink for too long. Up in the filter recess, I dug out 3 old square o-rings.
     
  8. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 20,806

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    And.....you haven't lived if you haven't had an oil covered canister slip out of your hand and fall into the drain pan of oil!:eek:
     
  9. Dave G in Gansevoort
    Joined: Mar 28, 2019
    Posts: 3,179

    Dave G in Gansevoort
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    Or worse, the dirt in the driveway. Then start cleaning again
     
  10. SS327
    Joined: Sep 11, 2017
    Posts: 3,350

    SS327

    Overall I like the canisters better. But spin ons are cheaper and easier to get. When I get my choice I always go canister.
     
    427 sleeper likes this.
  11. My '66 Belair has the spin on adapter. I also had one on my 396. I think it makes things easier.

    Harry Homeowner, back in the day, would tend to drop the oil and skip the filter change.
     
    TrailerTrashToo likes this.
  12. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 58,180

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I went back to canister on mine. It's just like the old days.
     
    tractorguy and 427 sleeper like this.
  13. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 20,806

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Chevy II's had spin-on filters in 1964!
    64-67 283 and 327.


    upload_2025-2-6_13-34-3.jpeg
     
  14. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 20,806

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Oh yeah, why is this thread in the OT forum?
     
    TA DAD, squirrel and The Chevy Pope like this.
  15. jumbogem29
    Joined: Feb 2, 2010
    Posts: 612

    jumbogem29
    Member
    from Alabama

    To answer your question because it is OT . Off Topic where else to get good info .
     
  16. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 20,806

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I'm baffled as to why you would think that!
     
  17. jumbogem29
    Joined: Feb 2, 2010
    Posts: 612

    jumbogem29
    Member
    from Alabama

    Really!!! You must be retired and have nothing else to do but criticize peoples post. You post on the hamb to gather info evidently you dont have any pertaining to this post so i am baffled as you put it. Where else to post for questions any good ideas ?
     
  18. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 20,806

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Absolutely not criticizing, just needing a clarification, wasn't directed at anyone, especially not you.
    First, I try to steer clear of drama if possible and yes, I'm retired, not sure the relevance.
    I rarely criticize peoples' posts, again, missing your point.
    One of us is missing something here, I do know that this subject is dead square in the middle of the HAMB's "general discussion" (pre 1966), category, see title.
     
    hotrodharry2 and TA DAD like this.
  19. downlojoe33
    Joined: Jul 25, 2013
    Posts: 808

    downlojoe33
    Member

    Every early small block I’ve owned has been treated to the spin on adapter. And that’s been a bunch over the years. Never had a problem, or a leak. If you put them on correctly, and remove the square original gasket, there should be no issues. YRMV. And if you want to check for metal filings , just carefully pour most of the oil out of the filter into your drain pan but catch the last bit, that’s where the filings would settle anyway. Less messy, less hassle, less time than the canister. Just one man’s opinion.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.