Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Ok, Ford FE gurus let’s talk

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Roothawg, Feb 18, 2024.

  1. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,505

    Roothawg
    Member

    Sharpone likes this.
  2. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,505

    Roothawg
    Member

    @Jeff Norwell where did you say those sexy exhaust manifolds were from? I thought you told me Sanderson, but I didn't see them on their web page.
     
    Sharpone and Jeff Norwell like this.
  3. Oneball
    Joined: Jul 30, 2023
    Posts: 1,308

    Oneball
    Member

  4. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,505

    Roothawg
    Member

    Sharpone, SilverJimmy and Oneball like this.
  5. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,505

    Roothawg
    Member

    Bump for the Ford crowd.
     
    bchctybob, Sharpone and Boneyard51 like this.
  6. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,628

    Boneyard51
    Member

    Those are actually better than the originals! Kugel took the short comings of the shorties and improved then. One thing I know they did was cast thicker flanges!



    Bones
     
  7. SilverJimmy
    Joined: Dec 2, 2008
    Posts: 588

    SilverJimmy
    Member

    Does anyone know if the Kugel manifolds fit on trucks? I have a 1973 F-100 with a 390 and C-6 waiting it’s turn and really hope those manifolds fit! Don’t want to fight headers and the stock manifolds SUCK!
     
    Sharpone, Roothawg and Boneyard51 like this.
  8. 6sally6
    Joined: Feb 16, 2014
    Posts: 2,720

    6sally6
    Member

    I always 'heard' how stupid-heavy those 390 intake manifolds are until I "helped" my boy work on his 390.
    HOLY-MOLEY !!!!!!!..
    We ended up with a 2X4 hooked to the intake and both of us lifting it in place ...
    Just replacing that thang and the heads should reduce the front end weigh of a truck/car a good 250 pounds!
    MPG or two ??!
    6sally6
     
    Sharpone, Roothawg and Boneyard51 like this.
  9. Boy, you hit the nail on the head there! Stock FE exhaust manifolds are terrible at best. Those Kugel units look real nice.
     
    Sharpone and Roothawg like this.
  10. Jeff Norwell
    Joined: Aug 20, 2003
    Posts: 15,101

    Jeff Norwell
    MODERATOR
    Staff Member


    I would rather eat glass than buy Sanderson.....

    I used a vintage Hedman and a set of OEM Ford Shortys on each of my cars.
     
  11. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,415

    Beanscoot
    Member

    I'm curious why Sandersons are on the bad list.
     
    Roothawg and warbird1 like this.
  12. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,415

    Beanscoot
    Member

    Okay, I see now.

    [​IMG]
     
    Sharpone and Roothawg like this.
  13. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,505

    Roothawg
    Member

    OK, my Alzheimers was kicking in.....I couldn't remember who you said. :cool:
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  14. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,505

    Roothawg
    Member

    So what is the deal with the little overflow tanks inline with the radiator? Did the FE's run hot? Surge tanks, I have heard them called. Have to run them?

    [​IMG]
     
    bchctybob and Boneyard51 like this.
  15. saltflats
    Joined: Aug 14, 2007
    Posts: 12,987

    saltflats
    Member
    from Missouri

  16. deathrowdave
    Joined: May 27, 2014
    Posts: 4,229

    deathrowdave
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from NKy

    Tank does a couple of things as I’m told , it has a cap on it to fill coolant , and it places cap higher than the block , most cars fitted with them had a cross flow radiator and it was lower than the top of da block
     
  17. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,628

    Boneyard51
    Member

     
    bchctybob, 2devilles and Sharpone like this.
  18. Those first appeared in 1958 on the redesigned Thunderbird although the initial design was a bit different with a smooth rounded top. The new body design with its low hood line didn't leave a lot of room for a conventional top tank radiator. Ford decided that those tanks would be a good solution for the redesigned 1960 full size cars for the same reason and allow for a larger crossflow radiator in the same space if needed. These were only used on the full-size cars/Thunderbirds with the exception of the Thunderbolt and 427 Cobra. When Ford redesigned the full size Ford again in '65, they were gone, although they hung around on the Thunderbird through '66. But it's not uncommon to find a '60-64 Ford car without one and converted to a 'regular' downflow top tank radiator as they proved to be a bit troublesome in actual use due to issues with cracking/leaking. And while these are most commonly associated with FEs, the '60-64 Ford full size used them for all motors, even the lowly 223 six.

    Ford also used similar tanks on the early FT-powered cabover big trucks, but those won't fit a car application.
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2025 at 11:27 PM
    bchctybob, warbird1, Roothawg and 4 others like this.
  19. SilverJimmy
    Joined: Dec 2, 2008
    Posts: 588

    SilverJimmy
    Member

    I think that it is designed to help get air out of the cooling system. My 2004 F-350 diesel has the modern equivalent and it’s called a “De-Gas” tank. So maybe Ford was way ahead again?
     
    Roothawg likes this.
  20. Jeff Norwell
    Joined: Aug 20, 2003
    Posts: 15,101

    Jeff Norwell
    MODERATOR
    Staff Member


    It's not so much that they are on a Bad List..... they are a very good Header and flow well.
    I just don't care for 1 800 Streetrodder stuff.
    Just feel(my opinion only)... that alternatives are out there.
    And I feel the same way about any block hugger header.(On ANY engine.)(and yes.I have owned them)If they need to be use, so be it......
    Please take no offence to those who run them.

    And yes.. those Log style factory FE exhaust manifolds are probably thee worst exhaust solution you can run on an FE.... but again.... a good set of FE Headers are gonna run you $800 and northward.
    Getting a good exhaust system on an FE will greatly improve the engines performance.
     
  21. corncobcoupe
    Joined: May 26, 2001
    Posts: 8,158

    corncobcoupe
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    And Jeff is the FE Einstein.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Word.
     
  22. Jeff Norwell
    Joined: Aug 20, 2003
    Posts: 15,101

    Jeff Norwell
    MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    HAHAHAHA
    Your very kind Cob...but that would be a BIG no..... I just try to soak up as much as possible about things I am passionate about.....
    there are people on this board and THIS thread ... That have 10000000% more knowledge than I.

    I just listen.....
    Anyhow... I am glad @Roothawg is still moving forward on this and stoked to see he wants to build a 445 stroker..... because. that's is BADASS.
     
  23. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,505

    Roothawg
    Member

    @Crazy Steve Makes sense.
    @deathrowdave, that also helps clear it up.
    Just trying t figure out if it was a bandaid for an inherent problem. Sounds like more of an engineering work around.
     
    bchctybob, Sharpone and Jeff Norwell like this.
  24. Oneball
    Joined: Jul 30, 2023
    Posts: 1,308

    Oneball
    Member

    Pretty much every car made nowadays has a separate header tank to ensure it’s the highest point of the system. I don’t think there’s any inherent issue where Ford put it. But the one monumentally stupid thing they did was putting the thermostat vertically in the joint between the tank and the intake!!!!
     
  25. I'll glue the 'stat in place with a couple of real small dabs of super glue before installing the housing...
     
  26. Frames
    Joined: Apr 24, 2012
    Posts: 5,204

    Frames
    Member

    Looking for a free FE engine near Milwaukee, Wis. for mock up. Building a recreation of this iconic #6. Finished 2nd in points in M S C 1958 against a field of S B C's. Schwister built tube frame  1957.jpg
     
    sidevalve8ba likes this.
  27. Good luck with free... Around here, anything that's rebuildable is worth $300-400. Rusty bare blocks are bringing $100.
     
    bchctybob and Roothawg like this.
  28. 6sally6
    Joined: Feb 16, 2014
    Posts: 2,720

    6sally6
    Member

    Bundle.2dougs-headers-a.jpg
    Please don't "whine" about hard-to-install-long-tubes !! The 'music' is well worth the skinned knuckles & cuss words !
    6sally6
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.