Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Cast Iron Heads

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by MUNCIE, Jan 6, 2025.

  1. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,380

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Quick question guys with the Isky chrome moly pushrods what size rocker arm should I get? How do I determine the size like 1.5 or 1.6 ?
     
  2. Tickety Boo
    Joined: Feb 2, 2015
    Posts: 1,732

    Tickety Boo
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    I always run the rocker arm ratio recommended on the cam card specifications, they have engineered the cam for that gross lift. ;)
    Then when bolting on aftermarket heads or if the block deck or the heads have been resurfaced, always measure for the correct length push rod with rocker arms you're going to run
     
  3. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 4,910

    ekimneirbo

    I'd check your valve to piston clearance at TDC and at 10 deg BTC and after TDC. I'd rotate your piston up to those 3 positions. Take your rocker arm and valve spring off one cylinder. Let each valve sit on the piston. Put a 1" travel dial indicator on top of the each valve stem and move the valve upward to see how much travel you have before it seats. That tells you how much you can open a valve before contact occurs.

    Then take the amount of cam lift and multiply it by 1.5,1.6,and 1.7 and compare that number to the measurement you got on valve movement before it hits the piston. You need to allow a certain amount of clearance when the valve is at max lift so it does not contact your piston.. Different people will tell you different amounts of clearance.
    A lot depends on how high an rpm you plan to rev the engine.

    You also need to measure your valve springs and see that they are capable of moving the same distance as the valve lift and still have some room before bottoming out (coil binding). Put a spring in a vise and tighten the vise till it just makes the spring bottom out. Measure the distance between the vice jaws.

    Now put a retainer on a valve without any spring and pull up to seat the valve. Measure the distance between the valve seat and the retainer.

    The valve seat to retainer measurement minus the bottomed out spring measurement will tell you how much your springs are capable of moving before bottoming out. That measurement is the absolute maximum you want your valve to move.

    So you have to find what factor above limits your valve movement and select a rocker ratio that works slightly less than the limit.

    If you can use a 1.6, it should help performance better than a 1.5. Get something with a roller tip or full roller if you are going to spend any money.
     
    MUNCIE likes this.
  4. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 20,795

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Those numbers relate to the ratio, size is generally a diameter callout along with a length dimension.
    As with any part, the intended use and/or combination of components will dictate the ratio, oem rocker ratio is 1.5 for sbc, for a purely street car there's no need for anything else, besides the mfg suggestion, many engine builders may choose ratios, sometimes intake only, sometimes exhaust only, sometimes both.
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2025
    Tickety Boo and MUNCIE like this.
  5. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,358

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    Since both of my engines have guide plates it helps eliminate most sideways pressure. The full roller rockers are very expensive, but stamped steel roller tip rockers are very reasonably priced, and not that much more than stock type quality stamped non roller tip rockers. For the small extra of roller tips I'm happy to pay the price. I'm not a fan of full rollers just because of the extra needle bearings that I think add to another place they might fail. Plus the stamped roller tip rockers fit under stock valve covers, which is a nice bonus.
     
  6. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 4,910

    ekimneirbo

    What you said are some good points. The sideways pressure I was referring to is from the perpendicular motion as a rocker arm moves (drags or rolls) across the top of the valve stem, which occurs in all OHV engines . As the rocker pushes down it also pushes the valve stem against the side of the guide (side of the vehicle).

    You are referring to sideways as any motion due to erratic movement (front or back in relation to the vehicle which is still a sideways movement as far as the valve guide is concerned) . Just wanted to clear that up, as both are considerations depending on the components selected.
     
    Tickety Boo, 1971BB427 and MUNCIE like this.
  7. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,380

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    I appreciate all the information on here guys. I really enjoying learning as I work through this build. When I get the heads back I will post a quick picture of them.
     
    ekimneirbo likes this.
  8. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,358

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    Yes, that's why I like roller tip rockers as they don't drag across the top of the valve stem. Less friction, less wear, and a slight HP gain.
     
  9. Stock Racer
    Joined: Feb 28, 2010
    Posts: 1,205

    Stock Racer
    Member

    Super Stock heads must check at factory port and chamber volumes for the engine/horsepower claimed. It takes hours and hours of welding and epoxy work to build a competitive set of heads that will check legal. Very different thing than what is being discussed here.
     
  10. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,187

    327Eric
    Member

    IMG_20250209_145205.jpg IMG_20250125_123828.jpg IMG_20250209_131510.jpg IMG_20250209_133044.jpg Speedway double humps vs oe. I had to grind slightly in the exhaust manifolds to clear the valve cover. It's back up and running which was the goal and looks close enough to how I started
     
    Tickety Boo and Truckdoctor Andy like this.
  11. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,380

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Speedway double humps vs oe. I had to grind slightly in the exhaust manifolds to clear the valve cover. It's back up and running which was the goal and looks close enough to how I started.
    :) I never knew they made a replica style head to the OE Camel hump. Would you happen to have a picture of your alternator side set up since these do not have any holes drilled? Might want to add these to my SBC 283 one day.
     
  12. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,187

    327Eric
    Member

    IMG_20250209_144846.jpg
    No good pics. It is 66, ,67 Chevy truck manifolds and brackets 1967 manifold in my case. Mounts to the front of the manifold, not the side, with a bracket that bolts to the manifold and water pump for the bottom bolt IMG_20250209_144846.jpg
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2025
    Tickety Boo likes this.
  13. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,380

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    No good pics. It is 66, ,67 Chevy truck manifolds and brackets 1967 manifold in my case. Mounts to the front of the manifold, not the side, with a bracket that bolts to the manifold and water pump for the bottom bolt View attachment 6317231 [/QUOTE]
    I see that, thanks for the details on the manifolds and bracket.:cool:
     
  14. big john d
    Joined: Nov 24, 2011
    Posts: 435

    big john d
    Member
    from ma

    i still run a set of pro top line alloy sbc heads they were bought out by rhs but i am pretty sure still made in Australia or new Zeeland
     
    Tickety Boo and MUNCIE like this.
  15. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,615

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    here are a couple of pictures of my alternator setup in my '40. It uses a stock Chevy mount and adjustment strap. I welded a part onto the drivers side header ( which I built).
    DSCF1349 (800x600).jpg DSCF1351 (800x600).jpg
    IMG_2826.jpg

    These 2 pieces can be used with manifolds or headers , but do not move the alt. up enough to clear the valve cover. They were used a lot in the '60s and maybe '70s. They are not very elegant but could be modified pretty easily.
     
    Tickety Boo and MUNCIE like this.
  16. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,380

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Did you make the 60's style as well? I like those. With my SBC283 the valve covers do hit the back of my alternator.
    The cast iron heads that are in the machine shop are a set off a 66" 289 block with the slotted push rod holes.
     
  17. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,187

    327Eric
    Member

    He is using the same Chevy truck lower bracket as I have, with a homemade bracket to support the back with headers. Very nice. I will copy this when I put my headers on, as it provides superior support over the side mount header Mr Gasket bracket
     
  18. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 20,795

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    :eek:
     
  19. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,380

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Understood, thanks.
     
  20. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,380

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    It's been stroked to 308...:D
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.