Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 8" Ford rear gear ratio advice

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by atch, Feb 16, 2025.

  1. atch
    Joined: Sep 3, 2002
    Posts: 5,985

    atch
    Member

    Hi folks,

    The 3.0/1 8" Ford rear in Clarence is needing a new ring/pinion set. It whines on deceleration and while I'm no mechanic my more knowledgeable friends tell me that the ring and pinion gears need to be replaced.

    Clarence
    3,500 pounds (+/-)
    GM 190 hp crate 350; 4bbl Edelbrock carb; block hugger headers w/ dual exhaust

    EDIT:
    trans is T-350 with 1:1 high gear
    stock torque convertor


    current gears are 3.0 to 1
    rear tires are 28" tall
    current gas mileage is 15mpg
    not the most aerodynamic vehicle out there but none of our rods are

    There are a multitude of gear ratios available.

    Clarence is a long-distance cruiser. Minimum 10K miles per year. Since the hamb drags no longer exist acceleration isn't really a consideration. If I live long enough to finish it my 400hp, 3,000 pound, 4-sp, '31 Model A will satisfy any need for speed.

    I want to get the best possible gas mileage after gear replacement as we drive this thing a lot. I can live with replacing the existing gears with more 3.0 to 1 gears and keep on getting 15mpg but better mileage would be a plus.

    What gear ratio would you recommend for my usage?

    b-t-w; price fluctuates wildly by brand. Richmond Gear seems to be the most expensive but is about the only brand name that I'm familiar with. They, imo, certainly have the good reputation.

    Any suggestions regarding brand of gears?
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2025
    Sharpone likes this.
  2. Rodney Dangercar
    Joined: May 19, 2024
    Posts: 63

    Rodney Dangercar
    Member

    Transmission in your car? As far as gear maker, get US Gear/Strange if you are looking for Made in USA. I have a set of Strange 3.55's for my 8 inch that I'm getting ready to tear in to.
     
  3. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,025

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Leave what is in there.
     
  4. I would leave the 3.0 or go to a 2.79
     
    lemondana, Sharpone and Just Gary like this.
  5. atch
    Joined: Sep 3, 2002
    Posts: 5,985

    atch
    Member

    oops...........

    I forgot to mention trans is T-350 with 1:1 high gear
    stock torque convertor
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  6. atch
    Joined: Sep 3, 2002
    Posts: 5,985

    atch
    Member

    @gimpyshotrods,

    Are you saying if I can live with the noise that it won't hurt to leave it as is?
     
  7. I bet the Edelbrock carb could be leaned down some and maybe a little more ignition advance.

    Your 3:00 gears have the engine rpm: 60mph 2200 rpm
    70mph 2500 rpm.

    I'd say stick to 3:00 gears with that transmission, or maybe 2:87?

    Gears are not going to do much for your fuel economy.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2025
    Sharpone, Just Gary and Oneball like this.
  8. guthriesmith
    Joined: Aug 17, 2006
    Posts: 11,031

    guthriesmith
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    1. H.A.M.B. Chapel

    Mike, I would pull it apart and see what’s going on. Make sure the ring and pinion look ok and have the correct backlash, etc. Maybe it needs a pinion bearing or something? If you do end up needing new gears, I would likely stick with 3.00 like what you have. Sounds like a pretty good highway cruiser now.
     
    sdluck, Algoma56, Sharpone and 3 others like this.
  9. flamedabone
    Joined: Aug 3, 2001
    Posts: 5,612

    flamedabone
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    A nice set of 355s would go down smooth, but you would need an overdrive for sure. Not sure how much a Gear Vendors is these days, 2500? Hate to spend that kind of money, but it would be a life changing event for Clarence.

    -Abone.
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  10. onetrickpony
    Joined: Sep 21, 2010
    Posts: 822

    onetrickpony
    Member
    from Texas

    Whine in deceleration could just be a pinion bearing but if it has been bad long enough, it could cause R/P damage.

    There aren't many higher options for a Ford 8". I think 2.79:1 is pretty much your only common option if you want to go higher. It's not really much difference on only 10k miles a year. I once swapped from a 3.70 to a 2.75 in a 9" Ford and the mileage actually got worse.
     
  11. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 58,117

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You're not gonna get better mileage, it's a big vehicle and 15 mpg is pretty good for what it is. I think this is what gimpy is alluding to....keep the ratio you have, since it works.

    I'd pull it apart and look it over, and see if it does just have worn bearings...but be prepared for changing gears. If you're not doing the work yourself, then you should probably talk to whoever is going to be replacing the gears, and let them get the brand they are most confident in. Since you want them to stand behind their work.
     
  12. 2OLD2FAST
    Joined: Feb 3, 2010
    Posts: 5,815

    2OLD2FAST
    Member
    from illinois

    With the multitude of mid sized fords that came with an 8" -3.0 gear , I'd find a good used center section & swap it out ...
     
  13. TexasHardcore
    Joined: May 30, 2003
    Posts: 5,392

    TexasHardcore
    Member
    from Austin-ish

    Put 2.73's in it if you want better MPG, it's not enough of a ratio change to affect how it drives around town.
     
    lemondana likes this.
  14. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,489

    RodStRace
    Member

    I agree that pushing a brick isn't going to win any MPG contests, if you really want to improve, there have been books written, but it boils down to straight tracking low rolling resistance tires and having the engine at the lowest RPM where it develops the most torque and vacuum.
    As for the rear, they aren't making more, so if you are a junkyard guy, go grab another with the same gears. I don't know all the nuances of interchange, so research that. Once you have that and gaskets and fluid, pop out the current one. Compare on the bench and at that point decide on a swap or repair. You are probably under 200 bucks until you start digging deeper.
     
    Sharpone and Slow down like this.
  15. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 4,904

    ekimneirbo

    Here is some info..........
    Ford 8-9 a 001.jpg

    Ford 8-9 b 001.jpg

    Ford 8-9 c 001.jpg

    Ford 8-9 e 001.jpg

    Ford 8-9 f 001.jpg

    Ford 8-9 g 001.jpg

    Ford 8-9 h 001.jpg

    OK, Thats the tech info, now here is some info on how to build a "Quiet" 9". They are very similar to the 8 inch, so maybe this will help you.

    Quiet 9 inch 1 001.jpg

    Quiet 9 inch 2 001.jpg

    Quiet 9 inch 3 001.jpg

    Quiet 9 inch 4 001.jpg

    Quiet 9 inch 5 001.jpg

    Quiet 9 inch 6 001.jpg

    Quiet 9 inch 7 001.jpg

    Quiet 9 inch 8 001.jpg

    OK, thats all I've got but you might want to buy a copy of this book off Amazon.The stuff above is not from this book.

    Ford 9 Inch Book 001.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  16. jaracer
    Joined: Oct 4, 2008
    Posts: 2,794

    jaracer
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Your 3.00:1 ratio is probably the best for what you want. If the deceleration whine just started, I'd at least pull the pinion to check the bearings and pre-load. If they look good, I'd probably pull the center section and check it over; gear teeth and bearings. If it is all good, you need to decide if you can live with the noise or not. Changing the pinion depth and/or backlash to get the perfect gear tooth pattern probably won't change the noise. That is if all the bearings are in good shape and the pre-load is correct. What it will do is change the speed the noise comes in.

    The last ring and pinion I did, I purchased from Yukon Gears. It was a nice, quiet gear set. Drove the car for 20 years after the rear end rebuild.
     
  17. atch
    Joined: Sep 3, 2002
    Posts: 5,985

    atch
    Member

    Holy cow!!!

    That's a lot of reading. I'm not going to attempt that on this phone. Next time I'm sitting at my computer with the larger screen I'll read/study all of that.
     
  18. hepme
    Joined: Feb 1, 2021
    Posts: 616

    hepme
    Member

    Those 8"are well know for noise. I had one in a coupe, 3:55 I think, it had only about 30-40K on it and howled on descent. I figured the gear, got another one and got another noise, even better than the first! Other guys told me they had the same experience with them and to learn to live with it.
     
  19. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,025

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yup, the ratio is already optimized.
     
    sdluck, Truckdoctor Andy and Tim like this.
  20. jaracer
    Joined: Oct 4, 2008
    Posts: 2,794

    jaracer
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    When I worked for a heavy truck leasing company, we did a lot to measure and work on fuel economy. The largest single factor to improve fuel economy was the operator. You want better fuel economy, drive a steady speed. Cruise control helps with highway economy. Anticipate stops and back off early. The more you use you brakes, the more you have to use the throttle. Every time you open the throttle, even a little, you give a little squirt from the accelerator pump. Don't idle unecessarly. Run radial tires properly inflated.
     
  21. You might want to give some thought to an upgrade. The Ford 8" was considered a 'medium duty' rear axle internally at Ford and they limited its use to 302 or smaller motors in the lighter small and intermediate models. If a 351 or 352 was specced, you got a 9". You're running more cubic inches and vehicle weight (particularly if you use it to haul any weight) than it's rated for. Full-size cars (before they 'downsized' them) got the 9" regardless of engine size because of the weight issue. The problem wasn't with horsepower, it was torque rating. The '62-64 axles had issues with premature pinion bearing failures so Ford did do an upgrade starting in '65, with only slightly larger bearings due to design limitations. That mostly eliminated the problem but not completely in non-stock use such as what you're doing. Ford dropped the design in 1980.

    A 8.8" will be the least expensive choice, with nearly the same strength as a 9". The problem here will be gear ratio as Ford started supplying OD transmissions in many vehicles at the same time it was introduced, so 'tall' non-OD gears can be a bit rare, as well as finding one compatible with drum brakes.

    You can get whatever you want in a 9", but it probably won't be cheap....

    The 8" axles still have value when used right, you may be able to sell it and put a serious dent in the cost of an 8.8 swap. Something to think about...
     
    Truckdoctor Andy likes this.
  22. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,344

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    You need to check out the noise, so drop the 3rd member and check it, or have it checked. But if it needs a new ring and pinion I think the 3.00 to 1 is a great ratio for highway and city. I personally think taller 2.74-2.79 gears will make you unhappy for city driving around town. They will be nicer at freeway speeds, but make it doggy at slower speeds.
     
  23. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,418

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    Just read the first page and take @2OLD2FAST 's advice and buy a whole drop out head.

    At 65 mph with a 3.0:1 you should be cruising at 2480 rpm [this is allowing for 6% converter slippage]
    If you install a 2.78:1 you would cruise a 2306 rpm at 65 mph
    The 2.78:1 is not a desirable ratio , so you could pick one up dirt cheap to try out.


    If you're towing keep the 3.0:1 gears. [but run a decent trans cooler]
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2025
  24. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,418

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    The difference between the 3.0 and 2.78 in 1st gear up at 1600 rpm is only 1.7 mph [converter stall speed of 1600 rpm]
    Once the vehicle is rolling the difference is hardly noticeable [over 5mph which is walking pace ]

    This above should be considered
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2025
    rod1 and Sharpone like this.
  25. lostone
    Joined: Oct 13, 2013
    Posts: 3,305

    lostone
    Member
    from kansas

    I agree with above, I'd check pinion bearings first. If they are good then I'd look at gears.

    I'd just stick with the 3:00 gears, not a big enough jump to really notice a difference and as also stated I'd doubt gas milage would change.

    My old firebird had a 400, auto and 2:56 rear gears and was a dog, went to 3:23 gears and much funner to drive and I would bet no more than .5 miles per gallon difference.

    One thing I noticed is the engine revved smoother, ran smoother on the road. I figured it was because the motor didn't have to work as hard to move the weight down the road..... it now how torque multiplication to help it....


    .....
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  26. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 5,246

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Back during the '70's gas crisis/van craze one of the van mags did a spread/test on ways to improve gas mileage. Of all the "improvements"/modifications the only noticeable improvement was removing the side view mirrors. Vans of that era had the same aerodynamics as does Clarence. i.e. brick. Just a thought.
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  27. rusty rocket
    Joined: Oct 30, 2011
    Posts: 5,201

    rusty rocket
    Member

    I have 300’s in my 32 sedan but have a T5 . I like the gear, I can motor at 80 all day long but a turbo 350 might be winding it up a bit.
     
  28. Weedburner 40
    Joined: Jan 26, 2006
    Posts: 1,049

    Weedburner 40
    Member

    Gear ratios and fuel mileage will depend a lot on how the engine is built and your driving habits. The 3.0 is probably the best one for your truck. As for the strength, I have run e" rears behind some pretty strong 350's without problems but, in light weight cars. The small bearing 9" uses the same axle and axle bearings as the 8" so the weight capacity would be the same. The small pinion bearing can be a problem but, I imagine that Clarance isn't much heavier than my avatar (3500 #), which has a small bearing 9", so the only time that would really come into play is pulling away from a stop or climbing steep/long grades. That being said, there have been some good suggestions here, like sourcing another 3.0 drop out unit, so you could replace the existing one, keeping the vehicle usable, then you can diagnose the problem with the current unit, or just pull it and check it out. The decel whine could be gears, pinion bearings or even a loose nut holding the yoke onto the pinion causing the bearings to be loose (had that happen one time).
     
  29. In_The_Pink
    Joined: Jan 9, 2010
    Posts: 882

    In_The_Pink
    Member

    Here are some 3.00 ratio Ford 8' ring and pinion options/prices from rockauto.com

    The Richmond Excel line uses a (partial?) recycled steel content:
    • EXCel gears are made from reclaimed 8620 steel for strength and durability
    The "regular" Richmond use new steel:

    • Made in Italy, at the highest quality manufacturing facilities
    • Made from Richmond's highest quality steel and cut from first run steel forgings
    I have used Motive Gear R&P gears in the past, and was happy with them. They are the cheapest, too, in this case:

    • Engineered to Motive Gear's specifications using a proprietary European spec'd alloy

    8ingears.png
     
    Sharpone likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.