Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Flathead Intake Manifold Exhaust Heat Block off

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by A 2 B, Feb 20, 2025.

  1. A 2 B
    Joined: Dec 2, 2015
    Posts: 558

    A 2 B
    Member
    from SW Ontario

    I'm putting my low budget rattle can rebuild Merc back together and decided to block off the exhaust cross overs, I read up on the pros and cons and one question came to mind. Has anyone here blocked off only one side in an effort to reap the benefits of both trains of thought? Would this eliminate the sound canceling effect of not blocking either but still allow some beneficial heat? Just curious on what to do.
    Today, I looked around in my s**** bins for something to block the p***ages off with and came up with a couple of Co2 cartridges of the correct diameter and cut the ends off. They make for a perfect fit. Saved a trip to the parts store. Just trying to decide whether to use one or both.
    DSC00053.JPG DSC00056.JPG
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2025
  2. Dak Rat
    Joined: Mar 8, 2006
    Posts: 576

    Dak Rat
    Member
    from NoDak

    I blocked off both sides on my 276" merc, I think it eliminates vapor lock. At least I've never had any.
     
    A 2 B likes this.
  3. 302GMC
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 8,478

    302GMC
    Member
    from Idaho

    Block both with pennies minted the year your block was cast ....
     
  4. Jack E/NJ
    Joined: Mar 5, 2011
    Posts: 972

    Jack E/NJ
    Member
    from NJ

    > >They make for a perfect fit. Saved a trip to the parts store.> >

    If this is a Canadian block, you're supposed to use Canadian pennies.
     
    302GMC and A 2 B like this.
  5. A 2 B
    Joined: Dec 2, 2015
    Posts: 558

    A 2 B
    Member
    from SW Ontario

    As far as I can determine it is a Canadian Merc, with both intake and exhaust hardened seats and rotator valves. 4" stroke, standard bore. Originally had car water pumps and crank pulley (narrow belts). Original green paint. That should place it early 1950. I have never had much luck deciphering casting dates on these blocks. The code on this one would seem to indicate 1950-3rd month-7th day? DSC00058.JPG

    Never thought of pennies. While my avatar flattie is being machined, bored, stroked, etc. this will be the temporary replacement.
     
  6. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,218

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That doesn't look like a dare code to me. More than likely a rebuilder's code, especially given the "QC".

    Have you seen this?

    "The number stamped on the top right rear of the manifold surface is a production date code (if it's there at all; not all engines have it).

    Here ya' go :

    Flathead Date Code On late model flatheads without the bell housing cast into the block, there is a code stamped on the right rear corner of the intake gasket face of the block which will give you the manufacturing date of your flathead Ford or Mercury. You can see it with the intake manifold and heads still on the engine.
    It consists of a series of a letter, a one or two digit number, and a second letter. The first letter is the month. The number is the day, and the second letter is the last digit of the year.
    The letter code is M=0, G=1, B=2, L=3, A=4, C=5, K=6, H=7, T=8, R=9, S=10, E=11, F=12.
    G 20 B would be an engine manufactured on January 20, 1952."
     
    A 2 B and adam401 like this.
  7. A 2 B
    Joined: Dec 2, 2015
    Posts: 558

    A 2 B
    Member
    from SW Ontario

    Thanks tubman but that "Flathead Date Code" doesn't seem to be relevant on the 4 Canadian blocks I've had but it is on my one US flathead. That number in my pic is the one ***igned by Ford of Canada and is in the same location used in the USA.
     
  8. ronnieroadster
    Joined: Sep 9, 2004
    Posts: 1,185

    ronnieroadster
    Member

    I pretty sure Canadian penny's will fit perfectly in those heat riser holes. Saving two cents by using the bottoms of those Co2 cartridge's is the ultimate in low buck building I guess :confused:
    Ronnieroadster
     
    Algoma56 and A 2 B like this.
  9. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,218

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'll admit that my knowledge of Canadian built engines is almost non-existent, but I'd still bet against that being a date code, although anything is possible.
     
    A 2 B likes this.
  10. A 2 B
    Joined: Dec 2, 2015
    Posts: 558

    A 2 B
    Member
    from SW Ontario

    Yes they do , I just tried one. In my view, a little on the thin side for an interference fit though. What's the worse that can happen?

    Yep, I'm not knowledgeable in the history or practices of the era in either country but it is interesting noticing the differences.
    I'm just hoping to find out if blocking one side only will retain the unique sound harmonics we like as well as be somewhat helpful in providing some needed heat and also prevent vapor lock. It will be fun experimenting with it. I'm sure the particulars of any build will factor in the results.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.