Register now to get rid of these ads!

9s for $9k

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by squirrel, Mar 18, 2025.

  1. Weedburner
    Joined: Nov 16, 2010
    Posts: 275

    Weedburner
    Member
    from Wa State

    I know you want some room for suitcases, but a non-running 1st gen RX-7 with ratty paint will check a lot of your boxes. Lots of room for an LS in the engine bay. Stock tunnel is bigger than any 60's musclecar, it fits a T56 without mods. Subframe connectors from the factory. 16.4gal fuel tank on the '84-85 models, more if you add a sump. These cars come from the factory with a rubber bushed 4 link in the rear, I removed the upper links and built a torque arm for mine.

    Explorer 8.8 with two short side axles is exactly the right width to fit 275/60-15 drag radials on common 15x8 wheels with 5.5" backspace. I used brackets from the stock RX-7 rear on my 8.5 10 bolt. With a iron head sbc and iron 4spd, typically around 2500lbs. Mine weighs 2525 w/ 200lb driver, fibergl*** hood, stock seats, factory gl***.

    Mine has run 5.73 with a 1.30 60', stick shift on dead hooking radials. No roll bar or ch***is reinforcements of any kind. Still no cracks or buckling in the body after 31 years of sbc power...

    [​IMG]

    Here's a link to more pics of engine compartment and under the car as it was back in 2008...
    https://grannys.tripod.com/20101.html

    Grant
     
    1Nimrod, Chucky, BigJoeArt and 19 others like this.
  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,061

    squirrel
    Member

    I haven't seen any RX-7s sitting around anywhere for a while....

    but that's a sweet ride!
     
    RodStRace and porkshop like this.
  3. Rons 56
    Joined: Feb 12, 2025
    Posts: 14

    Rons 56

  4. rockable
    Joined: Dec 21, 2009
    Posts: 5,150

    rockable
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have a buddy who built a bad*** sleeper Fairmount with twin turbo LS. He sold it and now is building his second one. It's his drag racing toy and it is very compe***ive.
     
    TexasHardcore and porkshop like this.
  5. Baumi
    Joined: Jan 28, 2003
    Posts: 3,383

    Baumi
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Uncle Tony is playing with XJs lately.... I think he called it Mission Improbable. I got his quite quick for what it is.
     
    porkshop likes this.
  6. I just read through your whole build, and updates. I didn't know you are the Clutch-Tamer guy, that's rad! Any 2025 updates on the RX7?
     
    porkshop likes this.
  7. noboD
    Joined: Jan 29, 2004
    Posts: 9,012

    noboD
    Member

    Jim, you don't seem to mind driving ugly critters. So go for the Jeep. I approve this message.
     
  8. fastcar1953
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 4,186

    fastcar1953
    Member

    swade41, porkshop and loudbang like this.
  9. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,061

    squirrel
    Member

    I think that one wrecked. It's a race car, I'm looking to make a sort of fast, low buck street car. But it sure shows what you can do with one!
     
    Rawrench, porkshop and SilverJimmy like this.
  10. fastcar1953
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 4,186

    fastcar1953
    Member

    Yeah it had 4.56 gears 3800 stall etc. A milder street version should get in the 9's.
     
    porkshop likes this.
  11. mcgyver
    Joined: Aug 15, 2006
    Posts: 242

    mcgyver
    Member

    60's Jeepster Commando? Idk the weight, but the no engine or trans roller I have seems to be very light.

    Postal Jeep? Pretty short wb, they are fun but not sure I'd want to go 9's in one.
     
  12. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,061

    squirrel
    Member

    I looked at a few of those earlier jeeps before getting into the xj. They are pretty rough if you find a cheap one, though. And the most likely candidate was the Willys Wagon, late 40s-mid 60s. There are some around, but they also get pricey if they're complete and not trashed. There's a guy nearby who has a row of them at his place, wagons and pickups.
     
  13. riv63
    Joined: Feb 2, 2008
    Posts: 237

    riv63
    Member
    from Texas

    How far are you willing to travel? There is a $750 AMC Hornet close by.
     
    porkshop likes this.
  14. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 9,222

    RodStRace
    Member

    porkshop likes this.
  15. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,061

    squirrel
    Member

    I decided I didn't want to deal with bringing another 60-70 year old car back to life. I've done enough of them already.

    I'm planning to get the XJ in a couple days.
     
    bobss396, swade41, Baumi and 5 others like this.
  16. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 9,222

    RodStRace
    Member

    Considering the effort on the 'vette, the Checker, the cuda, and others I missed, I get that!
    Good luck on the Jeep, and if you need a hand up here, just let me know.
     
  17. That is definitely the truth They just vanished.
    I had one when I was 19 to 20, 302 c4, pretty low on the power numbers in stock form but it definitely took a beating that a 20-year-old guy that thought everything was a race car could give it and even with the stock drivetrain they had the potential to be fairly stout. I always wanted a two-door with the vinyl top and I wanted to set it really low and make it look like a late 1970s pro street car. When I was first getting into cars I used to read Rod and custom every month and there was an issue ***led Dare to be different and I've always stuck to that motto so a Granada is a mainstream platform that nobody touches that I would imagine is fairly lightweight being a midsize from the gas crunch era.
    Anyways I was thinking the other day All the mundane cars from the '70s and '80s just kind of vanished I think there's more mundane cars from the '50s and '60s is still floating around then there are some '70s and '80s cars.
    As an example the other day I thought to myself for about a minute that it would be pretty cool to own a Chevy Monza from the mid '70s, you know the one with the body kit and the V8 (My friend have one it was called a Monza mirage I believe it was a 1977) and I looked in the cl***ifieds and I only found a couple of them and if course they were race cars, I wanted one that said 1977 cool you know the over the top graphics, t-tops snd bright colored interior.
    It's very strange all that stuff just disappeared. I would do a Dodge Magnum from what was that about 1977 for a race car That might be kind of fun and you just don't see them.
     
    Phillips and porkshop like this.
  18. You are correct but that's only 2 to 3 tenths of a second generally speaking And It would stand out I would imagine anybody under 40 probably don't even know what one is unless they are a serious gearhead.
     
    porkshop likes this.
  19. The first couple of years of those cars they came with a 302 which means if you don't want to go crazy trying to modify a car to fit LS you could probably get a Ford Explorer 302 from around 2001 and I'd imagine it would drop right in with the right engine mounts. The only bad thing is with a Mustang everybody knows They have the potential to be fast... Although I guess that doesn't matter I'm thinking street racing where the goal is to dupe your compe***or lol
     
    porkshop likes this.
  20. I have pushed my fair share of Cherokees in my lifetime lol I mean obviously a lot of it has to do with tire choices but I got to say I'm pretty skeptical of them weighing in it 27 or 2,800 lb I would say 3400 maybe 36 is probably more accurate although I've never weighed one
     
    rod1, porkshop and squirrel like this.
  21. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,061

    squirrel
    Member

    from the 1988 Cherokee brochure. The 4wd stuff adds a few hundred pounds...I'm removing all that.

    Later ones were heavier, I expect it's the normal thing with adding sound deadening, and other features. Uncle Tony is often cited in this thread, he has a video where he compares a 98 2wd with a 98 4wd (both 4 doors) and says the 2wd is a bit over 3000, the 4 door is 300 lbs heavier. I intend to do a lot of weight removal, ie rear seat, sound deadener, hood, skinny front tires, etc.


    weights.jpg
     
  22. This thing is putting in work with a stock 5.3, cam, S480 turbo, and a TH350 with a transbrake.... 6.50's in the 1/8 (Low 10's in the 1/4)

     
  23. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,061

    squirrel
    Member

    That's my plan.

    PXL_20250326_175814134.jpg PXL_20250326_175823021.jpg PXL_20250326_175831494.jpg

    Janet says I need to get the ac working in the jeep if I expect to take her along
     
    Thor1, Nostrebor, Rawrench and 19 others like this.
  24. 57 Fargo
    Joined: Jan 22, 2012
    Posts: 6,256

    57 Fargo
    Member

    Just the right amount of ****py!
     
  25. hoop
    Joined: Mar 21, 2007
    Posts: 666

    hoop
    Member

    Looking forward to this build.
     
  26. Can I at least send you the Wild Cherry seat covers? That p***enger seat needs help! I want to be a contributor!!!
     
  27. 96-2000 explorer or mountaineer? Already has a 8.8 rear and leaf springs. Some were 5.0 powered too
     
  28. porkshop, Sharpone and squirrel like this.
  29. I skipped ahead and didn't see you were getting the jeep. Good luck, I can't wait to see it progress
     
    porkshop and Sharpone like this.
  30. Greg Rogers
    Joined: Oct 11, 2016
    Posts: 1,089

    Greg Rogers
    Member

    Hmmm, I'll bet you can make something interesting out of that- well if anyone can you can!
     
    porkshop, Sharpone and squirrel like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.