Register now to get rid of these ads!

Featured History Why don’t I see Plymouth/Chevy Hot Rods?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Ziggster, Apr 2, 2025.

  1. Ziggster
    Joined: Aug 27, 2018
    Posts: 2,250

    Ziggster
    Member

    Came across this on FB recently. Looks the part. I like the body lines, and if wasn’t so expensive, I would perhaps consider buying it, but then I’m thinking who would ever buy it if I decided to sell it since almost everything I’ve seen is a Ford. Why is that? Would be so cool to put in a 50s hemi into it.

    IMG_6330.jpeg
    IMG_6328.jpeg
    IMG_6329.jpeg
     
  2. Clydesdale
    Joined: Jun 22, 2021
    Posts: 337

    Clydesdale
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Isnt the popularity/survivability a lot to do with the amount of wood used in the body structure on early non-Fords?

    30k seems a lot to me but im not really in that market,
     
  3. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,930

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    The main problem with Chevrolets of the same vintage is that they stayed with wood for structural strength of the body shell, and over the years the wood would deteriorate and the body would fall apart. Also, since Ford flatheads were the first choice for hot rodding for years, it stood to reason that the rest of the Ford would be used as well.
     
  4. Termites suck
    The ford bodies had better proportions
    Production numbers
     
  5. Big Dad
    Joined: Dec 20, 2005
    Posts: 4,836

    Big Dad
    Member

    Plymouths and Dodges were used for dirt racing in early years , took the toll on the amount left
     
  6. oldolds
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 3,553

    oldolds
    Member

    Part of it hat to do with the fact that Henry made the Ford model T the cheapest car out there. They were good cars and plentiful. That developed brand loyalty. Then that v-8 engine came out and could kind of easily be made to fit the older cars. The other cars 6 cyl. might have been near as easy to do the same thing but the brand loyalty took over to lead the way .
     
  7. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,832

    RodStRace
    Member

    Brand loyality/early monolopy, hop up parts (4 cyl and V8), V8, body construction.
    The Mopar stuff was on par with bodies, adopted hyd brakes and independent suspension earlier, but didn't have the engines to compete with the popular Fords.
    GM had the body issues and the 6 again wasn't a V8, although they were raced.
    If it is all original and never apart, it's very rare, but that's a lot of money.
     
  8. There are a few threads on here for the other brands. We have a Chrysler assembly plant in our area, maybe that is why I see some more Dodge/Plymouth stuff. The wood thing is a real consideration- I think chev until 1937, some of the others until 1935. I do regret passing on a 34 Oldsmobile project. Some of the early grilles on the non fords were not especially conducive to a fenderless look.
     
  9. skooch
    Joined: Feb 7, 2007
    Posts: 617

    skooch
    Member

    As a strictly kustoms guy, I can’t tell the difference between one or another, they look the same to me
     
  10. guthriesmith
    Joined: Aug 17, 2006
    Posts: 11,175

    guthriesmith
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    1. H.A.M.B. Chapel

    Speaking of...a buddy just sent me this ad from Marketplace last night... $3500...

    1931 Chevrolet roadster custom · Convertible · Driven 23,552 miles 1931 Chevy homemade roadster built in 1959.... not running $3,500 clear title and very cool documents from 59-60 .. [hidden information] in Norman Oklahoma story of build below.. Kansas Teenagers Hotrod dream from 65 years ago A 16 year old Rod Koon from Kansas paid $10.00 for a Ford chassis August 15th 1959 and received a notorized bill of sale and then 2 weeks later he found a 31 Chevrolet coupe cab at J&K salvage for $1.00 and then started putting his poor man's Hotrod together ❤️ 324ci Olds 4 barrel engine 3 speed manual trans roof removed to build his own custom roadster The young man was very tall and chose to extend the cab for more leg room. A person can only imagine how many of these early Hotrod cars were built from American salvage yards with Dreams and pocket change.... It's worth mentioning that Rod's high school English 2 essay was written March 10th 1960 about this dream car and the teacher gave him an "A" !!

    487094601_4084977355122317_6547326792329479593_n.jpg 487092511_1906012630220786_1666989146296138901_n.jpg 487331407_3367492193381602_2659915110819358930_n.jpg 487282769_649101517982373_115725104407523067_n.jpg
     
  11. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,832

    RodStRace
    Member

  12. gene-koning
    Joined: Oct 28, 2016
    Posts: 5,002

    gene-koning
    Member

    I'm pretty sure the original production numbers would tell most of the story.

    Given Mr Ford's ability to produce large numbers of cars at very cheap prices is a big deal to over come, right out of the gate. More cheap cars produced means more cheap cars for the kids to start out with. Then add in the fact that Ford didn't change much on his cars for years means the simple cars had lots of replacement parts available, and they were cheap too. Cheap cars, cheap parts, interchange parts that covered for many years, all add up to a broke teenagers dream position. Probably the biggest reason Ford cars were so popular was because as a company, Ford had a 20 + year head start on building cars over most of the other brands. His creation of the production line, and the investment in production facilities gave the company a huge advantage that all the other companies had to overcome.

    GM (that didn't even become a car company until the 1920s) may have stood a chance with the hot rodders, if they would have moved the lower cost divisions on to a steel body structure 5-7 years earlier then they did. The more expensive GM divisions with the steel structures, were too over priced for the teenagers, compared to the Fords. The wood structure rotting out had a huge impact on affordable available body sources for those teenagers. By the time the cars were old enough to have the right price tag, the wood was already showing its future problems. That alone probably made the GM car lines less attractive to the teenagers until the later 1930s body styles, and those cars were bigger and heavier then the late 20s & early 30s Fords.

    Chrysler wasn't a car company until 1924. Dodge was a free standing company that started in 1917, mostly because of a conflict between the Dodge brothers and Mr Ford. The Dodge brothers were supplying most of Ford's drive train parts at that time. Mr Chrysler bought the Dodge motor company from the Dodge brother's estate after both had died in 1919. Plymouth was the cheap car division for the new Chrysler Corp. The biggest challenge Chrysler faced was not enough production facilities, can't sell cars you can't build.

    If you could balance the field with everyone starting production at the same time, with the same amount of production facilities, I have question if Ford would have been so popular for the early hot rodders. But history is history, and a 20 year head start is a big deal.
     
  13. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,467

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    I see mostly Fords simply because Ford sold more cars in this era. Then 2nd are Mopars around here, and then Chevys lastly. Late 30's I seem to see almost as many Chevys as Fords, and less Mopars.
     
    Tow Truck Tom, Joel W and Ziggster like this.
  14. Ziggster
    Joined: Aug 27, 2018
    Posts: 2,250

    Ziggster
    Member

    Thanks for the replies. Hadn’t thought about the wood issue. Really don’t know much about hot rods and the early history, so appreciate the feedback. I tend to gravitate towards the path less travelled, and prefer things that are apart from what the “masses” consider desirable, so would prefer something like this Plymouth, but again not at that crazy price. I see that Plymouth being no more than CAN$15K considering it’s still all orig other than the tires/rims.
     
    6-bangertim, 5window, RMR&C and 2 others like this.
  15. Here in the Sunny South we see a lot of Plymouths and Chevys, as some have pointed out the wooden structures in the early chevys is expensive to replace, the 35 and up chevys are real popular in my area and the Chryslers & Plymouths are were built like tanks and they little to wood. HRP

    Cool video.

     
    Joel W, CSPIDY, RDR and 4 others like this.
  16. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 21,087

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Does seem high considering what 30K would get you in other genres.
    Asking and getting are two entirely different critters, throw him an offer, he may bite.
     
    LCGarage and 5window like this.
  17. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,832

    RodStRace
    Member

    Production.
    Decided to look it up. Consumer Guide's Encyclopedia Of American Cars from 2001.
    They don't have a break down of Plymouth model production, but mention (pg. 722) nearly 107,000 for 1931.
    On page 399, it says that Chevrolet outsold Ford for 1931 but only by 4100 cars. Ford is broken down by model, so I had to add it up. 555,135 total.
     
  18. Even the Dodges are built to take whatever is thrown at them, check out this video. HRP

     
    lostn51, CSPIDY, Jalopy Joker and 2 others like this.
  19. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,832

    RodStRace
    Member

    For a better understanding of why so few chevys still exist, they were basically a carpenter's framework with a steel skin nailed on.
    I found this site from the picture. I haven't explored the site, but this should make anyone who isn't a competent woodworker shudder!
    https://1931chevrolet.com/restoration/
    Wood1.jpg
     
  20. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 10,245

    Rickybop
    Member

    Hang on to your wieners.
    I'm workin' on it.

    1120242102b.jpg
     
    winduptoy, -Brent-, EVL401 and 13 others like this.
  21. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,832

    RodStRace
    Member

  22. Blues4U
    Joined: Oct 1, 2015
    Posts: 7,842

    Blues4U
    Member
    from So Cal

    I dig early 30's Plymouths! IMO Plymouths have better proportions than Fords, especially the coupes. They have a little more leg room inside, and the roof is not quite as tall, they don't need a chop to look good. And they came with juice brakes long before Ford did. Fords have better styling with the grills/radiator shells, but Plymouths aren't bad. And since the engine compartments were designed for a straight 6 they're a little easier to fit an OHV V8.
     
    57Fury440, CSPIDY and das858 like this.
  23. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 10,245

    Rickybop
    Member

    Plymouths of that era are better built. The least wood. Much stronger frame. No comparison. Body too. And just a little larger. Three inches wider and six inches longer interior than the Ford. Flush fit doors. Etc.

    You could say the Fords are prettier than the Mopars. The Mopars do have awesome reveals. It's a matter of taste. And circumstance. I think looking for a hot rod project is kinda like looking for love. So much of it has to do with what's available. LOL

    Early on, it was all about the Fords. I think a Mopar build would have been more likely to happen in the later years. Early 60s. So that's what I'm shooting for.
     
  24. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 10,245

    Rickybop
    Member

  25. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,832

    RodStRace
    Member

    Along with all the other reasons mentioned, you gotta take into account that humans are herd/tribal/social creatures. I want to be different, just like everyone else! If the group is all running Fords, you probably are too.
     
  26. ALLDONE
    Joined: May 16, 2023
    Posts: 2,600

    ALLDONE
    Member

    480120470_10226183272910054_3523073354111347394_n.jpg

    thats why I bought this car... no wood/no rust...
     
    Okie Pete, rod1, lostn51 and 3 others like this.
  27. Ziggster
    Joined: Aug 27, 2018
    Posts: 2,250

    Ziggster
    Member

    Good to know being I’m 6’-6”. Despite what I said earlier, I really like the 32 Ford roadster, but likely way too small for me, so started looking more at the 33/34 Fords. In a way, I prefer their body lines and they seem bigger, at least seem to have more room under cowl.
     
    Tow Truck Tom and Rickybop like this.
  28. ^^^^ This. All the cool kids have Fords. I got turned down for the ROC because I have a Chevy.
     
    winduptoy, Tow Truck Tom and CSPIDY like this.
  29. Jalopy Joker
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 32,886

    Jalopy Joker
    Member

    I traded a Ford for a Plymouth that had a Chevy motor - guess met all of the criteria discussed 20210103_145554 (1).jpg
     
  30. dan c
    Joined: Jan 30, 2012
    Posts: 2,610

    dan c
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    if my memory's correct, pat ganahl was with "street rodder" magazine when he bought a '32 (?) chevy coupe with a 394 olds in it. he built a six for the car and it actually was faster!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.