Register now to get rid of these ads!

9s for $9k

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by squirrel, Mar 18, 2025.

  1. Didn't it already pass tech, how could've you made a mid 11 pass without passing tech ???
     
    427 sleeper likes this.
  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    it passed tech for 10.0, and needed it to make the 11.44 run it did.
     
    dwollam, Deuces, swade41 and 5 others like this.
  3. snoc653
    Joined: Dec 25, 2023
    Posts: 975

    snoc653
    Member
    from Iowa

    The only problem I found with bends is that depending upon method of bending the tubing is stretched. That can thin the outside metal of the bend to below wall thickness required. Do they and how would they check that is the magic question and you would know far better than most of us what work s and doesn’t. That’s why I bought my cage in kit form. Now I just worry about my weld neatness. No grinding and dressing the welds if I’m reading it correctly.
     
    squirrel likes this.
  4. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,361

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    From my Experience, National events race tech is By the Book to compete @ a event or race
    then a track that is NHRA Sanction,
    Pro Certifications are different then
    Passing tec ,
    My piping was built to Pro certification
    But I never Registered ,I do Not compete at a National Race / Event. When Eric was killed in early 2000's I had my chassis Up dated to New rule @ time just for peace of mind , in cage Area.

    NHRA has Made / Enforced certain Rules /Specs in Last 20 years then Went back to Old Rules ,
    One of was the use of
    ""Condition -N 4130 ""
    To ""Heat -Treated " a failure do to cracking , Back to "Condition -N ".
    The NHRA rule book that most of
    Use /Have seems to be Not Complete !
    I believe main Tech is Baker ? If I recall ,
    I have tried to reach a few times for Clarifications on Rule's because Hearing & seeing Racer's Disqualified
    @ National events & did Not see in Regular rule book .

    So National events more Restrictive
    then
    Local NHRA sanction tracks,
    I prefer the Black Sheep Track .
     
  5. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    That's the thing, isn't it? You automatically look for what it takes to pass a certification, when all the car needs to do is pass NHRA tech inspection at a track, for a speed that does not require certification.

    If you could point me to any NHRA/SFI documentation that specifies tubing diameter and thickness, after bending, for a 10.00 roll bar, I'd much appreciate it. But I think there is no such documentation, because a 10.0 roll does not require anything more than being made from 0.118 wall tubing, min OD 1.75" to pass NHRA tech inspection.

    I can't find any documentation for this for 8.50 and slower cars that need to get certified. The SFI stuff is only for 8.49 and quicker cars.

    Oh, thanks for the explanation of what it takes to build a cage for a fast car. It's neat stuff, and it's good to hear you're taking it with the seriousness that it deserves.
     
  6. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 21,476

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon


    So, with that being a unibody car, do you have plans to put diagonals in, pretty sure that is an "across the board" requirement for unibody cars, at least in regards to NHRA rules.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2025
  7. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    Thanks for the apology, but I think the issue runs pretty deep. I'm an engineer, and I'm pretty well used to reading drawings and specs and having to figure out what is required, vs what is a good practice, or whatever. Most of the folks doing fabrication and tech inspections on drag cars don't see the world quite the same way that us engineers see it.

    If you're doing work for people, you have a choice to do the minimum required, or do the best you can, or somewhere in between. You can make a legal roll bar or cage that looks like crap, but that isn't going to do your business any good.

    I haven't purchased the SFI documents to see if maximum bend deformation is specified in them, but it sure is not in the non-SFI NHRA regulations about cages and bars in 8.50 and slower cars. They say what material you have to use, but they don't specify that it has to maintain that diameter or wall thickness after being bent, nor what type of bending equipment is required. I think the are assumptions about this being made by a lot of people, and if these assumptions cause cars to fail tech inspections when there is no rule that says they should fail, then there is a serious problem with the tech inspection process.
     
    dwollam, Deuces, 41 GMC K-18 and 3 others like this.
  8. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    You really ought to read the rule book, and see if your assumption is correct. Keep in mind that this is a car that will run 10.00 or slower, and has it's original floor and firewall.
     
    41 GMC K-18 likes this.
  9. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 21,476

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Sold my car in 1980 in National Dragster (NHRA) magazine, haven't been back.
     
    squirrel likes this.
  10. oldolds
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 3,584

    oldolds
    Member

    @borntoloze. Sometimes you need to be careful how much you poke the giant. Those rules might be in a gray area now. You ask a question and they look at them it might mean a bunch of changes for a lot of people. I am not against safety requirements. But I would not drive fast cars if that was all I thought about!
     
  11. I'll add that all track are teched different even going by the rule book, it's based on who's interpretation of what.
    We have local guys that run at national events on a regular basis, they try to test n tune at the local track and the local tech nazi tells them everything that's wrong with their car and why it can't pass tech. Lol
     
  12. Harv
    Joined: Jan 16, 2008
    Posts: 1,384

    Harv
    Member
    from Sydney

    Somewhere up above us Smokey Yunick is reading this thread and grinning.

    cheers,
    Harv
     
  13. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    Just yesterday I described Smokey to someone. He's one of my heroes, I'm glad I got to meet him before he passed.
     
    Tickety Boo, dwollam, rod1 and 11 others like this.
  14. gene-koning
    Joined: Oct 28, 2016
    Posts: 5,319

    gene-koning
    Member

    I don't do drag racing, but have been (in the past) pretty involved with circle track racing. There, each track had its own rule book. How and by whom the existing rule book was interpreted was almost as important as how the track enforced its rule book.
    In circle track racing, the rule books were often interpreted as either telling you what you could do to/with your car, or it was interpreted as telling you what you couldn't do to/with your car. Those two interpretations could be a pretty long ways apart. From there it mattered if the track considered the rule book as suggestions (not enforced very much), or requirements (followed with reinforcement). At some tracks, the level of enforcement could have been determined by how popular the car owner/driver was, or what fit the tracks desires of the day.
    The standing opinion of any track's rules, pretty much come down to you had to know how the track you raced at viewed and enforced their rule book.
     
  15. TexasHardcore
    Joined: May 30, 2003
    Posts: 5,540

    TexasHardcore
    Member
    from Austin-ish

  16. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    too late, I already built mine. But it's neat to see how many varieties they have, none of which are exactly what I needed.
     
  17. 1964countrysedan
    Joined: Apr 14, 2011
    Posts: 1,135

    1964countrysedan
    Member
    from Texas

    And I am just here for wheelie videos...

    Thanks again Jim for posting your build and travel threads.

    They are the best!
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2025
  18. snoc653
    Joined: Dec 25, 2023
    Posts: 975

    snoc653
    Member
    from Iowa

    I think Jim should take a week and come watch the corn grow. I have a feeling my project would be done if I had his knowledge and abilities for a week. Of course my chiropractor would feel left out as I get a couple days of work and then I have to visit him. Maybe he could road trip the Cheep just to work the bugs out.
     
  19. Jim, I believe the Lakewood style bolt in bars are still legal. One back brace and an added driver side . No, you don't need a passenger side bar. All that extra stuff has been added over the years for rigidity.
     
  20. Denny, Nope .Not required for 11.49 to 10.0.
    Unit body just has to have welded in floor plates.
     
  21. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    You can bolt the roll bar assembly into the car, if it has 6" square plates on the bottom, and you can put a matching square plate under the floor. Which is not so easy to do on many cars, but probably is possible on this one. I just welded them in. You can't really install/remove it because the downbars all get in the way of moving it, once it's all welded together. And the bars have to be welded together, as far as I can tell.

    roll bar diagram.jpg roll bar text.jpg
     
  22. 41 GMC K-18
    Joined: Jun 27, 2019
    Posts: 4,893

    41 GMC K-18
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Hey @squirrel
    Hey Jim, I really have to hand it to you for going deep into the rules, to illustrate to all concerned about the rules of the roll bar installation.

    It brings to mind, the famous sentencing scene from the old classic movie " Inherit the Wind"
    The tone of the Judges voice " Henry Morgan " says it all!

     
    bobss396 and porkshop like this.
  23. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    thanks, but it's not a deep dive, it's just reading the rule and understanding what it says, and more importantly, what it does not say.
     
  24. General info , for those interested.
    Somewhere in that guide, it mentions padding, where ever the driver could come in contact with the bar, i.e. on the side bar and on the driver side of the main hoop . Also a head rest, but usually a high back bucket seat will suffice.
    Once you have a bar, you'll need a 5 point racing belt, whether or not the ET requires a bar in the first place.
     
    rod1, 41 GMC K-18 and squirrel like this.
  25. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    Padding is only where the helmet can contact the bar, so the side bar doesn't need it.

    I built head rests into the roll bar/cage on the older cars I had with low back seats. This one has high back seats. And it also mentions that you have to bolt the seat back to the lower cross bar, which I did.
     
    dwollam, 41 GMC K-18 and Crosley like this.
  26. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,361

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    @squirrel or any one have a link for
    Pdf file on line for
    Full / Complete
    2025 NHRA R-B
    I looked on line did not find ,
    Over weekend another controversy ,
    From my understanding Rule is No Modifications Allowed to part !!
    But Manufacture made / designed /produced , & part was used they way
    Manufacture intended to be used.
    So No modifications were done.
     
    41 GMC K-18 likes this.
  27. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    dwollam and 41 GMC K-18 like this.
  28. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,361

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    Thanks @squirrel
    I looked for some time , all I seen was where to oder , or 2025
    RULE AMENDMENTS
    0r short versions

    I use duck duck as search engine ,
    It seems to be doing a limited searches ,
    Any one seem to be having limited searching ?
     
  29. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    Anyways, I did some more playing with the speedometer. It had worked right, on one trip into town, the rest of the time it would work sort of for a little while then quit altogether. I played with the wiring to the speed sensor, that didn't help. So I tried another sensor, and it works great. The speedometer is right on, according to the gps. The odometer reads a little slow. I'll see how I like it, might change the drive gear for one less tooth if I think it needs it.

    I also got the computer to see the signal, it displays the "speed" as Hz on the little display. It reads 130 when I'm going 60 mph. I'll see if there's a way to scale it? or make it show up as mph? but that might not be possible with the limited programmability of the computer.

    I also went to the dump again today, because I still haven't put a driveshaft in my old truck. Cheep weighs 3120 with only me in it. So it's just about back to it's original weight, of 2954.
     
  30. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,124

    squirrel
    Member

    Since the speedometer is working, I figured it's time to get the cruise control on too. I had bought a new old stock Dakota Digital branded Rostra Global Cruise for the Checker, and removed it before I sold the car. So it went on Cheep. First try it didn't work, but then I connected the tach signal wire, and it was happy.

    Now I'm looking at adding a sound system, and a compartment behind the seats to hide a little bit of stuff, like a tool box.

    There are a few late night drags in Tucson coming up, I might try to make it to one of them. I need to find some 8" rear wheels and get some 275/60R15 drag radials, first.

    I also bought a set of used 3.27 gears for the 8.8, I might try to get them in over the next week or so.

    And wonder of wonders, look who ended up going for a little ride.

    janet.jpg

    she thought it was pretty civilized compared to Plan II.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.