Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Stroking 289 - Budget Build

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by MUNCIE, Feb 24, 2024.

Tags:
  1. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Thank you sir, I will check them out
     
  2. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Yes sir, that is exactly what I did for the rotating ***embly. Just trying to determine what route to go with the heads...
     
  3. Unkl Ian
    Joined: Mar 29, 2001
    Posts: 13,509

    Unkl Ian

    This is common.
     
  4. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

  5. 2OLD2FAST
    Joined: Feb 3, 2010
    Posts: 6,062

    2OLD2FAST
    Member
    from illinois

    Budget36 likes this.
  6. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Yes sir, I just called them. It refers the OD of the spring, roller/hyd flat tap cam/ and max lift. The -1.250 are set up for hyd flat tap cam and max lift .510 vs. the -1.437 are set up for a roller cam and have a max lift of .650.

    Since I have never had a set of aluminum heads can I run the old style finned valve (cal) covers or would they have to be the newer Ford version(s). I really want to keep the block looking like it was built back in the 60's. Have a reworked OEM distributor and a Pertonix that looks like it is a points distributor.
    Thanks,
    Mark
     
  7. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,331

    Budget36
    Member

    Place your VC on a head, bolts line up? Have proper clearance?
    On my kids engine, due to CB VCs, I had to used narrow body roller rockers. Stamped steel would have been used, but seems I’m a glutton for spending money;)
     
    Outback and MUNCIE like this.
  8. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Outback, Budget36 and loudbang like this.
  9. birdman1
    Joined: Dec 6, 2012
    Posts: 1,686

    birdman1
    Member

    I put 351c pistons, 302 rods, 302 crank. Cleveland heads ,2v is fine, an aftermarket boss 302 intake and headers for a Cleveland. Use a original grind boss302 cam and you will have a nice, quick street engine
     
    deathrowdave and MUNCIE like this.
  10. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,608

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    MUNCIE likes this.
  11. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Yes I got it back about 4 months ago and according to them I should be getting the re-worked heads back this week fingers crossed. I'm not gonna run the high rise, sticking with a dual plane for now. Trying to piece everything together. For my cam if I stick with the C4 going to need a 2500 or a tad higher stall and 3.90 or 4.11 gears. I have everything to convert to a 4 speed with the exception of the transmission. I would love to have a toploader in there.
    Question though for those who would know, with any standard trans would a camshaft with .500 and above lift present any street driving issues.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2025
  12. 2OLD2FAST
    Joined: Feb 3, 2010
    Posts: 6,062

    2OLD2FAST
    Member
    from illinois

    When you have a clutch , a finicky engine is far easier to control . I think the other cam numbers mean far more to a lack of smoothness than the lift .
     
    MUNCIE likes this.
  13. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Heads are in, didn't break the bank but definitely got upgraded a little...Need to decide on a set of roller tip rockers and need to order a ARP bolt set and fel pro gasket kit.
    IMG_7227.jpg IMG_7226.jpg
     
    Outback, Budget36 and Toms Dogs like this.
  14. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,488

    finn
    Member

    289 and 302 pistons have the same compression height/ pin location but the original 289 pistons had a longer skirt that interferes with the rod shank if you try to ***emble them into a longer stroke 302 crank with the longer 302 rod.

    At least that’s the case with the old TRW/ Sealed Power Speed Pro forged pistons. I have a set of high compression 289/hipo pistons on the shelf that wouldn’t clear the rod when I tried using them in a build using a Boss 302 crank and 302 rods many years ago. All the other critical dimensions check the same, except for skirt length.

    I suppose the current aftermarket pistons may have commonized on the short skirt design for both the 289 and 302 rod and crank combinations, though.
     
  15. patsurf
    Joined: Jan 18, 2018
    Posts: 2,552

    patsurf

    shorten them equally!
     
    finn and seb fontana like this.
  16. Flatrod17
    Joined: Apr 25, 2017
    Posts: 698

    Flatrod17
    Member

    I have run into pistons skirts hitting the crank with different combinations, fortunately it was in mock up. So, I shorten the skirts to clear, then balanced it all. It wasn't a lot to take off. All was good with that engine.
     
    MUNCIE and patsurf like this.
  17. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Does anyone know how to identify/measure what screw in stud size I have on my heads. I want to order the correct rocker arms. Going with the "rail type" rocker arm, my heads have the slotted holes for the push rods.
     
  18. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    I forgot I had a dial caliper and I just measured several of my screw in studs. Basically I came up with .375 so they are 3/8's. My cam calls for 1.6:1 rocker ratio. Leaning towards these...
    https://www.compcams.com/magnum-roller-rocker-arms-ford-3-8-stud-1-6-ratio-1.html
     
  19. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 4,036

    oldiron 440
    Member

    If I remember correctly the 302 has longer cylinders, that is longer at the bottom. This was to support the bottom of the pistons at bdc.
     
    MUNCIE likes this.
  20. Flatrod17
    Joined: Apr 25, 2017
    Posts: 698

    Flatrod17
    Member

    Looking at your heads I don't think you can use rail rockers. They are early 289 heads made to use conventional rockers. The rail rocker heads had longer tip on the valves to align the rockers. If you are able to use rail rockers do not try to use them with the slot in the head. Heads with slots or guide plates need harden push rods. Heads that have the longer tip valves use rail rockers, and they can use soft push rods, but need large round holes in the head.
    3/8 is the standard size stud and 1.6 is the stock rocker ratio.
     
  21. ^^^^ This. If you don't have the longer valves, the rail rockers can hit the valve spring retainers instead of the valve. Leading to the loss of a keeper and dropping a valve down into the cylinder. AMHIK....
     
    MUNCIE likes this.
  22. F-ONE
    Joined: Mar 27, 2008
    Posts: 3,700

    F-ONE
    Member
    from Alabama

    You are correct!
    The heads shown in the photo are early '63-65 heads. They have the tight slots and are pushrod located.
    He does not need rail rockers.
    He needs early conventional rockers.
    He needs hardened push rods.
    He does not need guide plates as the heads have cast in slots.

    I also think he needs a cam with less than .500 lift.
     
    MUNCIE likes this.
  23. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,201

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Do not need hardened push rods with cast iron heads with slots last I new. You should have screw in rocker studs though, which you have. Check rocker clearance to stud hex, if the boss was not milled down there will be an issue.
     
    MUNCIE and deathrowdave like this.
  24. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,488

    finn
    Member

    In my case they were “sample” pistons from my Sealed Power sales rep.

    I replaced them with hypereutectic “Samples” from the Zollner Chief Engineer.

    Still have the Sealed power pistons on the shelf in the original box.

    Pretty sure that while shortening the skirt might work, the profile of the pistons with a short factory skirt would be different than a piston with a long factory skirt.

    Works and works correctly are two different things.
     
    Beanscoot likes this.
  25. patsurf
    Joined: Jan 18, 2018
    Posts: 2,552

    patsurf

    what would be the 'visible' difference?only thing i could even think of would be where lands are located,but would kind of go against 'm*** production'
     
  26. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,488

    finn
    Member

    Skirts extend lower on the piston barrel on the 289 pistons. They contact the rod shank if you try to turn the engine over if ***embled with the longer stroke longer rod 302 parts.

    Generally that’s not one of the specifications published by the manufacturer. They give you pin bore to crown dimensions, ring locations, etc, but not skirt length.
    This is all from my “way back” memory.

    Like I said, though, there’s no reason current design pistons wouldn’t have addressed this. In my case, I was using pistons catalogued for a 289 specifically. I suspect 302 pistons are all you can get now, and they will be backwards compatible to replace the old 289 pistons.

    I probably shouldn’t even have brought this up, but it’s one of the little details / idiosyncrasies that I have run into.
     
    Outback and patsurf like this.
  27. deathrowdave
    Joined: May 27, 2014
    Posts: 5,046

    deathrowdave
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from NKy

    I don’t touch early blocks anymore . The rollers are my go to for SBF builds .
     
    MUNCIE likes this.
  28. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Here are some of the details for my build and the kit I purchased for the valve train. We tested the valve springs with the valves they had originally ordered. I don't remember the readings but they were pretty stiff.
    The machine shop was worried I might wipe out a lobe and recommended and a different valve with a longer stem. So there was a little of a delay but when I picked the heads I asked them did they install the valves with the longer stem and they told me yes.
    I read up a little on the rocker arm subject and don't want to go full roller, I decided that conventional should be adequate enough but I am seriously thinking about upgrading the studs to 7/16th and calling it a day on the heads.

    Isky cam and lifter kit Details -

    • RPM-Range 2500-6800
    • 1.6:1 Rocker Ratio
    • Grind No./Type 280-Mega Hydraulic
    • Lopey Idle
    • 2500 Stall
    • 9.5-10.5:1 Compression
    • 3.90-4.11 Axle Ratio
    • Up To 780 CFM Carb
    • Valve Lift Int/Ext. 0.517
    • Valve Lash Hot Int/Ext. 0.000
    • ADV Duration Int/Ext. 280
    • 0.050 Duration Int/Ext. 232
    • Lobe Center 108
    Valve Train Items -
    • Hardened pushrods (Part No. 393-HG)
    • Poly Locks 3/8
    • Valve Springs (Part No. 6005)
    • Shims
    • Retainers and Keepers (Part No. 507ST)
    Isky (1).jpg
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2025
    Outback likes this.
  29. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    :eek::eek:
     
  30. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Bosses aren't milled down.
    IMG_7233.jpg IMG_7234.jpg
     
    Outback likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.