Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Early olds 303 rod bearings

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Troubadour85, Sep 29, 2025.

  1. Troubadour85
    Joined: Mar 3, 2022
    Posts: 140

    Troubadour85
    Member
    from Dayton, OH

    I've dug deep into the Olds threads and having a hard time finding the answer on Olds rod bearings. I am building a '49 303 and having everything machined right now. According to Egge and Kantner the bearings for the early Olds are different (oil hole) and I cant find a .010 rod bearing anywhere. Is the later 303 (53 up I believe) a suitable sub or different all together? Thanks!
     
  2. vtwhead
    Joined: Oct 20, 2008
    Posts: 5,297

    vtwhead
    Member

    you are pretty close to Ross Racing so i would ask him for advice or drive the 4 hrs ? and talk to him. Tony knows his Olds engines. @GOATROPER02 on here if you pm him
     
  3. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,209

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

  4. Paul
    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 16,938

    Paul
    Editor

    Yes, I see the '49 and '50 303s listed as: (W/7/32" oil hole)
    it's been far too long since I put one of those years together so I can't help much there.
    was the hole eliminated?

    I'm curious too

    PXL_20251002_164327238~2.jpg
     
  5. ClayMart
    Joined: Oct 26, 2007
    Posts: 7,751

    ClayMart
    Member

    According to the footnotes it looks like the difference may have had to do with how the wrist pins were oiled. But the footnotes aren't completely readable. Did the early rods use a floating wrist pin and the later rods were press fit? :confused:
     
  6. 42merc
    Joined: Dec 19, 2010
    Posts: 976

    42merc
    Member

    Same with me on early Olds.
    Seem to think the "tangs" were opposite.?
     
  7. chicken
    Joined: Aug 15, 2004
    Posts: 672

    chicken
    Member
    from Kansas

    If the tangs line up and the bearings measure the same, drilling the oil hole will work fine. Cutting new tangs in the rods isn't a big deal either if necessary.
     
  8. Paul
    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 16,938

    Paul
    Editor


    PXL_20251002_172739968~2.jpg
     
  9. chicken
    Joined: Aug 15, 2004
    Posts: 672

    chicken
    Member
    from Kansas

    I'd bet that triangle denoted footnote is telling us that the tangs are different.
     
  10. saltracer219
    Joined: Sep 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,168

    saltracer219
    Member

    The 49 rods were rifle drilled for pin oiling hence the oil hole in the upper rod bearing shell. Olds did away with that in 1950 and up engines. The 49 rods are considered weaker than the 50 up rods. All 49-64 Olds engines had bushed rods with full floating wrist pins. IMOP you could either ignore the upper oiling hole or just carefully drill and deburr the upper bearing shell for oiling.
     
    AccurateMike and Paul like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.