Register now to get rid of these ads!

Featured Hot Rods Heavy Duty truck 283 differences?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by KCTA Chris, Nov 24, 2025 at 11:38 AM.

  1. KCTA Chris
    Joined: Jan 16, 2002
    Posts: 482

    KCTA Chris
    Member

    My son has taken the glorious first step toward building his own traditional hot rod. He ran out and bought an engine without consulting his old dad, when he showed up with a very rough-looking 283, I was sure someone had scammed him. But once we started cleaning it up the boy did good, it's worn but still standard bore—so it should clean up and build nicely.

    Question: this 283 was originally green? Casting code is 58-62 and it came from a truck. A little research says its a Taskmaster 283 - Heavy Duty. I cant find any info other than the heads were different (no worry I have a fresh pair of power packs) bearings and balanced. Found a comment about the blocks being thicker?
    Anyone know about these?
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2025 at 12:17 PM
  2. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 20,247

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

  3. Sounds like the kid did good
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  4. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,920

    squirrel
    Member

    Post the codes stamped on top of the block, in front of the p*** side head. Then we'll know what size truck it came from. Post the casting date code, which is on the back of the block, smaller letter/numbers in the same area as the casting number, usually on the other side. The truck parts books list all of these, I have the books, and they're not on the internet that I'm aware of.

    I the parts books also list every part of the engines, that were used in cars and trucks, so you can compare what was different, and what was the same.
     
  5. KCTA Chris
    Joined: Jan 16, 2002
    Posts: 482

    KCTA Chris
    Member

    Thanks - Same specs as a Taskmaster - maybe the green paint makes it tougher? lol
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  6. KCTA Chris
    Joined: Jan 16, 2002
    Posts: 482

    KCTA Chris
    Member

    Here's what I have with my. casting 3756519 I think thats 58-62? I'll need to dig for the other numbers
    The front (suffix code?) is F42CN - I'm lost on that one Screenshot 2025-11-24 at 11.53.10 AM.png
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  7. Not sure on that particular 283 but the 350s we messed with in larger trucks had different intake. The thermostat housing and byp*** was different. The 2bbls used large base carbs.
    They were basically a slightly lower compression 350 with extra cooling and a heavier or different dampener set up
    The cranks were forged.
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  8. 58-62 block.
    Might be a good 301 candidate:)
     
  9. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,920

    squirrel
    Member

    F 420 N

    Flint, April 20th ***embly date, suffix N

    Three digit date codes were used until some time in the late 50s, when they added a leading zero, such as F0420N.

    The truck book lists the N suffix for the 5000 (later L50) series trucks, 1957-61.

    Since the casting is listed as 58-61, you could check to see if it has side mount holes, to rule out it being from 57. The casting date will tell you for sure, though, what year it is.

    I'll go look in the shop to see if the other manual lists specs for them.
     
  10. KCTA Chris
    Joined: Jan 16, 2002
    Posts: 482

    KCTA Chris
    Member

    Thanks for the quick info! Id does have side mounts - tonight I'll get some more numbers.
     
    Tickety Boo and chryslerfan55 like this.
  11. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,920

    squirrel
    Member

    Here's the casting date code on a 57 block, it's near the top of the bellhousing area, opposite side from the casting number. (yeah, I have a 57 block on my engine stand today)

    283 date code.jpg 283 date code 2.jpg

    Here are the specs for the truck 283, both LD and HD. I think LD was used up to the 1 ton, and HD was 1.5 ton and larger.

    58 truck engine specs1.jpg 58 truck engine specs2.jpg 58 truck engine specs3.jpg 58 truck engine specs4.jpg

    and here are for the 1958 car engine

    58 car engine specs1.jpg 58 car engine specs2.jpg 58 car engine specs3.jpg 58 car engine specs4.jpg

    This is from the brochure for 1959 80 series trucks, explaining some of the differences with the heavy duty engine. I don't know if this applies to the 50s series, I don't have that brochure, unfortunately.

    80 series engien brochure.jpg
     
  12. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,920

    squirrel
    Member

    One reason the date of the engine might matter, is that the rear main seal design changed around 1959. Earlier engines used a rope seal, that fit into a slot. Later engines use a rubber seal, that fits over a ridge. There is a rubber seal available to replace the rope seal, but it's a relatively hard to find part, I think Best Gaskets sells them.

    Also, during 1959, the valve covers and heads changed from having staggered bolt pattern, to straight across.
     
  13. KCTA Chris
    Joined: Jan 16, 2002
    Posts: 482

    KCTA Chris
    Member

    Squirrel this is great info - not seeing a lot of difference other than the compression between the LT and HD.
     
  14. Dave G in Gansevoort
    Joined: Mar 28, 2019
    Posts: 3,743

    Dave G in Gansevoort
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    Good information about the seals. Thanks squirrel. I’ve got a 58 that will probably need new seals.
     
    RodStRace and porkshop like this.
  15. Mimilan
    Joined: Jun 13, 2019
    Posts: 1,255

    Mimilan
    Member

    Best Gasket make a seal that replaces the rope seal
    3711X is the part number for early 265-283's

    upload_2025-11-29_17-51-11.png
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2025 at 10:51 PM
  16. RICH B
    Joined: Feb 7, 2007
    Posts: 5,944

    RICH B
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    283 truck motor my kid picked up had a hub on the crank snout instead of a damper.
     
    4274SPEED, bchctybob and Algoma56 like this.
  17. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,920

    squirrel
    Member

    pretty common for early 283s to have a hub and not a real damper.
     
    RodStRace, 4274SPEED, Tim and 3 others like this.
  18. lcfman
    Joined: Sep 1, 2009
    Posts: 456

    lcfman
    Member
    from tn

    Chevrolet used Buick engines for their big trucks 55-57 and in 58-61 they used the 348.
     
    vtx1800 likes this.
  19. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,967

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    283 was available up through the 8000 series in 58
    235 through the 4000 series
    261 6000 series
    348 not listed in trucks for 58 1958-Chevrolet-Truck.pdf It shows as an option in 59.
     

    Attached Files:

    RodStRace and bchctybob like this.
  20. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,967

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Toms Dogs and RodStRace like this.
  21. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,920

    squirrel
    Member

    well, if you want to get picky about it....

    56tr.jpg 57tr.jpg 59tr.jpg 60tr.jpg
     
  22. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,387

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    It would probably turn the kid into a 1/4 mile speed addict but the only numbers that really matter are 12.5/1, 301/4 speed.
     
  23. Taboo56Chevy
    Joined: May 21, 2018
    Posts: 2,044

    Taboo56Chevy
    Member

    The Green paint was most likely as super simple easy to spot identifier as the engine plant to know what engines were for the bigger truck line vs the orange of a p***enger/light duty truck. In the trunk load of 348/409 stuff I got, the 409 oil pan still had the original green paint peeking through under the red that it had been resprayed at some point.

    Yeah, or if you can score a set of good 1.94 camel humps, as the machine shop cost if you have to build any set of heads will be roughly the same between a camel hump or a powerpack, might as well get the better core to start with.

    Then with a simple C3B intake and like the good ol 097 Duntov or a L79 cam for a good simple traditional small block.
     
    -Brent-, Toms Dogs, alanp561 and 2 others like this.
  24. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,387

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon



    ^^^^^^^^What he said^^^^^^^^^
     
  25. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 5,617

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Along with correct wheel weights:cool:
     
    Hollywood-East and winduptoy like this.
  26. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 8,757

    RodStRace
    Member

    @squirrel Amazing info! Thanks for all your knowledge and sharing!
    @KCTA Chris , sounds like the kid done good! You might send him out for another, he seems to have the gift.
    Not my place to tell him or you what to do, but I think it would be cool to match up and repaint it the original Green. Gives him a cool back story when the car is done and at the local cruise or show. Sure beats the "yeah, it's a 'vette motor" tale.
     
    -Brent- and NoSurf like this.
  27. KCTA Chris
    Joined: Jan 16, 2002
    Posts: 482

    KCTA Chris
    Member

    Found the other number: D189
    (1 could be a 7?) Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 8.59.48 AM.png
     
    milwscruffy and Toms Dogs like this.
  28. KCTA Chris
    Joined: Jan 16, 2002
    Posts: 482

    KCTA Chris
    Member

    He's a good kid so glad to see lady luck going his way.
    Could be different being green maybe he will.
    Unfortunately a low power truck engine doesn't sound as cool as a vette - but bored out with some compression is a different story! lol
     
    winduptoy and Toms Dogs like this.
  29. Toms Dogs
    Joined: Dec 16, 2005
    Posts: 1,078

    Toms Dogs
    Member
    from NJ

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.