Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 1954 Chevy 210 Rear Suspension Woes

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by mike1951, Dec 8, 2025.

  1. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    Went to install new shocks on my 54 Chevy. Should have been a 30 min job..
    The car was swapped by a PO with a 55-57 rear end. Common swap. Shock mounting plates were a bit mangled so I ordered replacements. for a 55...could not for the life of me find ones for a 54.
    First: The new shock mounting plates do not have the same geometry as the old ones.
    Not the biggest problem. I can re use the old ones.
    Second: p***enger side fits correctly. Shock lines up pretty good. Driver side is wonky. Shock is a bit bent and the geometry for the mount is not correct. Looks like it was either a garbage install or bent at some point.

    Questioner the group is....What shock mounting plate did they put on here and where can I find a replacement? Is it one of the generic ones I see on mail order auto parts places?

    In the first photo you can see the difference in the two plates. In the second...this was the closest I could get to mounting with quite a bit of tension on the bolt... I don't want to run it like that. Would damage the shock I am sure. IMG_2822.jpg IMG_2837.jpg IMG_2821.jpg IMG_2814.jpg
     
  2. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,009

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'd take the shock stud out and straighten the one that came on it. You will have to get the big hammer out but it looks like it can be done pretty simply.
     
  3. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    I'll attack it that way. May have to grind some of that mess off as well. I got no clue what they did up in there.
    re. IMG_2838.jpg
     
  4. Is the rear end in the car square?

    The first thing I would suggest is measuring the wheel base left and right.

    I don’t know if it would help in this situation but this is way oval track cars with rear leaf springs run an adjustable lowering block on one side, because how square you build the ch***is it is never perfect and the adjustment allows you to get things perfectly dialed in.


    If you run it on the left on an oval track cars you can shorten the wheel base on the left and help with cornering.


    https://www.speedwaymotors.com/Spee...MIm73I59ywkQMVrjcIBR0GfwJlEAQYASABEgIC5fD_BwE

    IMG_0119.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2025
    X-cpe likes this.
  5. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    Great question. I will throw a tape measure on it. Drives pretty nice, (I have had it up to about 70) but it could be off.
     
  6. I added to my post.
     
  7. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    That is really cool and helpful. Thank you.
     
  8. F-ONE
    Joined: Mar 27, 2008
    Posts: 3,697

    F-ONE
    Member
    from Alabama

    I wonder if the spring packs are original 1954.

    1954 was the last year for the torque tube. It’s my understanding that Torque Tube springs are not as strong as conventional open drive spring packs.

    Also the axle location is slightly different in a torque tube car.

    I wonder if this is the root cause of your problem?
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  9. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    Great question. They may be original. I know the bump stops do not make adequate contact with the axle.
    I was able to pull the pin and align better, but the exhaust is still too close for my liking. When I checked travel the pipe rubs on the shock body a bit. Explains why driver side shock is as rough as it is.
    I will be dimpling the exhaust a bit this weekend. It is 2.5 inch so I am not too worried about flow being restricted.
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2025 at 11:06 AM
  10. Originally shocks had their own separate plate that clamped to the spring. Should not be too hard to find for a 54 and should still work with the swapped rear end. Im still using them on my open drive swapped 53.
     
  11. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    I will look for that. Got a pic?
    I'm going through all the issues with taking a someone's weekend toy and making it a daily driver.
     
  12. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,524

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Your axle is in the wrong place.
     
  13. Nothing handy. I'll see if I can find one
     
    mike1951 likes this.
  14. Id snap one of the ones on my car. But that'd require crawling on the ground in the cold lol
     
    mike1951 likes this.
  15. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    I understand. I am chipping away at this every night after work in the driveway. Garage is taken with an OT project for my son.
     
  16. It's basically just a piece of shallow 1.5" channel with the shock stud on one end. And it clamps to the spring with a square u bolt just ahead of the axle. I honestly need to get a shorter I bolt for the p***enger side
     
  17. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 37,535

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    yes, if you are using the stock springs and did not use a lowering block with an offset alignment hole your rear axle is 1.5" too far forward. Let us see a picture of the car straight from the side
     
  18. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    That is the best one I have at the moment. The axle sits behind the bump stop currently. I'll take a photo directly from the side after work. IMG_2290.jpg
     
  19. Wheel honestly looks centered. When mounting an open axle on stock pin it moves wheel enough you can't miss the awkwardness.
     
  20. On my 53 and 54 I redrilled my perches
     
  21. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 37,535

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    if you look at this picture it looks like the axle tube is centered on the locating bolt. ***uming these are stock springs then the axle has to be too far forward 53rr.jpg
     
  22. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    Dropping the pins in correctly took a bit of finesse. It drives straight. I get bump steer which I'd like to address, but I have had it at highway speeds and she purrs right along. I'm not fighting the wheel or having issues staying in lane. When I hit the bakes it does not pull.


     
  23. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    Hmmmm If I pull the axle back more...the exhaust will prevent mounting the shocks.


     
  24. 325w
    Joined: Feb 18, 2008
    Posts: 6,502

    325w
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    55 shock plate work fine. Redrill the axle pad and you’re good. You side view shows it
     
  25. Side question. Are the old plates wider than the new ones?
     
  26. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    Yes. Probably about 1.5-2 inches. IMG_2814.jpg
     
  27. Do the u bolts sit against the current springs?
     
  28. mike1951
    Joined: Jul 15, 2007
    Posts: 750

    mike1951
    Member
    from Colorado

    They do with the new plates but not as flush on the older ones. IMG_2818.jpg
     
  29. I wanna say those look like aftermarket or at least not stock springs. So perch pin is likely centered
     
    Baumi and Moriarity like this.
  30. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 37,535

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    side picture of the car will tell the tale
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.