Register now to get rid of these ads!

Featured Technical Original 1932 Ford frame repair

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by HaroldDegand, Dec 12, 2025.

  1. Hi. I repair an original 32 frame which had a collision. I need some information from jig owners or anyone could help.

    Is there some difference between frames ?
    On the diagram, at the front cross member, I should have 4’’ 7/8 between the bottom of the rail and the baseline. Mine has minder than that. About 1in minder.

    Thanks !

    IMG_4100.jpeg
     
    HemiDeuce and oliver westlund like this.
  2. Mart
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 5,015

    Mart
    Member

    Does minder =less?
    All frames should be the same. Looking at the dimensions the height at the top of the rails near the front crossmember should be 1-1/2 inches above the top of the rails in the centre section.
     
    oliver westlund likes this.
  3. Yes Mart sorry. I ment less
     
    oliver westlund and Just Gary like this.
  4. I guess its bent
    I’ve got one with the left rail probably 3-4 inches up with a buckle at the cowl
    As soon as we get all the ugly boxing plates removed we will pull it down.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2025
  5. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,666

    Fordors
    Member

  6. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 20,739

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    I would note that it shows that measurement with the belly of the rail “flat” on the ground and the frame horns hanging in the air. I could see sitting it so the horns touch the ground and that would skew that dimension.
     
  7. The rear horns are 2 1/4
    The front left is 2 1/8 and the right side is about 2 3/8 in.
    The frame is at my workshop, I can only exctly check it on monday.

    IMG_4079.jpeg

    IMG_4080.jpeg

    IMG_4083.jpeg IMG_4084.jpeg IMG_4059.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2025
    hfh, vtx1800, Kiwi 4d and 7 others like this.
  8. That’s a nice bench

    used em a few times

    would be super EZ to clamp down on that
     
  9. RockyMtnWay
    Joined: Jan 6, 2015
    Posts: 720

    RockyMtnWay
    Member

    When I look at that schematic I might wonder if the 4 7/8 is the bottom of the frame or the spring mount height on the bottom of the crossmember.
     
  10. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,962

    alchemy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Harold, the tips of the front horns are higher than standard, but the middle of the arch is lower? That sounds like any bends in the area should be rather extreme, and visible to the eye. Unless the diagram is incorrect as you suspect.
     
  11. TCTND
    Joined: Dec 27, 2019
    Posts: 775

    TCTND
    Member

    I agree. The way the drawing is laid out suggests that is the dimension to the crossmember, not the frame rail.
     
  12. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,577

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    The crossmember is its own elevation drawing. Math is required to arrive to it’s own distance from lowest horizontal reference line up.
     
  13. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,154

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'd say you need for Krylon32 to see the thread and add his input. He is one of the Hamb 32 Ford Ch***is gurus.
     
  14. banjorear
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 4,864

    banjorear
    Member

    I have a copy of the original blue print. Let me see if I can find it to confirm the diagram mentioned is correct. Give me a little bit
     
  15. NoSurf
    Joined: Jul 26, 2002
    Posts: 4,920

    NoSurf
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  16. I asked Krylon32 to help but he said he can’t this time
     
    NoSurf likes this.
  17. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,154

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I was figuring that he might see something that was not quite right or have a better way of checking.
     
  18. lamaison
    Joined: Oct 21, 2006
    Posts: 147

    lamaison
    Member
    from Canada

    Here's one put out by Wescott's for what it's worth.

    - Frame.jpg
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2025
    HemiDeuce likes this.
  19. Corn Fed
    Joined: May 16, 2002
    Posts: 3,447

    Corn Fed
    Member

    When I built my 32 specific frame jig I took measurements from 3 different original frames and compared them to both the Wescott and Cruisin Products drawings. Very few agreed dead nuts. I went with kind of the average, leaning more towards what I got off my frames since I don't know how many frames the drawing creators used.
    Right now I have a pair of new ASC rails in there. The measurement from the bottom of the rails to the center of the front spreader bar bolt is 3 5/8" which almost matches your RH frame horn picture.
    Is that exactly what Henry's designers wanted....IDK. But it's what mine measures.
     
    NoSurf likes this.
  20. Ok. I took better measurement.

    The kick up on the right side measure 4 7/8 as it should.
    The left one is 4 5/8.

    at the bottom of the left horn, I have 2 1/8
    The right one 2 1/2.
     
  21. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 4,339

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    Another Blue plant drawing I use but I still think it does not help you with the horn height



    IMG_4592.png
     
  22. We put the body on the frame.
    It’s a swedish steel roadster.
    Another issue is the giant (about 2 in) gap between the top of the tank and the bottom of the body.
    I believe, I’ll heat and bend the frame in the kick up area.
    The frame will not be in the spec anymore but matching the body.
    Just worried about the rear crossmember angle.
     

    Attached Files:

    Deutscher likes this.
  23. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 4,339

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    @HaroldDegand
    Rear body mount / subframe Does Not set flat on frame,
    There supposed to be a gap,
    That rear body mount bolt is a adjustment for doors
     
  24. 3blapcam
    Joined: Jul 15, 2004
    Posts: 643

    3blapcam
    Member

    PXL_20250901_235414142[1].jpg

    I'd say your gap is a bit much. Granted, I don't know anything about Swedish roadsters...

    3blap.
     
    hfh and 05snopro440 like this.
  25. Happydaze
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 2,429

    Happydaze
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'm not seeing heating and bending the frame to close that gap a little is going to work. I can see a small pie cut working though. There's a challenge for ya', prove me wrong with your fancy alignment jig!!

    Chris
     
    3blapcam likes this.
  26. 3blapcam
    Joined: Jul 15, 2004
    Posts: 643

    3blapcam
    Member

    The frame and frame rails look fine on the frame table.

    Is this roadster body an aftermarket body? If so, I think I would add a spacer under the tank mounting surface and cut the body to tank gap in half, at least.

    3blap.
     
  27. marfen
    Joined: Aug 14, 2009
    Posts: 487

    marfen
    Member
    from sask

    Don't forget room for the gas sender and fuel pickup when positioning body over gas tank. What 19Eddy30 said is very important. Good to see you are using a frame machine. You'll get it right on that.
     
  28. GuyW
    Joined: Feb 23, 2007
    Posts: 865

    GuyW
    Member

    The top of the deuce frame has a "belly", yes? (hence the need for a wood spacer when putting an A body on it).

    Does the bottom also have a belly??
     
  29. SPEC
    Joined: Feb 1, 2021
    Posts: 949

    SPEC
    Member

    Hi Mart I haven't seen you on the Hamb in a long time.
    Spec.
     
    Ziggster likes this.
  30. NealinCA
    Joined: Dec 12, 2001
    Posts: 3,566

    NealinCA
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.