Register now to get rid of these ads!

‘60’s Monster Car T-Bucket Build

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by JReece, Dec 11, 2025.

  1. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Installed some flush mount ‘59 Caddy style taillights.
    IMG_1450.jpeg IMG_1458.jpeg IMG_1461.jpeg IMG_1462.jpeg IMG_1463.jpeg
     
    shanejgass and Bill Fonzarelli like this.
  2. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Repainted the engine and added the “Toxici-T!” cowl logos.

    IMG_1467.jpeg IMG_1494.jpeg IMG_1796.jpeg IMG_1797.jpeg IMG_1526.jpeg
     
  3. Lookin' real good @JReece I really like the tailites,very:cool:!!
     
    JReece likes this.
  4. nrgwizard
    Joined: Aug 18, 2006
    Posts: 3,054

    nrgwizard
    Member
    from Minn. uSA

    Hey, JR;
    You mentioned rear tires n wheels. Proportion is *everything*. Early 60's -> maybe mid 70's, a tall rear tire is needed - whether a skinny bias 50's-type, or a wider type. The one that looks so good is the 10"x16" 60's era "Top Fueler" sized slick. The look desired was the new-for-then AA/FA, for the street. But where to find a near-identical-sized/proportioned-street-tire? IDK... ;( . The 8.5" & 9" wide slicks were also popular, but **** for the street. Again, where do you find the correct proportioned tire. IDK. But I do know, short wide rear tires look stupid in T's & most other fenderless rods. Proportion, again. If you find the correct tire(s) these days, please post. There use to be some light truck tires in the 3** size by BFGoodrich(???). but afaik, those are also long-gone.
    As for the wide fronts, I do like them, but they kinda need to be almost steamrollers to work properly. Yrs ago, at Peoria nats, & iirc, the 1st Nats at Mn fairgrounds, there was a green, hemi-powered T that was super low, fatties all around; that just rocked. :).
    FWIW.
    Marcus...
     
    JReece likes this.
  5. Enjoyed your video post more when you get a chance.
     
    JReece likes this.
  6. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Thanks man!
     
  7. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Yea man, I’m looking at a few different things and researching different tires. I’m also working on a few sponsorships for the car.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  8. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Latest Video!

    Did some testing with the front suspension.

     
    RodStRace likes this.
  9. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Currently, but soon to change
    IMG_1760.jpeg IMG_1764.jpeg IMG_1765.jpeg
     
    shanejgass likes this.
  10. hotrodjack33
    Joined: Aug 19, 2019
    Posts: 4,984

    hotrodjack33
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    What do you mean by sponsors?
    I'm confused.
     
    JReece and SS327 like this.
  11. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    By sponsors, I am referring to sponsorship agreements with companies that provide me with products for my YouTube channel, which I then feature in installation videos on my car.
     
    hotrodjack33 and RodStRace like this.
  12. hotrodjack33
    Joined: Aug 19, 2019
    Posts: 4,984

    hotrodjack33
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Thanks for the explanation JR.
    It never crossed my mind that was a possibility...guess this dinosaur isn't as smart as he thought. LOL.
     
    JReece and SS327 like this.
  13. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    So, what we are really doing with the front end.

    From measurements it looks to be a Model A spring on a 37-41 axle. So I’ve ordered the correct shackles and that spring should fit perfectly on my dropped Model A axle.

    Current measurements:
    - Leaf spring eye to eye 32.75” (should be a 31.25” that’s currently stretched)
    - Shackle length 3.125” on the car, way too long
    - Perch bosses on the car are 39” minus 5” would be need a 34” spring.

    So, with the Model A axle:
    - 31.25” spring
    - New 1.5” shackles
    - Perch bosses are 36.25” minus 5” is 31.25” spring.

    $40 shackles is much better than buying a whole new spring, and I can add leaves back and still be lower from the drop axle.

    IMG_1904.jpeg
     
  14. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Latest Video!

    Big Wheel Reveal! - '23 T Bucket - "Toxici-T!"
     
    RodStRace and hotrodjack33 like this.
  15. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

  16. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Little sneak peek from the next video with the fully lowered suspension.

    IMG_2170.jpeg IMG_2141.jpeg IMG_2143.jpeg
     
    RodStRace and hotrodjack33 like this.
  17. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Definitely looking more mid-‘60s now!
     
    RodStRace likes this.
  18. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

  19. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Dropped Model A Axle Install - '23 T Bucket - "Toxici-T!"
     
  20. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Looking so much better now.

    6D97DEF3-996A-4783-A2F4-66FB5EFC361F.jpeg IMG_2196.jpeg IMG_2195.png IMG_2197.jpeg IMG_2231.jpeg IMG_2230.jpeg
     
    RodStRace and Hutkikz like this.
  21. Hutkikz
    Joined: Oct 15, 2011
    Posts: 211

    Hutkikz
    Member

    Really like this little build its starting to look like a proper '60's ride.
    For your next video I suggest showing your viewers what "Ackerman Angle" is, why it's important and how to correct it.:rolleyes:
     
    JReece likes this.
  22. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Latest video
    Translucent Spark Plug Wires by Nobel Speed Equipment! - '23 T Bucket - "Toxici-T!"
     
  23. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

  24. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    Just want to make everything a little clearer about what I’m trying to accomplish.

    I’ve referenced earlier threads about 60s-style T-Bucket builds and thought hard about stance, parts, and historical context. I’m definitely not trying to make a rat rod or joke car — what I’m after is a believable concept that, in 1961–64, a builder could have put together for the Autorama and cruising.

    This is not a novelty car. It’s a 1960s experimental show rod concept. If someone in ’61–’64 built a “nuclear test survivor” themed rod, it would probably look a lot like this. The more I do to the car, the more it will make sense.

    Think:
    • Ed Roth monster inspired
    • Early 60s show rods
    • Atomic-age influence
    • Weird science
    • Space race paranoia
    • Beatnik culture


    The idea is a Cold War-era experimental hot rod built with a tongue-in-cheek nod to atomic-age optimism and paranoia. Where the monster driver of the car as well as the car itself are both alive and mutating one another.
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2026 at 11:38 AM
  25. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    She’s Running Again! - '23 T Bucket - "Toxici-T!"
     
  26. JReece
    Joined: Oct 6, 2011
    Posts: 526

    JReece
    Member

    I’m finally ready to show you my rendering and tell you some backstory about the character and the car. This isn’t an ordinary, plain Jane, hot rod. I love those cars too, but this is something different. I’ve said from the beginning I’m building a wild ‘60s monster car, and now we’re getting very close. I’ve always liked the side of hot rodding where people weren’t afraid to experiment. The early 1960s were full of cars that mixed traditional hot rod foundations with futuristic ideas, especially during the space race and atomic age.


    Think: ‘60s Autorama Show Card

    Private Roentgen, The Atomic Beatnik

    Once a nobody infantryman ***igned to a cl***ified desert test.

    Too close.
    Too quiet.
    Too bright.

    He survived the blast.
    The blast didn't survive him.

    Mutated by radiation and disillusioned by the system, Private Roentgen rejected orders, authority, and conformity.
    What remained was instinct, rebellion, and a need for speed.

    From surplus parts, borrowed knowledge, and a healthy disregard for safety, he built the machine known as:

    “TOXICI-T!"

    A rolling byproduct of the Atomic Age.
    Unapproved. Unregulated. Unapologetic.

    IMG_2273.jpeg
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.