Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 390 FE Factory Intake

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 57Buick, Jan 20, 2026.

  1. 57Buick
    Joined: Dec 2, 2013
    Posts: 179

    57Buick
    Member
    from Alabama

    I have been stockpiling parts for my 390 upgrade. The engine is out of a 63 Galaxie
    and is currently in stock form. I was really wanting to keep the original factory intake manifold on the motor but a friend says I won't be served too well by that. If I can keep the original factory intake and still get the hp up like I was wanting to I think I will just stay with what I got. Here is a picture of the motor with my new (to me) parts. Anybody got any thoughts on the intake ? I do plan on getting a new cam and having the heads worked on as well.
    Thanks
     

    Attached Files:

    Okie Pete and bchctybob like this.
  2. Usually the most you get out of an aftermarket intake is 10-20 HP if same carb. A lot of times not even that
     
    57Buick likes this.
  3. Bugguts
    Joined: Aug 13, 2011
    Posts: 1,003

    Bugguts
    Member

    You might make a little more horsepower, but you will definitely shave off lots of weight by going with an aftermarket intake. My factory intake about gave me hernia trying to put it on while the motor was in my truck. Took 2 of us to handle it carefully.
     
  4. miker98038
    Joined: Jan 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,609

    miker98038
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    How much hp you looking for?
     
  5. 57Buick
    Joined: Dec 2, 2013
    Posts: 179

    57Buick
    Member
    from Alabama

    Yea it is a big thing :)
     
  6. 57Buick
    Joined: Dec 2, 2013
    Posts: 179

    57Buick
    Member
    from Alabama

    350-400 max
     
  7. deadbeat
    Joined: May 3, 2006
    Posts: 868

    deadbeat
    Member

    First up I would renew my gym membership for moving that cast iron intake, but you know that already. I'm currently in talks with my engine builder as to which direction I go with my FE 390. He seems to think that that sort of horsepower is achievable with some headwork, cam etc. I'm using a vintage Weiand intake on mine. I tend to believe him as he is /has built quite a few down here. One good thing I see with your pics is that you have headers for it. They have got to be better than stock exhaust manifolds. Others may chime in and say I'm talking through my ***. There are some very knowledgeable folks on here when it comes to FE's, I will let you all know when I'm ready to get it done. Cheers and keep us posted
     
  8. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 6,151

    bchctybob
    Member

    The headers are probably the most effective modification for stock-ish FEs. The stock logs that came on garden variety 352-390s are horrible. The optional performance manifolds are a little better.
    I put a bone stock 390 from a 67 T-bird in my ‘53 F100. With my oversized street tires you could punch it from a dead stop and it would just accelerate with no wheel spin. I built a custom 1 7/8 four tube header with a 3”x12” collector for one side and hooked it to my 2 1/2” exhaust system. I needed to have the truck running for work on Monday so I did one whole side each weekend. Leaving work I again punched it and it spun the tires easily. The following weekend I built the other side and again tested on the street at work. It could now light the tires like a big block powered pickup should.
    That was a real eye opener for me, that old 390 just flat came alive.
     
    warbird1, jet996, saltflats and 7 others like this.
  9. dwollam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 2,841

    dwollam
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'm pretty sure the FE intakes weigh at least 500 pounds! Should be a federal law that they are all replaced with aluminum!

    Dave
     
  10. Jalopy Joker
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 34,207

    Jalopy Joker
    Member

    can always use the engine puller to ***ist with intake.. can run a better cam, etc like with GT motors for horsepower. also depends on rest of drive train, and weight of ride, to determine final power.
     
    57Buick and partssaloon like this.
  11. 2devilles
    Joined: Jul 16, 2021
    Posts: 829

    2devilles
    Member

    I didn't see your cam choice, but the headers are definitely the biggest improvement as far as a bolt on that you can make to an FE (or pretty much any old school Ford. The log style manifolds they seem to like to use were terrible.)...so since you've gone to headers, we need to make it breathe....any standard stock 4 barrel Ford intake manifold is mediocre at best (as I said, stock 4 barrel. 2x4 or 3x2 don't count). Any low rise from the usual suspects (like an Edelbrock Performer) adds nearly zero as far as performance goes, but as already stated, the factory cast iron manifolds are HEAVY. The pushrods go through them and they make up part of the valve cover rail like a normal cylinder head, so the low rise aluminums do have that going for them if nothing else...The Edelbrock Performer RPM is the general "go to" manifold, and works well for pretty much anything until we get into tunnel ram or forced induction applications (nitrous, supercharger, turbo). The Performer RPM is only a few dollars more than a Performer. The performance difference is night and day. Depending on your cam and exhaust choice, it'll make 15 hp at worst, and 40-50 hp difference using a good cam and headers, with more torque and horsepower literally everywhere. It's a no brainer for a street engine.
     
  12. carbking
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 3,981

    carbking
    Member

    Aluminum Offy with a pair of 625 CFM genuine Carter AFB's on mine.

    GT-390 cylinder heads, GT-390 exhaust manifolds (somewhat better than others), and GT-390 cam in my slightly off-topic F100.

    And my wife and I can have a normal conversation OR listen to the radio WHILE the engine is running. I had 4-tube headers, and neither of the above was possible, plus a headache was the norm if one drove more than a few miles. 4-tube should come with ear muffs as an accessory!

    1st gear is useless except for two things:

    (1) tire smoke
    (2) pulling a wagon at idle in the hayfield with no driver (open door to steer)

    2nd gear will roast the tires in the summer, how much power does one need?

    Jon
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2026
  13. corncobcoupe
    Joined: May 26, 2001
    Posts: 8,999

    corncobcoupe
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    Paging @Jeff Norwell

    Jeff’s a FE guru, maybe he can chime in.
     
    57Buick and Jeff Norwell like this.
  14. tjm73
    Joined: Feb 17, 2006
    Posts: 3,684

    tjm73
    Member

    Depends on one's definition of power and how you intend to use it. HAHA
     
  15. onetrickpony
    Joined: Sep 21, 2010
    Posts: 865

    onetrickpony
    Member
    from Texas

    I'm no FE expert, but I have read a lot in anticipation of a project that fell through. Most opinions I have read say the factory intakes are pretty close in performance to the standard Edelbrock Performer. For any appreciable improvement, the Performer RPM is the way to go.

    There are variations in intakes from the factory so you do need to identify which version you have. Some are better than others.
     
    57Buick and Okie Pete like this.
  16. oldolds
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 3,664

    oldolds
    Member

    You also need to remember that if you machined anything off the heads or intake you need to machine the intake as well.
     
    57Buick likes this.
  17. Jeff Norwell
    Joined: Aug 20, 2003
    Posts: 15,324

    Jeff Norwell
    MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    Well.I am NOT a guru.... far from it. but if the OP wants to stay stock... try to find a 352/360 hp 1960 Factory aluminum intake or the Factory 1961 390 intake(aluminum as well.)
    They perform very well for a street performance.

    As mentioned above. the Edelbrock Performer RPM intake is a very good dual plane all around intake.
    Yes.. headers are a very big plus.... Lots of choices today.The factory log exhaust manifolds have to be the worst for an FE.

    As for the factory cast iron intake.... I find they or only good for door stops.,Some people today are trying to sell them for as much as a 100 bucks.... I trashed the ones I used to own.... 86 pounds of garbage....

    But that's just me.


    Screenshot 2026-01-21 at 9.51.28 AM.png Screenshot 2026-01-21 at 9.52.41 AM.png
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2026
  18. Jeff Norwell
    Joined: Aug 20, 2003
    Posts: 15,324

    Jeff Norwell
    MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    Btw..I run a factory Aluminum 352/360 hp intake on a 390....
    the engine is far from stock but the intake is a wonderful street intake.


    Screenshot 2026-01-14 at 8.33.17 AM.png
     
    desotot, deathrowdave, rod1 and 7 others like this.
  19. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,440

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    It all depends on what you want the motor to do. If you plan to use it as a cruiser, don't expect to make major power above 5000 rpm, and want to maintain some semblance of decent mileage, the factory intake will be just fine. If you want to make a ripper, that spins to 6,000+ rpm and pulls hard through all the gears, the factory intake will get pretty wheezy in the upper rpm range.

    I re-built a 390 a number of years ago for use in a '76 F250 Camper Special. Used the factory 4 bbl intake. Howard's Dual Pattern Cam, Headers, 9.5:1 flat tops, D2 Heads - cleaned up with 3 angle valve job, DuraSpark II ignition, and 600 CFM Holley on top. That motor pulled like a freight train between 2200 and 4000 rpm. It handled my 10,000 lb 24' enclosed car hauler with ease. However, it was all done at 4500 rpms, mostly due to the small carb and intake combo.
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2026
  20. jaracer
    Joined: Oct 4, 2008
    Posts: 3,070

    jaracer
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I always thought you would lower the center of gravity on the vehicle about a foot by replacing the stock intake with an aluminum one.
     
  21. RmK57
    Joined: Dec 31, 2008
    Posts: 3,178

    RmK57
    Member

    Are those factory Ford 352 aluminum intakes pretty rare? I don’t think I’ve ever seen a 360 hp 352 before.
     
    Jeff Norwell likes this.
  22. Jeff Norwell
    Joined: Aug 20, 2003
    Posts: 15,324

    Jeff Norwell
    MODERATOR
    Staff Member


    Not that rare... well. yes and no.I see them all the time for about $500.
    Same with the 390 1961 intakes....
    The issue with old aluminum intakes is after 50 years. hopefully they are not warped, cracked or have been planed.And buying from the internet is Risky(any intake or part for that matter)

    Now.... you can look at Amazon and some people(not me) are buying Chinese copies of the Edelbrock RPM Performer..... (So far, not any issues but folks get real Testy when that subject is brought up)

    I have been watching some vids on folks buying these and some are very good. while others have machine finished issues.
    I have to laugh because most forget buying an intake in the 50's or 60's. the production values could be iffy..... I had a vintage Offy for a Hemi that was Horrible.

    Buyer beware I guess.

    I think guys don't bother with them(352/360 horse aluminum ) due to the fact they are building a hi horse FE and they just don't give that kind of performance (stock) for a 500 horse build or higher.
    The 406 came with a factory aluminum intake as well... never seen one... but they were not produced as much because at that time the tri-power was the hot ticket(again, factory wise)

    There are many different intakes to purchase,side winders,427 S, Edelbrocks, Offy's, etc etc.....
    but the OP stated he wants a factory type of intake.
     
  23. 57Buick
    Joined: Dec 2, 2013
    Posts: 179

    57Buick
    Member
    from Alabama

    I love it !
     
  24. 57Buick
    Joined: Dec 2, 2013
    Posts: 179

    57Buick
    Member
    from Alabama

     
  25. 57Buick
    Joined: Dec 2, 2013
    Posts: 179

    57Buick
    Member
    from Alabama

     
  26. 57Buick
    Joined: Dec 2, 2013
    Posts: 179

    57Buick
    Member
    from Alabama

    I will do that
     
  27. 56don
    Joined: Dec 11, 2005
    Posts: 10,334

    56don
    Member

    The best intake I had on my 66GT was an aluminum one from a 428 Police Interceptor.
     
    deathrowdave, 57Buick and rod1 like this.
  28. My 2cents worth: 428 cj intake or an alum unit painted block color if that's important. My 1st dragster was fe powered. I ran the 3 deuce setup back to back with a 428 cj iron take that had an 850 holley. I think the single 4 was the better deal. That was 1976 so the memory is pretty much gone. The 3 deuce setup is about the same amount of rise as a stock 4 bl. intake so other than gaining some cfm, there's not much else there. The engine was a rebuilt 428 with what appeared to be the same head as a 390 with some stiffer valve springs and a solid lifter Chet Herbert cam. I think it was around 230 degrees duration. It had an Accell dual point dist. About as low dollar setup as you could have. :)
     
    deadbeat, 57Buick and Jeff Norwell like this.
  29. There’s a few intakes listed in marketplace around Al, Tn and Ga
    Like these
    IMG_0556.jpeg
    IMG_0563.jpeg
    And this complete engine
    IMG_0557.jpeg
    plus a tri power or 2
    My neighbor has a couple new ones
    He’s between Jasper and Birmingham
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2026
    57Buick and Jeff Norwell like this.
  30. 57Buick
    Joined: Dec 2, 2013
    Posts: 179

    57Buick
    Member
    from Alabama

    I like those. I don't have marketplace. I would love to pretty much have any of those :)
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.