Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Timing for a SBC

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Joe H, Jan 28, 2026 at 8:46 AM.

  1. Joe H
    Joined: Feb 10, 2008
    Posts: 1,907

    Joe H
    Member

    This is from another thread about helping out with a distributor machine. I have a machine and have set up a lot of Pontiac's but no Chevrolets other than a few inline sixes.

    Here is the engine,

    3200-lb 1963 C10 with a Balanced 1965 .030 over 327 about 325 hp with 10:1 CR, Aluminum Camel Hump Heads 2.02/1.64 valves & 64 CC, with 2 Valve Flat Top Pistons 1.675 compression height. Howards Cam MC110991-08DL 221/221 & 470/470 with Lobe Separation 108° & Comp Cams 981-16 Valve Springs, Sanderson Shorty Header's 2 1/2" exhaust with zoomies & 2 1/2" pipe to back of bumper. 3.73 gear's, 26" tires, Muncie SM330 Standard 3 speed 1st gear ratio 2.85, Edelbrock C3BX Intake Manifold & Holley Carb 780 cfm with vacuum secondaries

    What would you set total timing at, how much vacuum, and how fast of a curve?

    For the Pontiac's, dad and I like to have the mechanical all in by 2200 - 2400 rpm with around 24 degrees, then the initial can be set around 10 degrees depending on the engine. The vacuum advance is limited to 10 degrees with an adjustable slide plate in case it needs more or less. The trick is to get timing in quickly, but return to zero before idle speed for easy timing setting at a normal idle rpm.
     
    Tim, RodStRace, 1Nimrod and 1 other person like this.
  2. SDS
    Joined: Apr 28, 2011
    Posts: 1,074

    SDS
    Member

    Tim, Tickety Boo, hrm2k and 2 others like this.
  3. 38Chevy454
    Joined: Oct 19, 2001
    Posts: 6,819

    38Chevy454
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I agree an initial around 12 degrees is a good point to start with. Then drive and see how it does, if hard starting, it might need a little less. If it responds to more than 12, as long as not knocking it may be better. Most older style OHV V8's like SBC seem to like 32-36 total, as the chambers and port design are not as efficient as some later model stuff.

    You really need to just experiment a bit as to where the engine is happiest. Many stock distributor curves are a bit lazy and using lighter springs to bring centrifugal advance in sooner can be beneficial. Remember that the values discussed here are without the vacuum advance contribution. I like manifold vacuum for the distributor, as it gives more advance at light throttle, and pulls back when you have your foot in it. You can sometimes hear when cruising light throttle and then increasing throttle it may knock for brief time initially until the vacuum advance goes away.
     
  4. 05snopro440
    Joined: Mar 15, 2011
    Posts: 3,086

    05snopro440
    Member

    Based on what I found with two of mine last year I think you're right about experimenting. I find mine ran/sounded better at idle on ported vacuum, manifold seemed laboured. I might test it again this year though.

    However, in all the research and testing I did, manifold vs. ported really only makes a difference at idle. Once the throttle is opened vacuum is the same above and below the throttle blades, so there's no difference once you're on the throttle (save a tiny moment for equalization). Manifold adds timing at idle theoretically giving smoother idle, runs cooler, and better on fuel. However some engines like one better, and it depends on the characteristics you like.
     
  5. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 4,080

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    In my thinking & hands on
    Initial would be from start point
    True 14 ish - 18 ,maybe more , each engine different , then curve & total would be Determine by testing & experimenting , Notes .
    Weather conditions can change what engine likes 20 mints later , engine would like a different adjustment.
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  6. Joe H
    Joined: Feb 10, 2008
    Posts: 1,907

    Joe H
    Member

    Thanks guys, it looks like the SBC is pretty much like the Pontiac's I'm used to except with a little more initial. Testing is the only way to know for sure. With a distributor machine, you can at least get the points, dwell, total mechanical, and vacuum limited. With all that information, the owners can adjust up or down and see how it acts.
     
  7. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 9,268

    RodStRace
    Member

    @Joe H I commend you on providing all the info in your first post. That is what is needed to be able to answer the question properly and many people don't do that. Kudos!

    A distributor machine is the measuring tool. It allows easy access and repeatability. The vehicle is the final use. It's why the manual and spec sheet is very useful, but just like alignment specs, they are a guide, not absolute.

    I will also mention that the least amount of advance to get performance, the better. What I mean by that is if 12 and 14 both provide the same result, go with the 12. This allows for a bad load of fuel, barometer change, and isn't on the ragged edge.
     
    Tickety Boo and Sharpone like this.
  8. Joe H
    Joined: Feb 10, 2008
    Posts: 1,907

    Joe H
    Member

    When I send out distributors, they always get a paper with all the details. I start at 600 rpm and write down the timing degrees all the way up to 6000 rpm in 200 rpm steps. The owners can see just how much advance is at any given rpm. I write down how much vacuum is needed to start coming in and how many degrees it goes. They have all the information needed to properly tune with.
     
    Tim, Tickety Boo, 05snopro440 and 2 others like this.
  9. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 9,268

    RodStRace
    Member

    Kids, don't try this at home in the car! :eek: This guy has a distributor machine!:D

    timing.jpg
     
    NoelC likes this.
  10. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,601

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Only ever touched one Pontiac, about 1974 my neighbor had a 350 Firebird that wasn't running right, he thought it needed a tuneup, come to find out it was a bent pushrod, I replaced it and it ran fine.
    As you say about Pontiacs, I'm a Chevy guy, never did much more than set timing by the OEM specs and the seat of my pants as verification.
    I am curious how you originally arrived at the numbers for Pontiacs, was it gained from your dads experience, were they set based on OEM specs?

    This post on the Nova site I visit is similar to your situation.

    "I have an L30 in my 67 but the engine in question is in my 63. It is a 1965 327 block. Bored .060 over. Automatic transmission. It is on its 3rd life for me now. Third car it has been in since I originally got it way back when. That's a story in itself.
    I have not checked TDC but it is next on my list. After last rebuild it had a Winters intake, Holley 650 DP, reproduction L79 cam, double hump heads 2.02 & 1.60 valves, stock distributor with Pertronix ignition. Broken in on a Dyno. Initial timing 16 and total of 38. No vacuum advance. Right at 300 hp. Ran great once it was in the car but was hard to start when it was hot. Put 1" phenolic spacer under the carb and seemed to help. Drove it like that for probably 3 years with no problems other than the starting quirk. Then one day it just started overheating and it has been down hill battle and many $$$ later and I'm still not happy.
    Initial timing is currently 8 deg and 24 mechanical advance for total of 32. I now have vacuum advance and with everything I think it is 46 or 48 deg. Set initial timing at 800 rpm's. In gear it idles right at 600 rpms. Complete new pertronix distributor and Holley Brawler carb now."

    From
    Here:
    https://www.stevesnovasite.com/threads/initial-timing.679157/
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2026 at 2:57 PM
    Tickety Boo and Sharpone like this.
  11. Sharpone
    Joined: Jul 25, 2022
    Posts: 3,194

    Sharpone
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    One thing I would do if it was mine is verify the timing marks on the damper, by checking TDC.
    Dan
     
    Tickety Boo and Fogger like this.
  12. 427 sleeper
    Joined: Mar 8, 2017
    Posts: 3,380

    427 sleeper
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Just going off of the current numbers, and nothing else, I can see why he's not happy. The pertronix distributor isn't helping a damn thing either! IMO 24 degrees is too much mechanical advance. 18-20 is more than enough, all in by about 2000-2200rpm. Then bump up the initial to give around 36 degrees total, give or take a couple. Hook the vacuum advance back up... 1000 rpm idle shouldn't be a problem with the right converter, and he should be off to the races... so to speak.
    Never understood why some people think that a performance engine should idle at 600-800 rpm's...
     
  13. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,601

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

     
    Sharpone, 427 sleeper and Tickety Boo like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.