Features 1932 1933 1934 Ford Victoria

But it's **** is "**** ugly!"
Forward folding seats and large doors really take care of rear acess. You can load p***engers of groceries or a cart full of small appliances.
Most guys don't do a forward folding seat so rear acess is really limited then. Whatever you can drag over the seat that will fit under the headliner.

Judging from the pics of those ladies with the luggage, there's no way to get a chair in that trunk anyway. There's not much room to maneuver between the opening and the structure and the deck lid then the backside of the back seat is right there. I wanna see a video of a chair going in.

 

HERE ARE SOME PHOTOS. The original 1933 schematic shows the Victoria humpback or bustle back.

 

I like all of the Victorias, but I like this '34 the best:



In fact, out of all the pre-1940 Ford body styles, that one would be my first choice for myself.

 

'33 "skirtless" Vicky for the win.

 

No preference, I like 'em all...

 

Here's some more photos of the 1934 Ford Victoria with a trunk.

 

The body molding above the tank skirt on the 33 breaks the big flat area the 34 has. Looking from the rear without the spare looks like the back of Darth Vader's helmet. 33 lowest production number, more rare than 3 window. Harley

 

I prefer having a hidden trunk on the 1934 Ford Victoria. I like the sleek look of the 1934 rear but I think all years 1930-34 Ford Victoria's look great. At one time I sold a beautiful 1933 Ford Victoria that was so early a production model there were no skirts on the fenders. That 1933 went to Utah. Does anybody know where it is now?

 

Like this one ? I have read somewhere the skirtless fender 33's were produced in the Northwest

 

That's a great car and photo showing the rarest 1933 Ford Victoria and a 1934 Victoria in the background. The 1933 Victoria I sold to a Utah customer was dark blue with black fenders.

 

My '34 Vicky - I have a pair of extra 1934 Vicky tail lights - the long ones if anybody needs them....

 

Beautiful 1934 Vickie. It has the right stance and a great color with big and little whitewalls. The little whitewall spare on this street rod also gives it a nostalgic unique look. Being a 1934 Vickie we know its a real Henry Ford car and not a wantabe fibergl*** kit car like so many of the 1932-33 Vickies.

 

according to my friends who have cl***ics car lots, "everyone thinks Vickys are cute, but they are the hardest old Fords to sell"

BTW: Don't you believe '34 Vickys didn't have a trunk... > " highly tooted" as a selling point'

 

Where is a better picture, of the '34 with no trunk?

 

This beauty is what should have been offered in Henry's Ford family. Positively elegant in planning and finishing!

 

32 my vote

 

It don't get no better than Hotrodo's Vicky.

 

All steel Ozzie car. From memory it runs a dressed flattie

 

Thanks Mike , here is a Topdown shot of my 33 ,Top folds neatly under the Boot

 

I don't think anybody has put up the two 4-door Victorias that Brizio has built in the last few years. One's a '32, the other a '33; one is Clapton's and the other is Mumford's (I think). I can't remember which is which.


Was this really necessary? Of course not, but they're neat.

 

Recently got this one going after a 13 year build.

 

Fender less Vicky is my choice

 

The first six months of the 34 Victoria Production, Was smooth rear body panel, The trunk was added for 34 & 1/2 models.

 

Here's one I enjoyed driving for 27 years. It had over 140k miles on it when sold. Great rod!

Photo by Chris Shelton.

Photo by Phil

 

My ugly duckling 34, with the super rare TYDOL man spare tire delete accessory.

 

Going forward another year & the 35 Tudor reverted back to something similar to the 33 Vicky a slant back body devoid of the trunk.

 

Nor-Cal 3/7