Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods What engine does this intake fit?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by tlowe, Apr 7, 2026.

  1. tlowe
    Joined: Oct 22, 2006
    Posts: 161

    tlowe
    Member

    Helping a friend identify. Notice the funny angle to meet the head. Also appears to be for a cross flow head. No p***age way for exhaust to go between intake runners. What is it?
    PXL_20260406_150203371.jpg PXL_20260406_150216343.jpg PXL_20260406_150229286.jpg PXL_20260406_150234669.jpg
     
  2. Tickety Boo
    Joined: Feb 2, 2015
    Posts: 1,930

    Tickety Boo
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    The mounting angle suggests it's a Dodge, :D slant 6
     
    VANDENPLAS and tractorguy like this.
  3. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,066

    BJR
    Member

    Can't think of another engine with angled ports so I agree Chrysler slant 6.
     
    VANDENPLAS and Tickety Boo like this.
  4. Black_Sheep
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 1,620

    Black_Sheep
    Member

    The port arrangement and bolt pattern in the picture is definitely not for a Slant 6…
     
  5. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,998

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Datsun Z
     
    49ratfink likes this.
  6. moparboy440
    Joined: Sep 30, 2011
    Posts: 1,132

    moparboy440
    Member
    from Finland

    AMC straight-6 (199,232,258)
     
    Johnny Gee likes this.
  7. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 23,422

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I can say unequivocally that it's not for a small block Chevy!
     
  8. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,981

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The port arrangement is similar to the 258 AMC straight 6, but the angle and the bolt locations are wrong.

    The fact that there are webs between the ports, and the angle, suggests it's for a cross flow head.

    The fact that it's for 3 one barrels indicates that it's OLD.

    good luck
     
    Tow Truck Tom and Tickety Boo like this.
  9. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 18,036

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Not enough angle for a slant 6. Also the exhaust is on the other side of the cylinder head. The manifold in the background looks to be a an old MOPAR product by the flange? Painted like is was on an old truck; I like the freeze plugs under the carb flanges.
     
    Tickety Boo likes this.
  10. tlowe
    Joined: Oct 22, 2006
    Posts: 161

    tlowe
    Member

    Similar but different bolt pattern
     
  11. Black_Sheep
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 1,620

    Black_Sheep
    Member

    I’m thinking some kind of flathead 6, most “modern” inline 6’s clamp the intake and exhaust to the head using the same hardware for both.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  12. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,998

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    I missed on port shape. Z round, AMC rectangle. Also missed on the webbing Squirrel mentions.
     
  13. My guess it's for a flathead with some sort of aftermarket head on it, maybe a 'F' head conversion. Or did anyone make a F head six?
     
  14. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,981

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    flathead inline engines always have the intake and exhaust ports next to each other, so we know it's not for a flathead, since there's no room for the exhaust manifold, or even for exhaust ports.
     
    jimmy six likes this.
  15. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 19,041

    Squablow
    Member

    Very interesting mystery manifold. The underside of the center runner looks like it had a casting tag on it, I'd like to see a closeup of the underside of that center runner. I can make it out in the second pic.

    Also, are the round spots directly below (what we are ***uming are) carb flanges open? Like, could you stick your finger through there?

    If they're open, that makes me think they would connect to another mirror image intake with pipes, like some kind of wild V12 or something.

    I have no idea, but I do want to know this one.
     
    Tickety Boo, squirrel and tlowe like this.
  16. Jeep did but who the heck would go to the trouble of making a manifold for one of those?
     
    Jagmech likes this.
  17. patsurf
    Joined: Jan 18, 2018
    Posts: 3,401

    patsurf

    maybe there was secret hop-up plans in place for jeeps if ww2 lasted longer..
     
    alanp561 and leon bee like this.
  18. Speed Gems
    Joined: Jul 17, 2012
    Posts: 7,345

    Speed Gems
    Member

    Didn't Willys make am "F" Head?
     
  19. They did, but the only versions I've seen were four bangers.
     
    Speed Gems likes this.
  20. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,661

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    @tlowe
    That port configuration [Ex In In Ex In Ex Ex In Ex In In Ex] Is the same as Ford Falcon 170 / 200 six
    And the angle of the port face is where they milled off the log manifold for a Hotrod triple carb conversion

    compare this
    upload_2026-4-8_15-18-42.png


    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2026
    Moondog13, AHotRod and tlowe like this.
  21. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 4,618

    oldiron 440
    Member

    Ford 250 six, has a bolt on manifold.
     
  22. d2_willys
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,393

    d2_willys
    Member
    from Kansas

    Jeep had a six cylinder 161 F head engine. I have one in my Willys AeroEagle.
     
  23. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,661

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    That is a possibility
    The Aussie 250 2v has a bolt on intake ,the 250 1v has a log intake
    [​IMG]
     
    Robert J. Palmer likes this.
  24. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,981

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    it's pretty close, but I doubt that's what the intake was for. Although, if you can find any do***entation for it...I'll easily be convinced.
     
  25. Oneball
    Joined: Jul 30, 2023
    Posts: 1,913

    Oneball
    Member

    Is there a number cast here. IMG_3171.jpeg
     
  26. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,661

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    @oldiron 440
    I doubt if it is for the Aussie Falcon 2v head because the bolt pattern is all out of phase and the ports are round . The Aussie head was from an era when triple 1v downdraught carbs wouldn't be used [they'd use Webers]

    Here is the 2V head intake face
    upload_2026-4-9_8-16-13.png

    Here's the intake with square ports and the different bolt pattern
    upload_2026-4-9_8-18-36.png

    I've seen triple carb conversions on speedway cars [back in my dad's era] where the log was milled off.
    Usually flanges were brazed onto them.

    144 and 170 heads had oval ports with the intake milled off, but some 200's had square ports [below]
    upload_2026-4-9_8-42-1.png

    Anything is possible with Racer / Hotrod innovation back when they had to build equipment instead of buying it.
     
  27. tlowe
    Joined: Oct 22, 2006
    Posts: 161

    tlowe
    Member

    Here is the top side after blasting. 18.5" center of outer bolt to other center of outer bolt
    Second picture is the casting on the bottom.
    PXL_20260408_214806357.jpg PXL_20260408_214827372.jpg
     
    Last edited: Apr 9, 2026
    AHotRod and Duellym like this.
  28. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 7,050

    Fordors
    Member

    August 7, 2009 ?
    IMG_5654.jpeg
     
    Duellym likes this.
  29. SR100
    Joined: Nov 26, 2013
    Posts: 1,416

    SR100
    Member

    This looks like a different manifold. The bottom of the red painted manifold is closed in the third picture:
    upload_2026-4-9_5-49-38.jpeg
    The carb mounts look simpler, too.
     
  30. Yes, but it was at one point a common practice to cut off and mill the intake off.

    Hillborn even made fuel injection for the Falcon 6 and they were raced in midgets.
    upload_2026-4-9_12-18-37.jpeg
    upload_2026-4-9_12-17-2.jpeg
     

    Attached Files:

    302GMC likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.