Register now to get rid of these ads!

flathead cam advice

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by cudachaser, Nov 13, 2006.

  1. cudachaser
    Joined: Aug 24, 2006
    Posts: 5

    cudachaser
    Member

    I'm building an 8BA street motor and I want it to have a tough ballsy cam, and also want it to be street friendly. I'm looking at the Isky 400JR but some say it's too much for my application. It's got a 3.24 bore hypermax pistons with 4" merc stroke. Offy heads and intake with dual Stroms and I'm probably gonna put a C-4 behind it. The other cam I'm looking at is the Isky 88. Anyone out there with experience in this area, I'd greatly appreciate any feedback.


    Peace
     
  2. 8flat
    Joined: Apr 2, 2006
    Posts: 1,392

    8flat
    Member

    My machinist talked me out of the 400JR, and convinced me that the MAX1 would be much easier to deal with on the street. That might even be more of an issue with your automatic. My cam specs are .350 lift and 249 dur, compared with .400 lift and 258 dur on the 400JR cam.

    But having said that, i think the 400JR would sound badder. Is that a word? haha.
     
  3. 21stud
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 336

    21stud
    Member
    from California

    My father installed a Isky 400jr cam he had been saving for years in a 276ci eng with Edelbrock heads and dual intake and didn't like it. Low vac levels and he had to install adj tappets with "thin" heads for clearance. He ended up installing a 77B grind which I think is Isky's 3/4 race grind. Not lopey but he's happy. He also had very good luck with a Moon Super 3/4 race grind in another eng. 360 lift,270 duration.Little more lope. I had Bill Jinks at Moon grind me a standard 3/4 race with 329 lift,256 duration which is simliar to the Isky 77B. Moon regrinds are about $ 100 cheaper. I haven't installed my cam yet ,but in this day and age when can you actually meet the machinist who grinds your cam.? That alone is cool and worth the trip.
     
  4. Vintage Driveline
    Joined: Jul 12, 2006
    Posts: 145

    Vintage Driveline
    Alliance Vendor

    400JR is the only cam in my eyes....!
    built many flats with that cam from wild to just a stock F.H. without and changes except a 400JR
     
  5. Flatdog
    Joined: Jan 31, 2003
    Posts: 1,285

    Flatdog
    Member Emeritus

    max 1 is what you need.
     
  6. Automotive Stud
    Joined: Sep 26, 2004
    Posts: 4,391

    Automotive Stud
    Member

    Ok, first post an intro.

    Second, what kind of car is it going in? The weight of the car will make a big difference in what you can and can't get by with. I doubt it's your flathead powered '68 barracuda :rolleyes:
     
  7. 8flat
    Joined: Apr 2, 2006
    Posts: 1,392

    8flat
    Member

    Exactly, if it's a heavy car with the automatic, I would think the Max1 would be a better choice because it would give better performance at lower RPMs. Just a thought.
     
  8. Ole don
    Joined: Dec 16, 2005
    Posts: 2,915

    Ole don
    Member

    I have a 286 motor in a light car, I run a Berry 400jr. it has .410 lift, adv 295, 242 at .050 Runs great. Be sue to clay the heads. Berry will regrind your cam for cheap. PM me for a phome number.
     
  9. cudachaser
    Joined: Aug 24, 2006
    Posts: 5

    cudachaser
    Member

    Check my intro, Sorry. It's going in a 30's style RPU, it will be light. I won't be taking any long road trips or sit in traffic endlessly with it. I've heard some flatheads remind me of an old Harley, that's the lopey sound I want. I'm leaning toward the 400JR but I don't want to be asking for trouble.
    Anyone using Edelbrock heads and intake.
    Peace
     
  10. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    400JR is a bit much, especially in front of an auto - it's also hard on the valve train. Check over on Fordbarn - do a search for cam & read for hours.

    77B - don't waste your money - it's nearly stock. If you're having doubts about the 400Jr, go with the Max-1.

    Personally, I think for the auto, you'll be better off with a Max-1. It will have a lope to it & if you're really after the "harley" sound, just turn your idle down a bit...

    As for Edelbrock v Offy heads & intakes, it's a tossup. QC in both is down, with Offy having more issues I think. Regardless of your choice, be sure & clay your valves if running a big cam...
     
  11. Hey Ernie,

    So whats the biggest issue do you think, duration or lift? Is the 400 Jnr hard on valves because of its lift?

    I've heard endless good things about the L100 from Cam Techniques. Everything from stock to souped up hotties and it seems to run fine. The Potvin 3/8 is also supposed to be a hot cam but easy on the lift. I'm toying with going either the Potvin 400 or 3/8 in mine.

    Danny
     
  12. May I make a suggestion? Everyone that I know of that has run a slush box behind thier flatty has been disappointed. Not saying it cant be done well but thats the feedback I've got.

    Lets face it, flatheads are not every going to be torque or HP monsters and in order to get the best drive from them, we need to get as much power to the road as possible. Go for a manual, preferably a 5 speed. The over drive will allow you to run 4.11's and get excellent highway milage.

    The other issue is, due to the low revving nature of the motor, have a 5 speed really allows you to select the right gear, all the time. This means you can run a bigger cam and keep the motor in the right rev range to maximise its power band.

    Danny
     
  13. 8flat
    Joined: Apr 2, 2006
    Posts: 1,392

    8flat
    Member

    That's good advice from Psychobilly, I wouldn't use an automatic either. A T5 ****** is a really popular choice, that's what I have my eye on. I think a T56 would be even better, but I don't know if there are any kits out there.

    If using a T5 in a pickup, you need to use the style out of an S10 pickup, so the shifter doesn't stick out under your seat...
     
  14. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    I'm with psychobilly boi on the auto - I think the flatty is better suited to rowing the gears. There are a few exceptions, of course, but.

    As for the anectdotal evidence of the 400Jr being hard on valve train, I believe it has to do with the acceleration of the lobes being very abrupt - visualize an oval vs an egg - the vertical component happens very quickly.

    So it's not overall lift, but how quickly it gets there - a combination of lift & duration.
     
  15. challengerman
    Joined: Apr 13, 2006
    Posts: 27

    challengerman
    Member

    M-77 and 77-B probably aren't the same grind. An Isky 88 would be cool with a stick shift.
     
  16. 5 speed, just ask me !!

    Rat
     
  17. KS Fats
    Joined: Aug 19, 2005
    Posts: 83

    KS Fats
    Member

    The subject of flathead cams is like opening up a can of worms... everybody has their favorite and some work better than others. Ron H likes the L-100 from cam techniques, 286 likes Schnieder etc. I recently did a mild street engine using the Max-1 in a 40 coupe; the customer was very happy. The lifter acceleration rate on the 400 is pretty high... I have removed these from old circle track engines and found significant lobe wear. Call Chris Nielson out in Utah (sorry at work don't have the number) and discuss your needs: he has done cams for turbocharged flatheads up to drag race style configurations... he is also willing to mix profiles on the intake and exhaust to fit your needs. He ground two different profiles for me on a street cam and the low end was very good... happy hunting ...fats
     
  18. Kevin Lee
    Joined: Nov 12, 2001
    Posts: 7,676

    Kevin Lee
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Went with a Max1 per Flatdog's suggestion and couldn't be happier.

    I have a little modified track-nosed roadster in case you aren't familiar. I added the cam over the winter so it had been a while since I'd driven the car. I knew I was running quicker/faster/better but it wasn't until I was on the street with a couple other flatheads that I realized it was actually damn fast.

    The bad part of this story is that one of the lobes went flat (yes, it's confirmed) so I had to drop a stocker back in. And driving that stock motor reaffirmed what I already knew - stock cams ****.

    I'm not saying the Max1 is the best, but I think nearly any cam is better than stock.

    I've officially taken the stance that multiple carbs are just another doo-dad unless there's a cam backing them up. So I am again driving half a hot rod until I figure out my problems.
     
  19. cudachaser
    Joined: Aug 24, 2006
    Posts: 5

    cudachaser
    Member

    Good Stuff Guys, this is the 1st motor I've ever built; and for some odd reason I chose a Flathead. So far so good, I'm having a ball working and learning. I have a machine shop here in Vegas that will be doing my machine work and he has built Flatheads before. I will get his opinion but I wanted to be armed with all the info I could find. You guys have given me alot of good info, and my initial plan was to put a T-5 behind it; but I started thinking about being lazy so I thought of the C-4.

    Peace
     
  20. Big Tony
    Joined: Mar 29, 2006
    Posts: 3,588

    Big Tony
    Member

    53Ash had his machinist regrind one for him for like 40 bucks and it freaking rocks. Might PM him for more info on it since he doesnt get on but everyo other day or so.
     
  21. cbndrhsr
    Joined: Sep 14, 2005
    Posts: 46

    cbndrhsr
    Member
    from Layton, UT

    Here's Chris Nielson's phone # in Farmington, Ut.:801.451.7745 Be patient, he will return your call. He's had some health problems lately so he's not at the shop every day.Best bet is his email:vintagecams@juno.com He just did a cam for me that he called his hot 3/4. Its in an 8ba thats warmed over, and I love it! I think its close to a potvin grind. Hope this helps.
     
  22. KS Fats
    Joined: Aug 19, 2005
    Posts: 83

    KS Fats
    Member

    Kevin, at the risk of being redundant, there has been quite a rash of camshafts going flat recently. The current practice recommends breaking the cam in using Diesel Compatible oil; it seems that the Feds have mandated removal of zinc from automotive oils for environmental purposes. Zinc is still utilized in the formulation of Diesel oil and provides extra lubricity at the lifter to lobe contact area...bear in mind this is for break- in only ... usually 15 to 20 minutes at 1500 rpm will do it. The Max 1 isn't that aggresive so if everything was up to snuff on the set up you shouldn't have had problems. Chevrolet also still produces their EOS which was developed specifically to break in the old Duntov cams... I've used it successfuly also. Hope this helps...... fats
     
  23. Hi Guys,

    This zink issue is a big deal over on the fordbarn site. Whats the real story?

    Danny
     
  24. Automotive Stud
    Joined: Sep 26, 2004
    Posts: 4,391

    Automotive Stud
    Member

    Kevin, what were the symptoms when your cam died?
     
  25. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    Fordbarners swear the Shell Rotella still has the zinc in it - I haven't checked & am running Valvoline in a stock engine...
     
  26. Kevin Lee
    Joined: Nov 12, 2001
    Posts: 7,676

    Kevin Lee
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Tap tap tap tap tap tap tap tap tap tap tap. :) Even ran fine until I pulled it with the tap.

    As far as I know Rotella is no good anymore. I can tell you after my cam mishap and the dough/time involved I'll be relying on more than someone else's swearing.
     
  27. briggs&strattonChev
    Joined: Feb 20, 2003
    Posts: 2,237

    briggs&strattonChev
    Member

    What brand is the Max1 cam?

    And maybe someone could give me a quick rundown of cam regrinding. To me, it doesnt make sense that a stock cam would be able to be reground to something hotter, just something smaller :confused:? I must be missing something because if you are removing material I dont see how you can get MORE lift/duration? Please help on this if you can, or point me somewhere.
     
  28. Kevin Lee
    Joined: Nov 12, 2001
    Posts: 7,676

    Kevin Lee
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Max1 is from Isky.

    Reground cams: It's not about how much material is left. It's about the SHAPE of the material that's left.

    Think about it, remove material from the base circle (heel), readjust lifters, and presto! more lift.
     
  29. Automotive Stud
    Joined: Sep 26, 2004
    Posts: 4,391

    Automotive Stud
    Member

    Kevin, what oil will you be running? What happened when you tried to adjust the valves?
     
  30. KS Fats
    Joined: Aug 19, 2005
    Posts: 83

    KS Fats
    Member

    Psycho, I'm not a lubrication engineer but as I understand it zinc was utilized as an anti scuffing agent for areas exposed to sliding friction and not being lubricated by pressurized oil. If you calculate the load at the lifter to lobe contact area it turns out to be one of the highest loaded areas of the engine ( even with flathead valve springs). The best corrolation I can think of is the relationship of lead in gasoline to the valve and seat; lead "cushioned" the impact of the valve on the seat and zinc provides a "slippery" cushion at the lifter contact area. I was under the impression that Rotella still contained zinc also so try to find out more. The EOS I recommended contains molybdenum disulphide and provides the same characteristics as zinc; I think we should remember that lifter to lobe contact area is splash lubricated and the pressure AND volume of the oil pump must be sufficient to supply this area. Even with the relatively low spring pressures on a flathead, the cam should get new or resurfaced lifters whenever a change is made. fats
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.