Register now to get rid of these ads!

In Your Opinion...Where Is the Cut-Off Date???

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by RUSTEE 57 GMC, Nov 22, 2006.

  1. mr.wolf
    Joined: Feb 23, 2006
    Posts: 96

    mr.wolf
    Member

  2. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,232

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

  3. 6t5frlane
    Joined: Dec 8, 2004
    Posts: 2,402

    6t5frlane
    Member
    from New York

    I don't think that on Dec 31 1964 Old style went dead. Matter of fact muscle cars were around long before the 64 GTO. 409's 413 etc....I think the Pony car thing changed things. A mind set was changing. That being said 65-66 were some wild years for customs A/FX , all kinds of things
     
  4. When I was a kid.... you NEVER crossed 48th street.

    I can live with that 'till I die.

    Hell, some people on this board think a pymouth valiant is a hot rod and a ford falcon is a custom.

    Guess I'm getting old.
     
  5. 2manybillz
    Joined: May 30, 2005
    Posts: 843

    2manybillz
    Member

    Is the El Matador '40 ford a rod or a custom? I don't think a cutoff designated strictly by year works.

    Oh yeah and yall ain't a contraction - yall's is.
     
  6. Junkyard Jan
    Joined: Jan 7, 2005
    Posts: 738

    Junkyard Jan
    Member Emeritus

    Far as my personal taste, or lack thereof goes, 1979 is my cutoff year. If you use your imagination a bit, there are some '70s cars that have a bunch of customizing potential. Boat tail Rivs, '70-'76 Caddies, '70-'77 Monte Carlos and Grand Prixs and my personal favorite, the '77-'79 T-Birds just to name a few. In fact, I've got a solid '79 in storage that I've owned for years sittin' in storage that will eventually become a mild custom. If everybody but me hates it, oh well....


    Jan
     
  7. recardo
    Joined: Aug 31, 2006
    Posts: 833

    recardo
    Member
    from Winslow

    Which has nothing to do with anything.
     
  8. hilbillyjim1948
    Joined: Jul 2, 2006
    Posts: 116

    hilbillyjim1948
    Member
    from australia

    1948 is the accepted standard cut off over here and most of the guys who argue against it are the ones who have no idea how to resurect something that old or they know how cool rods are and want to be included in the scene but drive something newer,flat black falcons and valiants with whitewalls are not hot rods!never will be ,ther are a lot of guys here who think they are as well and over here the line is getting blurred even more since the rat craze has taken off any fool with a rattle can and $200 can buy a shit heap 60s car paint it lower it and think their a rodder ? we all know their not that simple to build so i agree 48th st should never be crossed unless it s your beater ,but itll never be a rod,hot rod magazine will never be in my stash as they rarly have rods in em,just muslce car s which i have no interes in ,its got me fucked why they call it a hot rod mag
     
  9. poncho62
    Joined: Nov 23, 2005
    Posts: 1,094

    poncho62
    BANNED

    And, a Hot Rod doesn't have to be flat black and have wide whitewalls.....................And the owner doesn't have to have dopey tattoos.
     
  10. xderelict
    Joined: Jul 30, 2006
    Posts: 2,475

    xderelict
    Member Emeritus

    I prefer rust pre 48, and really good tattoos
     
  11. Automotive Stud
    Joined: Sep 26, 2004
    Posts: 4,385

    Automotive Stud
    Member

    I want to change my answer. Febuary 3, 1959. Wait, that's the day the music died...

    back to the drawing board.

    Obviously we can't say up until 19XX is a hot rod and after is a custom. Life isn't that simple...
     
  12. Petejoe
    Joined: Nov 27, 2002
    Posts: 12,525

    Petejoe
    Member
    from Zoar, Ohio

    This is really a stupid post. lets all talk about the differences of traditional builds vs ratrods or what is a hotrod or fuck it..
    I dont know why I read this...
    Rusty.... I agree with others. Spend more time posting some tech shit or post a problem your having in the garage. These posts are stupid banter.
     
  13. seymour
    Joined: Jan 22, 2004
    Posts: 5,125

    seymour
    Member
    from PNW

    Might I direct you to his latest ingenious thread....

    http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=144624
     
  14. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 32,328

    The37Kid
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I guess the answer depends on how old you are and when you got into the hobby. I'll be 56 next month and spent my first full day at a car show when I was 10, they had a pre 1943 cut off date back then. For me Pre 1916 is an Antique or Brass Car, Pre 1943 is an old car, Classics are the high end cars regognizes by the CCCA, a true Hot Rod was built Pre 1965 from a pre 1949 vehicle. Customs are built from Pre 1965 vehicles in my opinion. The others '40's, '50's, '60's etc. are what they are. Oh, almost forgot Vintage Sports cars & Race Cars are also pre 1965 IMO, along with motorcycles. SO, the cut off year of interist for me personally is 1965.:)
     
  15. Jack
    Joined: Sep 6, 2006
    Posts: 104

    Jack
    Member
    from Austin Tx

    1970 is the cutoff year for anything worth driving.
     
  16. poncho62
    Joined: Nov 23, 2005
    Posts: 1,094

    poncho62
    BANNED

  17. plz
     

    Attached Files:

  18. Eroc
    Joined: Jun 19, 2005
    Posts: 60

    Eroc
    Member

    Who really cares what anybody thinks as long as you like what you see when you step back and like what you feel when you step on it. Leave all the classification bullshit to Hemmings' collectors. But that's just me, i'm a '60.
     
  19. Eroc
    Joined: Jun 19, 2005
    Posts: 60

    Eroc
    Member

    another way to put it-- if hitting the dashboard with your head is likely to kill you, it's probably a good year.
     
  20. J.B.
    Joined: Jan 7, 2005
    Posts: 1,246

    J.B.
    Member
    from Sweden

    Pre 1893! Newer cars are gay...
    [​IMG]
     
  21. in the old days they had range wars over people drawing lines with barbed wire.
    I feel the same about drawing lines today. what some club, magazine, group, sets up as a time frame that suits them does not change the world.
    The dumbest one (other than this post) is customs. anything that is customized is a custom regardless of year make or model! Does that make sense?
    Hot Rods are modified stockers! no year make or model. If I put a 426 Hemi in a Toyota Pius its going to be a fucking hot rod! does that make sense?
    now when the factory tries to build a hot rod. they are hot stockers or you could use Muscle car. 2006 Chrysler SRT8 is a hot car probably blow the doors off most hot rods. but it will never be a Hot Rod does that make sense?
    Now all this is my opinion, and that has not or will not change one single mind on this board. It's just another Opinion!! Does that make sense?
    I'm surprised that someone hasn't added this
     

    Attached Files:

  22. recardo
    Joined: Aug 31, 2006
    Posts: 833

    recardo
    Member
    from Winslow

    Isn't it past your bedtime?
     
  23. Im kinda sorry I posted on this now, it degenerated quite quick.
    Dangit, now look what'cha made me do! Posted again........
     
  24. 40Standard
    Joined: Jul 30, 2005
    Posts: 5,971

    40Standard
    Member
    from Indy

  25. JohnnyP.
    Joined: Aug 3, 2005
    Posts: 1,301

    JohnnyP.
    Member

  26. propwash
    Joined: Jul 25, 2005
    Posts: 3,857

    propwash
    Member
    from Las Vegas

    This is an excellent subject - classic, antique, muscle, hot rod, custom, etc.

    My feeling is that "classic" is grossly overused- Classic should be a vehicle that epitomizes an era...a style...or a vehicle that stands out from a design or engineering standpoint from its cookie-cutter contemporaries. Cord and Duesenburg are good examples...pre-1941 Packards, pretty much any 30s Caddy/Lincoln. In my not so humble opinion, there aren't many "classics" of the more modern era, due mostly to marketing departments and government intervention.

    Antiques is a term that should be relegated to brass-era cars of any make.

    Muscle cars probably began with the first large V8 in a mid-size car - although using that definition puts the Olds 88 of 1949 pretty much right in the beginning...mostly muscle cars have a performance emphasis, so notwithstanding the dubious claims of PMD, the GTO was NOT the "first muscle car", nor was the '55 Chrysler 300 and its ensuing versions.

    Hot rod and/or street rod - by definition of the NSRA - any modified car manufactured prior to 1949. I don't agree - I think any vehicle which is modified for enhanced performance should be considered a hot rod - street rod is just another version used to clean up the sullied image implied from bad deportment of said owner/drivers in the 50s.

    Custom - pretty much the opposite of hot rod. A vehicle where more money was spent on body/frame modifications than was spent on the engine compartment. Not that some customs didn't have some awesome engines, but the overall impetus was to create a car with some visual diversity and an expression of the owner's own style.

    Collectibles - this term defines itself. Pretty much anything that someone wants bad enough to bid on it could be considered a collectible (note that collectible is the noun, collectable is the verb).

    I don't necessarily believe (irrespective of the NSRA legalese) that there are any "cut-off" years for the above categories. A '41 Ford can be (and certainly has been) extensively "customized" as well as "hot-rodded". A '58 Impala with some shaving/smoothing with a high-performance engine is more of a hot rod...although were it left reasonably stock (mild hop-up) with the same body mods, would more likely be considered a "custom".

    That's my nickel's worth. Just a long-time car nut with plenty of opinions.

    "...two cool shorts sittin' side by side..."

    dj
     
  27. seymour
    Joined: Jan 22, 2004
    Posts: 5,125

    seymour
    Member
    from PNW

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.